Indonesia - Liga 2Data current as of September 11, 2026

PSS Sleman vs Garudayaksa FC: match statistics

PSS Sleman crest
PSS Sleman
2 : 2half-time 0:2
Garudayaksa FC crest
Garudayaksa FC

PSS Sleman vs Garudayaksa FC: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

PSS Sleman played against Garudayaksa FC in Liga 2 (Indonesia). The game was played on May 9, 2026. Final score: 2:2.

Recent form

PSS Sleman has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Garudayaksa FC has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.20 points per game.

Scoring records

PSS Sleman scores 2.00 goals per game and allows 0.70. Garudayaksa FC scores 1.81 and allows 0.70. Games in this league average 2.79 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 59% of PSS Sleman's games and 44% of Garudayaksa FC's. The Over 2.5 rates are 56% and 41%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 49% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Garudayaksa FC has the higher season xG average, 1.57 to 1.34 per game. PSS Sleman takes 10.5 shots per game, while Garudayaksa FC takes 10.7.

First-half and second-half trends

PSS Sleman leads at halftime in 48% of its games and scores 1.22 goals per game after halftime. Garudayaksa FC leads at halftime in 44% and scores 0.96 after halftime.

When the teams score

PSS Sleman's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (14 goals). For Garudayaksa FC, it is minutes 16-30 (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Liga 2 games average 2.79 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 49% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

PSS Sleman holds a clear attacking edge at home: in home matches they average 2.36 goals per game and have 54 goals this season (14 in the last 5), while Garudayaksa FC score only 1.15 goals away on average and have 49 goals this season (9 in the last 5). The hosts also create better chances — averaging 5.36 shots on target and 11.5 attempts per home game with a 20% conversion rate, versus 4.7 shots on target, 11.1 attempts and 10% efficiency for the visitors, which suggests more high-quality opportunities for PSS. Defensively both teams are solid: PSS concede 0.5 goals per home game on average with xG against 0.75 and xG for 1.53, while Garudayaksa concede 0.62 goals away, have xG for 1.45 and xG against 1.32, indicating the visitors more frequently allow opponents into dangerous situations. Forms are similar: PSS in the last 5 have a record of 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss (14 goals scored), while Garudayaksa are unbeaten in their last 5 (3 wins, 2 draws) with 9 goals and slightly higher points per game (2.2 vs 2.0). Given the substantial home efficiency advantage (20% vs 10%), higher home goals average (2.36 vs 1.15) and more shots on target, I predict a PSS Sleman win; I assess probabilities at roughly 65% for the hosts, 20% draw and 15% for Garudayaksa FC.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The 'no' scenario (BTTS - No) appears more likely. Garudayaksa records a 62% clean sheet rate and only 31% BTTS, a strong defensive indicator. PSS Sleman at home scores 2.43 goals per match with xG for 1.66, so the hosts will create chances, but they concede only 0.79 goals at home, limiting opponents' opportunities. Garudayaksa averages 1.15 goals away with xG for 1.45, generating chances, but the visitors' low finishing (conversion rate 10% vs hosts 19% and average shots on target 4.7 vs 6.07) reduces scoring probability. Seasonal metrics show a discrepancy: PSS has 57% BTTS at home vs league average 50%, while Garudayaksa sits at 31%, yet in the last 5 meetings BTTS occurred in only 40% of matches, which supports the No Goal outcome. Considering Garudayaksa's defensive edge (62% CS), the lower away goals average 1.15 and the BTTS split 57% vs 31% between home and away, I assess BTTS probability at 40% for 'yes' and 60% for 'no' and tip 'no'.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Seasonal stats strongly point to a goals match: PSS Sleman averages 2.43 goals per game (xG 1.66), while Garudayaksa averages 1.15 goals (xG 1.45), yielding averaged expected goals of 1.49 for the home side and 1.26 for the away side (total 2.75). A Poisson model with total lambda=2.75 gives probabilities of Over 1.5 ≈76%, Over 2.5 ≈52% and Over 3.5 ≈30%, therefore the strongest signal is Over 1.5. In the last 5 matches PSS scored 14 goals (2.8 per game) and Garudayaksa 9 goals (1.8 per game), which further supports a scenario of at least two goals. PSS averages 12.93 shots and 6.07 shots on target with a conversion rate of 19%, versus Garudayaksa’s 11.1 shots and 10% conversion, indicating a clear attacking edge for the hosts. Although Garudayaksa has 62% of matches with a clean sheet, PSS’s high efficiency and the fact PSS has 79% of fixtures with Over 1.5 argue in favor of an Over 1.5 bet.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

PSS Sleman holds a clear advantage: they average 2.43 goals per match versus Garudayaksa’s 1.15, win 64% of games compared to the visitors’ 38%, and have an xG of 1.66 against 1.45 with 6.07 shots on target versus 4.7, which favors the hosts to score first. At Half-Time, the home side led in 50% of matches and average 1.0 goals in the first half versus the visitors’ 0.69, so the most likely scenario is PSS leading after 45 minutes. In the Second Half PSS also dominates: they average 1.43 goals after the break while the visitors only average 0.46, and second-half goals average 1.71 vs 0.77, suggesting the lead will be maintained or extended. For these reasons I assign the highest probability to 1/1 (37%), with X/1 (18%) and X/X (14%) also realistic, while a full turnaround in favor of the visitors (2/2) is rated low at 3% due to their lower conversion rate of 10% and weaker second halves.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 2
First half
2 : 0
Second half

Game stats

58Possession (%)42
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
2Shots2
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
4Shots on target6
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
0.79xG0.74
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
6Corners0
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
51Dangerous attacks25
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
-1Fouls-1
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
6Cards3
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
2Goals scored / game1.81
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
0.7Goals allowed / game0.7
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
55%Average possession47%
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
4.81Shots on target / game4.78
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10.52Shots per game10.7
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
4.81Shots on target4.78
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
19%Shot conversion17%
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
55%Possession47%
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
1.34xG for1.57
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
0.84xG against1.17
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC

Shooting quality

PSS Sleman: Efficient finishingGarudayaksa FC: Counter-attacking
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
Accuracy (shots on target)46%45%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.420.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Garudayaksa FC is 10% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / game - PSS Sleman · 2.2 pts / game - Garudayaksa FC

PSS Sleman
WLWDW
Season result split
59% W30% D11% L
Season (W-D-L)
16-8-3
2.07 pts / game · goal difference +35
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
11-3-0
Last 5 at home
5-0-0
WWWWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.8Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 0.60BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Garudayaksa FC
DWDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
52% W37% D11% L
Season (W-D-L)
14-10-3
1.93 pts / game · goal difference +30
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
5-6-2
Last 5 away
1-3-1
DLDDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.43Opponent xG: 1.16BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

PSS Sleman is 10% better for: goals scored per game.

2 goals / game - PSS Sleman · 1.81 goals / game - Garudayaksa FC

PSS Sleman scoring profile: strong

PSS Sleman scores in 89% of games (24 of 27 meczów), while Garudayaksa FC keeps a clean sheet in 48% (13 of 27 meczów).

Garudayaksa FC scoring profile: strong

Garudayaksa FC scores in 78% of games (21 of 27 meczów), while PSS Sleman keeps a clean sheet in 37% (10 of 27 meczów).

54Goals scored (season)49
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
19Goals conceded (season)19
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
2.7Average goals per game2.52
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
14Goals scored (last 5)9
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
3Goals conceded (last 5)3
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC

How often they score at least...

89%1 goal78%
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
52%2 goals52%
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
33%3 goals22%
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
11%4 goals15%
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC

How often they concede at least...

63%1 goal52%
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
7%2 goals15%
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
0%3 goals4%
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
0%4 goals0%
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

50%
League average

Goal patterns

4%BTTS at half-time26%
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
0%BTTS in both halves0%
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
37%Scored in both halves37%
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC

BTTS and goal count

37%Min. 3 goals and BTTS30%
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
19%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
40%BTTS - last 540%
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

70%Min. 1 goal before half-time70%
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
19%Min. 2 goals before half-time37%
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC

2nd half

89%Min. 1 goal after half-time56%
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
56%Min. 2 goals after half-time30%
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time22%
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

PSS Sleman - half-time state
48% leading33% draw19% trailing
Garudayaksa FC - half-time state
44% leading44% draw11% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.78Points per game (1st half)1.78
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
0.78Goals scored (1st half)0.85
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
0.22Goals conceded (1st half)0.41
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
1Average goals (1st half)1.26
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
78%Clean sheet before half-time70%
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
48%No goal before half-time33%
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC

After half-time (2nd half)

1.93Points per game (2nd half)1.7
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
1.22Goals scored (2nd half)0.96
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
0.48Goals conceded (2nd half)0.3
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
1.7Average goals (2nd half)1.26
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
56%Clean sheet after half-time78%
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC
26%No goal after half-time52%
PSS SlemanGarudayaksa FC

PSS Sleman - second-half results

56% W26% D19% L
48
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
+15
Goal difference (1st half)
52
Second-half points
+20
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.78
PPG before half-time
Lead holding123%

Leads at halftime in 48% of games and wins 59%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Garudayaksa FC - second-half results

41% W48% D11% L
48
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
+12
Goal difference (1st half)
46
Second-half points
+18
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.78
PPG before half-time
Lead holding118%

Leads at halftime in 44% of games and wins 52%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

PSS Sleman - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.202.00
Goals scored / game1.21.6
Goals allowed / game0.00.6
Average goals per game1.22.2
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+6+5
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 6
Garudayaksa FC - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.201.60
Goals scored / game0.81.0
Goals allowed / game0.20.4
Average goals per game1.01.4
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+3+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

PSS Sleman
ScoredConceded
9
1
0-15
0
3
16-30
12
2
31-45
14
7
46-60
6
1
61-75
13
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (14 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

Garudayaksa FC
ScoredConceded
7
2
0-15
11
5
16-30
5
4
31-45
8
3
46-60
10
2
61-75
8
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (11 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.60
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.4 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
69%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

PSS Sleman

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.50
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.80
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-16.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.66
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
122%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
61%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Garudayaksa FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.40
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.71
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-18.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.47
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
157%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
43%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 2).

Teams vs league

PSS SlemanLigaGarudayaksa FC
Average goals per game 2.702.79 2.52
Both teams scored 59%50% 44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 56%49% 41%
Clean sheets 37%28% 48%
Goal before half-time 70%70% 70%
Goal after half-time 89%79% 56%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.79
Average goals per game
50%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.64
Home goals / game
1.15
Away goals / game
+43%
Home attack advantage
+30%
Home defensive advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PSS SlemanYellow cardEga Rizky Pramana
  2. Garudayaksa FCAssistKomang Tri Arta Wiguna
  3. Garudayaksa FCYellow cardBagus Nirwanto
  4. PSS SlemanYellow cardIrvan Yunus Mofu
  5. Garudayaksa FCSubstitutionOn: Sidik SaimimaOff: Asep Berlian
  6. PSS SlemanYellow cardIman Faturrahman
  7. Garudayaksa FCYellow cardSidik Saimima
  8. PSS SlemanSubstitutionOn: Jehan PahleviOff: Mohammad Saiful Djoge
  9. PSS SlemanYellow cardGustavo Henrique Barbosa Freire
  10. Garudayaksa FCSubstitutionOn: Manda CingiOff: Vytas Gašpuitis
  11. PSS SlemanYellow cardFrederic Injai
  12. PSS SlemanSubstitutionOn: Arda AlfarezaOff: Frederic Injai
  13. Garudayaksa FCYellow cardManda Cingi
  14. PSS SlemanYellow cardJunior Haqi

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of PSS Sleman vs Garudayaksa FC?

The Liga 2 match finished PSS Sleman 2:2 Garudayaksa FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before PSS Sleman vs Garudayaksa FC?

PSS Sleman score 2.00 goals per game on average and Garudayaksa FC 1.81. The Liga 2 average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 59% of PSS Sleman's matches and 44% of Garudayaksa FC's.

What form are PSS Sleman and Garudayaksa FC in?

Over the last 5 games PSS Sleman have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Garudayaksa FC 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for PSS Sleman vs Garudayaksa FC?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.