Indonesia - Liga 2Data current as of September 06, 2026

PSS Sleman vs Persipal: match statistics

PSS Sleman crest
PSS Sleman
7 : 0half-time 4:0
Persipal crest
Persipal

PSS Sleman vs Persipal: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

PSS Sleman played against Persipal in Liga 2 (Indonesia). The game was played on April 4, 2026. Final score: 7:0.

Recent form

PSS Sleman has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.20 points per game. Persipal has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses, with 0.20 points per game.

Scoring records

PSS Sleman scores 1.82 goals per game and allows 0.73. Persipal scores 0.59 and allows 2.68. Games in this league average 2.66 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 64% of PSS Sleman's games and 50% of Persipal's. The Over 2.5 rates are 55% and 64%, compared with league averages of 49% for BTTS and 47% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

PSS Sleman has the higher season xG average, 1.32 to 1.10 per game. PSS Sleman takes 10.3 shots per game, while Persipal takes 8.0.

First-half and second-half trends

PSS Sleman leads at halftime in 45% of its games and scores 1.14 goals per game after halftime. Persipal leads at halftime in 9% and scores 0.32 after halftime.

When the teams score

PSS Sleman's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). For Persipal, it is minutes 76-90+ (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Liga 2 games average 2.66 goals. Both teams score in 49% of games, and 47% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

PSS Sleman, as the league leader, shows dominant home form: 73% home wins, 0% home defeats, and on average 1.82 goals scored and 0.55 conceded per match, yielding a +14 goal difference in home games. Persipal has severe away problems: 0% away wins, 91% away defeats, an average of 0.45 goals scored and 3.36 conceded per away match, and an away goal difference of -32. In the last 5 matches PSS scored 7 and conceded 2, translating to an average of 2.2 points per match, while Persipal scored 4 and conceded 18, giving them 0.2 points per match. In terms of chance quality the hosts have average home xG of 1.43 versus visitors’ away xG of 0.85, 4.91 shots on target for PSS versus 2.64 for Persipal, and a conversion rate of 18% vs 7%, all favoring the hosts in chance creation and finishing. Considering these discrepancies in attack and defense (1.82/0.55 vs 0.45/3.36), Persipal’s lack of away wins and superior xG metrics for the hosts, I forecast a home victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I predict BTTS at 68% vs 32% because several strong data signals favor both teams scoring. The hosts have a seasonal BTTS rate of 64% and have scored 40 goals this season, while Persipal have conceded 59 goals this season and have 0% clean sheets, suggesting PSS Sleman has a realistic chance to score. The visitors have an 80% BTTS rate in their last 5 matches and conceded a total of 18 goals in those games (3.6 per match on average), and their seasonal goals conceded average is 3.36, which significantly increases the likelihood of Goal/Goal. PSS generates more chances: xG 1.36 vs 0.85 for Persipal, averaging 10.8 shots and 4.5 on target vs 6.18 and 2.64 for the opponents; although Persipal’s average goals scored are modest (0.45 for the season and 0.8 in the last 5), they still find the net frequently enough. Considering the hosts’ seasonal BTTS 64%, the visitors’ 80% BTTS in the last 5, Persipal’s high goals conceded (59 this season, 3.6 average in the last 5) and PSS’s advantage in chance creation, I select BTTS - Yes as the strongest signal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Based on xG, I expect about 1.70 goals for PSS Sleman (attacking xG 1.36 vs opponents’ xG conceded 2.03) and 1.31 for Persipal (attacking xG 0.85 vs hosts’ xG conceded 1.77), totaling ~3.01 expected goals. Season percentages show a strong signal for Over 1.5: PSS has 82% of matches with over 1.5 goals, Persipal 100%, while Over 2.5 occurred this season in 55% and 73% of matches respectively. In the last 5 games PSS scored 7 and conceded 2 (avg 1.4 scored, 0.4 conceded), whereas Persipal scored 4 and conceded 18 (avg 0.8 scored, 3.6 conceded), which significantly weakens their defense. Additionally PSS averages 10.8 shots with 4.5 on target, and Persipal 6.18 with 2.64 on target with conversion ~7% for both, supporting a higher number of goal-scoring situations; therefore the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (~90% probability), while Over 2.5 is also relevant (~68%) due to the sum xG ~3.01 and Persipal’s poor defense (seasonal 3.36 conceded, 18 conceded in the last 5).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Statistical analysis indicates a home advantage: PSS Sleman xG is 1.36 versus Persipal 0.85, and average shots 10.8 vs 6.18 with shots on target 4.5 vs 2.64 confirm superior chance creation (xG difference +0.51 and on average +4.62 shots). In the last 5 matches PSS form is W W D W D (60% wins), while Persipal is L L D L L (0% wins and 80% defeats), and the visitors concede on average 3.36 goals per match this season. At half-time a draw is most common: the home side records a half-time draw in 55% of season matches and 60% in the last 5, so we estimate about a 58% chance of a draw after 45 minutes. After the break the hosts are more active — PSS scores on average 1.0 goal in second halves in the last 5 matches, while Persipal concedes on average 2.6 goals in second halves over that period, therefore the most reliable signal is a half-time draw and a home win (X/1). Additionally, Persipal’s poor away efficiency (seasonal 0% away wins and 91% defeats for visitors) reduces the realistic chances of an away victory.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

4 : 0
First half
3 : 0
Second half

Game stats

61Possession (%)39
PSS SlemanPersipal
20Shots5
PSS SlemanPersipal
11Shots on target3
PSS SlemanPersipal
2.54xG0.63
PSS SlemanPersipal
8Corners2
PSS SlemanPersipal
71Dangerous attacks15
PSS SlemanPersipal
-1Fouls-1
PSS SlemanPersipal
0Cards1
PSS SlemanPersipal

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

PSS SlemanPersipal
1.82Goals scored / game0.59
PSS SlemanPersipal
0.73Goals allowed / game2.68
PSS SlemanPersipal
54%Average possession44%
PSS SlemanPersipal
4.82Shots on target / game3.32
PSS SlemanPersipal

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10.32Shots per game7.95
PSS SlemanPersipal
4.82Shots on target3.32
PSS SlemanPersipal
17.6%Shot conversion7.4%
PSS SlemanPersipal
54%Possession44%
PSS SlemanPersipal
1.32xG for1.1
PSS SlemanPersipal
0.9xG against1.9
PSS SlemanPersipal

Shooting quality

PSS Sleman: Efficient finishingPersipal: Balanced
PSS SlemanPersipal
Accuracy (shots on target)47%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.18

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

PSS Sleman is 1000% better for: last-5 form.

2.2 pts / game - PSS Sleman · 0.2 pts / game - Persipal

PSS Sleman
DWWWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
59% W32% R9% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-7-2
2.09 pts / game · goal difference +24
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-3-0
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
WDDWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.00Opponent xG: 0.63BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Persipal
LLDLL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
0% W32% R68% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-7-15
0.32 pts / game · goal difference -46
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-10
Last 5 away
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 3.6xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 2.14BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

PSS Sleman is 208% better for: goals scored per game.

1.82 goals / game - PSS Sleman · 0.59 goals / game - Persipal

PSS Sleman is 267% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.73 goals / game - PSS Sleman · 2.68 goals / game - Persipal

PSS Sleman scoring profile: very strong

PSS Sleman scores in 91% of games (20 of 22 meczów), while Persipal keeps a clean sheet in 9% (2 of 22 meczów).

Persipal scoring profile: mixed

Persipal scores in 50% of games (11 of 22 meczów), while PSS Sleman keeps a clean sheet in 36% (8 of 22 meczów).

40Goals scored (season)13
PSS SlemanPersipal
16Goals conceded (season)59
PSS SlemanPersipal
2.55Average goals per game3.27
PSS SlemanPersipal
7Goals scored (last 5)4
PSS SlemanPersipal
2Goals conceded (last 5)18
PSS SlemanPersipal

How often they score at least...

91%1 goal50%
PSS SlemanPersipal
50%2 goals9%
PSS SlemanPersipal
27%3 goals0%
PSS SlemanPersipal
9%4 goals0%
PSS SlemanPersipal

How often they concede at least...

64%1 goal91%
PSS SlemanPersipal
9%2 goals73%
PSS SlemanPersipal
0%3 goals59%
PSS SlemanPersipal
0%4 goals32%
PSS SlemanPersipal

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

49%
League average

Goal patterns

5%BTTS at half-time18%
PSS SlemanPersipal
0%BTTS in both halves5%
PSS SlemanPersipal
32%Scored in both halves9%
PSS SlemanPersipal

BTTS and goal count

41%Min. 3 goals and BTTS32%
PSS SlemanPersipal
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS32%
PSS SlemanPersipal
40%BTTS - last 580%
PSS SlemanPersipal

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

73%Min. 1 goal before half-time77%
PSS SlemanPersipal
18%Min. 2 goals before half-time41%
PSS SlemanPersipal
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
PSS SlemanPersipal

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
PSS SlemanPersipal
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time55%
PSS SlemanPersipal
18%Min. 3 goals after half-time32%
PSS SlemanPersipal

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

PSS Sleman is 163% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.68 pts / game - PSS Sleman · 0.64 pts / game - Persipal

PSS Sleman - half-time state
45% leading32% draw23% trailing
Persipal - half-time state
9% leading36% draw55% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.68Points per game (1st half)0.64
PSS SlemanPersipal
0.68Goals scored (1st half)0.27
PSS SlemanPersipal
0.27Goals conceded (1st half)1.09
PSS SlemanPersipal
0.95Average goals (1st half)1.36
PSS SlemanPersipal
73%Clean sheet before half-time32%
PSS SlemanPersipal
50%No goal before half-time73%
PSS SlemanPersipal

After half-time (2nd half)

1.91Points per game (2nd half)0.32
PSS SlemanPersipal
1.14Goals scored (2nd half)0.32
PSS SlemanPersipal
0.45Goals conceded (2nd half)1.59
PSS SlemanPersipal
1.59Average goals (2nd half)1.91
PSS SlemanPersipal
59%Clean sheet after half-time18%
PSS SlemanPersipal
27%No goal after half-time68%
PSS SlemanPersipal

PSS Sleman - second-half results

55% W27% R18% P
37
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
+15
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.68
PPG before half-time
Lead holding131%

Leads at halftime in 45% of games and wins 59%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Persipal - second-half results

0% W32% R68% P
14
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-18
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
-28
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.64
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at halftime in 9% of games and wins 0%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.5

Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

PSS Sleman - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.801.80
Goals scored / game0.41.0
Goals allowed / game0.00.4
Average goals per game0.41.4
1 goal40%60%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+2+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Persipal - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.600.20
Goals scored / game0.40.4
Goals allowed / game1.02.6
Average goals per game1.43.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet40%0%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-3-11
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

PSS Sleman
ScoredConceded
8
1
0-15
0
3
16-30
7
2
31-45
9
6
46-60
5
1
61-75
11
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

Persipal
ScoredConceded
0
7
0-15
3
4
16-30
3
13
31-45
3
7
46-60
0
10
61-75
4
18
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (18). Late-goal balance (76-90): -14 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.91
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
2.3 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
109%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+20%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
46%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

PSS Sleman

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.42
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.67
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.50
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
119%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
65%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

Persipal

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.80
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.51
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.78
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
52%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
175%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 2).

Teams vs league

PSS SlemanLigaPersipal
Average goals per game 2.552.66 3.27
Both teams scored 64%49% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 55%47% 64%
Clean sheets 36%30% 9%
Goal before half-time 73%68% 77%
Goal after half-time 86%77% 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.66
Average goals per game
49%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.53
Home goals / game
1.13
Away goals / game
+35%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defensive advantage
+16%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PSS SlemanGoalKevin Gomes
  2. PersipalYellow cardMohammad Jordan Zamorano
  3. PSS SlemanSubstitutionOn: Junior HaqiOff: Rico Simanjuntak
  4. PSS SlemanGoalMeru Kimura
  5. PSS SlemanSubstitutionOn: Muhammad Salman AlfaridOff: Kevin Gomes

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from PSS Sleman's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against Persipal. Games average 3.50 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

PSS Sleman
4 : 0
Persipal
Persipal
0 : 3
PSS Sleman

FAQ

What was the result of PSS Sleman vs Persipal?

The Liga 2 match finished PSS Sleman 7:0 Persipal. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between PSS Sleman and Persipal?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches PSS Sleman won 2, Persipal won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before PSS Sleman vs Persipal?

PSS Sleman score 1.82 goals per game on average and Persipal 0.59. The Liga 2 average is 2.66 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 64% of PSS Sleman's matches and 50% of Persipal's.

What form are PSS Sleman and Persipal in?

Over the last 5 games PSS Sleman have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Persipal 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for PSS Sleman vs Persipal?

The statistical background for PSS Sleman vs Persipal — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.