PSS Sleman vs Garudayaksa FC: match statistics
PSS Sleman vs Garudayaksa FC: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
PSS Sleman played against Garudayaksa FC in Liga 2 (Indonesia). The game was played on May 9, 2026. Final score: 2:2.
Recent form
PSS Sleman has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Garudayaksa FC has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.20 points per game.
Scoring records
PSS Sleman scores 2.00 goals per game and allows 0.70. Garudayaksa FC scores 1.81 and allows 0.70. Games in this league average 2.79 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 59% of PSS Sleman's games and 44% of Garudayaksa FC's. The Over 2.5 rates are 56% and 41%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 49% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Garudayaksa FC has the higher season xG average, 1.57 to 1.34 per game. PSS Sleman takes 10.5 shots per game, while Garudayaksa FC takes 10.7.
First-half and second-half trends
PSS Sleman leads at halftime in 48% of its games and scores 1.22 goals per game after halftime. Garudayaksa FC leads at halftime in 44% and scores 0.96 after halftime.
When the teams score
PSS Sleman's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (14 goals). For Garudayaksa FC, it is minutes 16-30 (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Liga 2 games average 2.79 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 49% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
PSS Sleman holds a clear attacking edge at home: in home matches they average 2.36 goals per game and have 54 goals this season (14 in the last 5), while Garudayaksa FC score only 1.15 goals away on average and have 49 goals this season (9 in the last 5). The hosts also create better chances — averaging 5.36 shots on target and 11.5 attempts per home game with a 20% conversion rate, versus 4.7 shots on target, 11.1 attempts and 10% efficiency for the visitors, which suggests more high-quality opportunities for PSS. Defensively both teams are solid: PSS concede 0.5 goals per home game on average with xG against 0.75 and xG for 1.53, while Garudayaksa concede 0.62 goals away, have xG for 1.45 and xG against 1.32, indicating the visitors more frequently allow opponents into dangerous situations. Forms are similar: PSS in the last 5 have a record of 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss (14 goals scored), while Garudayaksa are unbeaten in their last 5 (3 wins, 2 draws) with 9 goals and slightly higher points per game (2.2 vs 2.0). Given the substantial home efficiency advantage (20% vs 10%), higher home goals average (2.36 vs 1.15) and more shots on target, I predict a PSS Sleman win; I assess probabilities at roughly 65% for the hosts, 20% draw and 15% for Garudayaksa FC.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The 'no' scenario (BTTS - No) appears more likely. Garudayaksa records a 62% clean sheet rate and only 31% BTTS, a strong defensive indicator. PSS Sleman at home scores 2.43 goals per match with xG for 1.66, so the hosts will create chances, but they concede only 0.79 goals at home, limiting opponents' opportunities. Garudayaksa averages 1.15 goals away with xG for 1.45, generating chances, but the visitors' low finishing (conversion rate 10% vs hosts 19% and average shots on target 4.7 vs 6.07) reduces scoring probability. Seasonal metrics show a discrepancy: PSS has 57% BTTS at home vs league average 50%, while Garudayaksa sits at 31%, yet in the last 5 meetings BTTS occurred in only 40% of matches, which supports the No Goal outcome. Considering Garudayaksa's defensive edge (62% CS), the lower away goals average 1.15 and the BTTS split 57% vs 31% between home and away, I assess BTTS probability at 40% for 'yes' and 60% for 'no' and tip 'no'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Seasonal stats strongly point to a goals match: PSS Sleman averages 2.43 goals per game (xG 1.66), while Garudayaksa averages 1.15 goals (xG 1.45), yielding averaged expected goals of 1.49 for the home side and 1.26 for the away side (total 2.75). A Poisson model with total lambda=2.75 gives probabilities of Over 1.5 ≈76%, Over 2.5 ≈52% and Over 3.5 ≈30%, therefore the strongest signal is Over 1.5. In the last 5 matches PSS scored 14 goals (2.8 per game) and Garudayaksa 9 goals (1.8 per game), which further supports a scenario of at least two goals. PSS averages 12.93 shots and 6.07 shots on target with a conversion rate of 19%, versus Garudayaksa’s 11.1 shots and 10% conversion, indicating a clear attacking edge for the hosts. Although Garudayaksa has 62% of matches with a clean sheet, PSS’s high efficiency and the fact PSS has 79% of fixtures with Over 1.5 argue in favor of an Over 1.5 bet.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
PSS Sleman holds a clear advantage: they average 2.43 goals per match versus Garudayaksa’s 1.15, win 64% of games compared to the visitors’ 38%, and have an xG of 1.66 against 1.45 with 6.07 shots on target versus 4.7, which favors the hosts to score first. At Half-Time, the home side led in 50% of matches and average 1.0 goals in the first half versus the visitors’ 0.69, so the most likely scenario is PSS leading after 45 minutes. In the Second Half PSS also dominates: they average 1.43 goals after the break while the visitors only average 0.46, and second-half goals average 1.71 vs 0.77, suggesting the lead will be maintained or extended. For these reasons I assign the highest probability to 1/1 (37%), with X/1 (18%) and X/X (14%) also realistic, while a full turnaround in favor of the visitors (2/2) is rated low at 3% due to their lower conversion rate of 10% and weaker second halves.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| PSS Sleman | Garudayaksa FC | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 46% | 45% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.42 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Garudayaksa FC is 10% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - PSS Sleman · 2.2 pts / game - Garudayaksa FC
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
PSS Sleman is 10% better for: goals scored per game.
2 goals / game - PSS Sleman · 1.81 goals / game - Garudayaksa FC
PSS Sleman scores in 89% of games (24 of 27 meczów), while Garudayaksa FC keeps a clean sheet in 48% (13 of 27 meczów).
Garudayaksa FC scores in 78% of games (21 of 27 meczów), while PSS Sleman keeps a clean sheet in 37% (10 of 27 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - PSS Sleman
Over / Under - Garudayaksa FC
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
PSS Sleman - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 48% of games and wins 59%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Garudayaksa FC - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 44% of games and wins 52%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +6 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (14 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (11 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
PSS Sleman
Garudayaksa FC
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 2).
Teams vs league
| PSS Sleman | Liga | Garudayaksa FC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.70 | 2.79 | ▼ 2.52 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 59% | 50% | ▼ 44% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 56% | 49% | ▼ 41% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 37% | 28% | ▲ 48% |
| Goal before half-time | • 70% | 70% | • 70% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 89% | 79% | ▼ 56% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of PSS Sleman vs Garudayaksa FC?
The Liga 2 match finished PSS Sleman 2:2 Garudayaksa FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before PSS Sleman vs Garudayaksa FC?
PSS Sleman score 2.00 goals per game on average and Garudayaksa FC 1.81. The Liga 2 average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 59% of PSS Sleman's matches and 44% of Garudayaksa FC's.
What form are PSS Sleman and Garudayaksa FC in?
Over the last 5 games PSS Sleman have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Garudayaksa FC 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for PSS Sleman vs Garudayaksa FC?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


