Indonesia - Liga 2Data current as of 17 July 2026

PSS Sleman vs Persela: match statistics

PSS Sleman crest
PSS Sleman
1 : 1half-time 1:0
Persela crest
Persela
165%(0.00)
X25%(0.00)
210%(0.00)

PSS Sleman is displaying impressive home form with an 86% win rate and just one draw in their home matches, scoring an average of 2 goals per game while conceding only 0.57. The hosts occupy a high 2nd position in the table and have earned 10 points in their last 5 matches overall, indicating consistent form. Persela, despite a decent position in the table, has managed only 3 points and scored just 2 goals in their last 5 matches, pointing to a significant decline in offensive form. The xG statistics also favor the hosts (1.6 vs 0.97), and their advantage in possession (55% vs 49%) confirms their dominance. Taking all these factors into account, a convincing victory for PSS Sleman is the most likely scenario, although the visitors' solid defense (50% clean sheets away) may prevent the match from being one-sided.

PSS Sleman vs Persela: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

PSS Sleman play Persela in Liga 2 (Indonesia). The match date is 18 January 2026 at 09:30. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

PSS Sleman: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Persela: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

PSS Sleman scores 2.00 and concedes 0.75 goals per match. Persela scores 1.26 and concedes 0.96. League average: 2.79 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: PSS Sleman 61%, Persela 48%. Over 2.5: PSS Sleman 57%, Persela 37%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 49%.

xG, shots and style

PSS Sleman has higher xG: 1.32 vs 1.11. PSS Sleman: 10.2 shots per match, Persela: 8.0.

Match halves

PSS Sleman: half-time lead 46%, second-half goals 1.25. Persela: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.89.

Goals by minute

PSS Sleman: 46-60 (14 goals). Persela: 76-90+ (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga 2: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 49%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 1-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.

Match description

PSS Sleman is displaying impressive home form with an 86% win rate and just one draw in their home matches, scoring an average of 2 goals per game while conceding only 0.57. The hosts occupy a high 2nd position in the table and have earned 10 points in their last 5 matches overall, indicating consistent form. Persela, despite a decent position in the table, has managed only 3 points and scored just 2 goals in their last 5 matches, pointing to a significant decline in offensive form. The xG statistics also favor the hosts (1.6 vs 0.97), and their advantage in possession (55% vs 49%) confirms their dominance. Taking all these factors into account, a convincing victory for PSS Sleman is the most likely scenario, although the visitors' solid defense (50% clean sheets away) may prevent the match from being one-sided.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

54Possession (%)46
PSS SlemanPersela
10Shots5
PSS SlemanPersela
5Shots on target3
PSS SlemanPersela
1.26xG0.83
PSS SlemanPersela
5Corners3
PSS SlemanPersela
39Dangerous attacks41
PSS SlemanPersela
13Fouls15
PSS SlemanPersela
1Cards2
PSS SlemanPersela

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2Goals scored / match1.26
PSS SlemanPersela
0.75Goals conceded / match0.96
PSS SlemanPersela
55%Average possession45%
PSS SlemanPersela
4.79Shots on target / match2.89
PSS SlemanPersela

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.21Shots per match7.96
PSS SlemanPersela
4.79Shots on target2.89
PSS SlemanPersela
19.6%Shot conversion15.8%
PSS SlemanPersela
55%Possession45%
PSS SlemanPersela
1.32xG for1.11
PSS SlemanPersela
0.84xG against1.45
PSS SlemanPersela

Shooting quality

PSS Sleman: Efficient finishingPersela: Counter-attacking
PSS SlemanPersela
Accuracy (shots on target)47%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.420.44

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

PSS Sleman
LWDWD
Season result split
57% W32% R11% P
Season (W-D-L)
16-9-3
2.04 pts / match · goal difference +35
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
11-4-0
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.05Opponent xG: 0.63BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Persela
WDWDL
Season result split
41% W30% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-8-8
1.52 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-5-4
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DLWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.29Opponent xG: 1.70BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

PSS Sleman is 59% better for: goals scored per match.

2 goals / match - PSS Sleman · 1.26 goals / match - Persela

PSS Sleman is 28% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.75 goals / match - PSS Sleman · 0.96 goals / match - Persela

PSS Sleman scoring profile: very strong

PSS Sleman scores in 89% of matches (25 of 28 matches), while Persela keeps a clean sheet in 30% (8 of 27 matches).

Persela scoring profile: strong

Persela scores in 67% of matches (18 of 27 matches), while PSS Sleman keeps a clean sheet in 36% (10 of 28 matches).

56Goals scored (season)34
PSS SlemanPersela
21Goals conceded (season)26
PSS SlemanPersela
2.75Average goals in match2.22
PSS SlemanPersela
9Goals scored (last 5)10
PSS SlemanPersela
5Goals conceded (last 5)8
PSS SlemanPersela

How often they score at least...

89%1 goal67%
PSS SlemanPersela
54%2 goals33%
PSS SlemanPersela
32%3 goals11%
PSS SlemanPersela
11%4 goals4%
PSS SlemanPersela

How often they concede at least...

64%1 goal70%
PSS SlemanPersela
11%2 goals15%
PSS SlemanPersela
0%3 goals4%
PSS SlemanPersela
0%4 goals4%
PSS SlemanPersela

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

51%
League average

Goal patterns

4%BTTS at half-time11%
PSS SlemanPersela
0%BTTS in both halves0%
PSS SlemanPersela
36%Scored in both halves19%
PSS SlemanPersela

BTTS and goal count

39%Min. 3 goals and BTTS30%
PSS SlemanPersela
18%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
PSS SlemanPersela
60%BTTS - last 560%
PSS SlemanPersela

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time52%
PSS SlemanPersela
21%Min. 2 goals before half-time15%
PSS SlemanPersela
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
PSS SlemanPersela

2nd half

89%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
PSS SlemanPersela
57%Min. 2 goals after half-time41%
PSS SlemanPersela
21%Min. 3 goals after half-time15%
PSS SlemanPersela

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

PSS Sleman is 44% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.71 pts / match - PSS Sleman · 1.19 pts / match - Persela

PSS Sleman - half-time state
46% leading32% draw21% trailing
Persela - half-time state
22% leading52% draw26% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.71Points per match (1st half)1.19
PSS SlemanPersela
0.75Goals scored (1st half)0.37
PSS SlemanPersela
0.29Goals conceded (1st half)0.41
PSS SlemanPersela
1.04Average goals (1st half)0.78
PSS SlemanPersela
75%Clean sheet before half-time63%
PSS SlemanPersela
50%No goal before half-time74%
PSS SlemanPersela

After half-time (2nd half)

1.96Points per match (2nd half)1.81
PSS SlemanPersela
1.25Goals scored (2nd half)0.89
PSS SlemanPersela
0.46Goals conceded (2nd half)0.56
PSS SlemanPersela
1.71Average goals (2nd half)1.44
PSS SlemanPersela
57%Clean sheet after half-time63%
PSS SlemanPersela
25%No goal after half-time41%
PSS SlemanPersela

PSS Sleman - second-half results

57% W25% R18% P
48
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
+13
Goal difference (1st half)
55
Second-half points
+22
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.71
PPG before half-time
Lead holding124%

Leads at half-time in 46% of matches and wins 57%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Persela - second-half results

52% W26% R22% P
32
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
49
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.19
PPG before half-time
Lead holding186%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

PSS Sleman - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.00
Goals scored / match0.41.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match0.82.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference0+4
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Persela - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.60
Goals scored / match0.61.4
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.22.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

PSS Sleman
ScoredConceded
9
1
0-15
0
4
16-30
12
3
31-45
14
7
46-60
7
1
61-75
14
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (14 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.

Persela
ScoredConceded
2
4
0-15
3
1
16-30
5
6
31-45
9
2
46-60
1
3
61-75
14
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.48
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
89%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-20%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
60%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

PSS Sleman

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.77
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-16.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.68
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
122%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
65%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.44
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Persela

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.64
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.49
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
110%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
59%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.08
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
41% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
41%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 2).

Teams vs league

PSS SlemanLigaPersela
Average goals in match 2.752.79 2.22
Both teams scored 61%51% 48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 57%49% 37%
Clean sheets 36%28% 30%
Goal before half-time 71%70% 52%
Goal after half-time 89%79% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.79
Average goals per match
51%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.64
Home goals / match
1.15
Away goals / match
+43%
Home attack advantage
+30%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): PSS Sleman 1 - 0 - 1 Persela. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Persatuan Sepak Bola Lamongan
0 : 1
Persatuan Sepakbola Sleman
Persatuan Sepak Bola Lamongan
2 : 1
Persatuan Sepakbola Sleman

FAQ

What was the result of PSS Sleman vs Persela?

The Liga 2 match finished PSS Sleman 1:1 Persela. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between PSS Sleman and Persela?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches PSS Sleman won 1, Persela won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before PSS Sleman vs Persela?

PSS Sleman score 2.00 goals per game on average and Persela 1.26. The Liga 2 average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 61% of PSS Sleman's matches and 48% of Persela's.

What form are PSS Sleman and Persela in?

Over the last 5 games PSS Sleman have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Persela 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for PSS Sleman vs Persela?

The statistical background for PSS Sleman vs Persela — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.