Indonesia - Liga 2Data current as of September 06, 2026

PSS Sleman vs PSIS Semarang: match statistics

PSS Sleman crest
PSS Sleman
3 : 0half-time 1:0
PSIS Semarang crest
PSIS Semarang

PSS Sleman vs PSIS Semarang: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

PSS Sleman played against PSIS Semarang in Liga 2 (Indonesia). The game was played on May 3, 2026. Final score: 3:0.

Recent form

PSS Sleman has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. PSIS Semarang has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

PSS Sleman scores 1.96 goals per game and allows 0.73. PSIS Semarang scores 0.85 and allows 1.81. Games in this league average 2.75 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 62% of PSS Sleman's games and 35% of PSIS Semarang's. The Over 2.5 rates are 54% and 46%, compared with league averages of 51% for BTTS and 48% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

PSS Sleman has the higher season xG average, 1.34 to 1.14 per game. PSS Sleman takes 10.6 shots per game, while PSIS Semarang takes 7.7.

First-half and second-half trends

PSS Sleman leads at halftime in 46% of its games and scores 1.19 goals per game after halftime. PSIS Semarang leads at halftime in 23% and scores 0.50 after halftime.

When the teams score

PSS Sleman's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (13 goals). For PSIS Semarang, it is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Liga 2 games average 2.75 goals. Both teams score in 51% of games, and 48% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

PSS Sleman is the clear favorite in this match: at home they score an average of 2.31 goals per game and concede only 0.54, with a 77% home win rate and 0% home losses. PSIS Semarang on the road average 0.77 goals scored and concede 1.69, with just a 15% away win rate and 54% away losses, which significantly weakens their chances. Quality and quantity of chances favor the hosts: average xG 1.54 vs 0.8, average shots 11.69 vs 5.75 and shots on target 5.31 vs 2.42 translate into conversion rates of 20% versus 13%. In the short term the hosts have scored 12 and conceded 4 in their last 5 matches, while the visitors have scored 11 and conceded 8, so PSS’s advantage is primarily defensive and in chance creation. On this basis I tip a home win; estimated probabilities: 72% for PSS Sleman, 16% for a draw, 12% for a PSIS win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Short-term form favors BTTS: in the last 5 matches both teams had BTTS in 60% of games, and over that period PSS Sleman averaged 2.4 goals scored and 0.8 conceded, while PSIS averaged 2.2 scored and 1.6 conceded. Season-long indicators are mixed — seasonal BTTS is 23% for the home side and 46% for the away side versus a league average of 50%, and season average goals scored are 0.92 for the home team and 0.77 for the away team. Both teams show weak defensive metrics over the longer term: PSS concedes 1.92 goals per match, PSIS 1.69, and xG values indicate the home side has xG for 1.52 with xG against 1.28, while the visitors have xG for 0.80 with xG against 1.69 — this suggests scoring opportunities at both ends. Offensively PSS generates more chances (avg. 4.92 shots on target and 11.08 shots per match) versus PSIS (2.42 shots on target and 5.75 shots), with the visitors having a higher conversion rate 13% vs 9%, and in the last 5 fixtures the two teams scored 12 and 11 goals respectively. Considering 60% BTTS in the last 5 matches for both sides, low season clean sheet percentages (23% for each) and average goals conceded of 1.92 and 1.69, I recommend BTTS - Yes with a probability of 65% against 35% for No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Based on xG, the home side has xG_for 1.52 versus the visitors’ xG_against 1.69, implying an expected ~1.61 goals for PSS, while the visitors have xG_for 0.80 versus the home xG_against 1.28, implying ~1.04 goals; total expected goals = 2.65. A Poisson model with λ=2.65 yields ~74% probability of Over 1.5 goals, ~50% for Over 2.5 and ~28% for Over 3.5, therefore the strongest signal is Over 1.5. Seasonally both teams have 69% of matches with over 1.5 goals, and Over 0.5 stands at 100% for the home side and 92% for the visitors, which further supports an expectation of at least two goals. The home team averages 11.08 shots and 4.92 on target per match versus the visitors’ 5.75 and 2.42, and in the last 5 matches PSS scored 12 goals (2.4 per game) and PSIS 11 goals (2.2 per game), confirming a higher volume of scoring opportunities. As a result I recommend betting Over 1.5 as the most justified market based on xG, shot numbers and recent form of both teams.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

In the first half the statistics favor PSIS to have the lead: PSS Sleman averages 0.31 goals scored and concedes 0.92 by half-time, and the home side were trailing in 62% of matches at the break; PSIS average 0.38 scored and 0.54 conceded in the first half. Based on this I assess the half-time distribution at roughly 55% guests leading, 27% draw and 18% hosts leading. However, after the break PSS have the advantage in creation and better second-half metrics: home xG 1.52 versus 0.80 for the visitors, on average 11.08 shots and 4.92 on target versus 5.75 and 2.42 for PSIS, and PSS score an average 0.62 goals after the break and collect 1.31 points in second halves versus 0.69 points for the visitors. For these reasons the strongest signal is the 2/1 scenario (guests lead at the break, hosts produce a turnaround and win) — I assign it 22% probability; second is 2/2 at 18%. Additionally, PSIS’s higher finishing rate (13% versus the hosts’ 9%) explains the early leads for the guests, while the hosts’ xG advantage and greater shot volume justify their ability to recover in the second half.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
2 : 0
Second half

Game stats

52Possession (%)48
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang
9Shots2
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang
6Shots on target0
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang
1.32xG0.33
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang
6Corners2
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang
46Dangerous attacks27
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang
-1Fouls-1
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang
1Cards3
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang
1.96Goals scored / game0.85
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang
0.73Goals allowed / game1.81
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang
55%Average possession46%
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang
4.77Shots on target / game3.31
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10.58Shots per game7.69
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang
4.77Shots on target3.31
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang
18.5%Shot conversion11%
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang
55%Possession46%
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang
1.34xG for1.14
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang
0.86xG against1.49
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang

Shooting quality

PSS Sleman: Efficient finishingPSIS Semarang: Balanced
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang
Accuracy (shots on target)45%43%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.410.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

PSS Sleman is 14% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / game - PSS Sleman · 1.4 pts / game - PSIS Semarang

PSS Sleman
DWLWD
Season result split
58% W31% R12% P
Season (W-D-L)
15-8-3
2.04 pts / game · goal difference +32
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
10-3-0
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
DWWWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.35Opponent xG: 0.74BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
PSIS Semarang
WLDLW
Season result split
23% W19% R58% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-5-15
0.88 pts / game · goal difference -25
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-4-7
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LWDDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.23Opponent xG: 1.28BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

PSS Sleman is 131% better for: goals scored per game.

1.96 goals / game - PSS Sleman · 0.85 goals / game - PSIS Semarang

PSS Sleman is 148% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.73 goals / game - PSS Sleman · 1.81 goals / game - PSIS Semarang

PSS Sleman scoring profile: very strong

PSS Sleman scores in 88% of games (23 of 26 meczów), while PSIS Semarang keeps a clean sheet in 23% (6 of 26 meczów).

PSIS Semarang scoring profile: mixed

PSIS Semarang scores in 54% of games (14 of 26 meczów), while PSS Sleman keeps a clean sheet in 35% (9 of 26 meczów).

51Goals scored (season)22
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang
19Goals conceded (season)47
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang
2.69Average goals per game2.65
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang
12Goals scored (last 5)11
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang
4Goals conceded (last 5)8
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang

How often they score at least...

88%1 goal54%
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang
50%2 goals12%
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang
31%3 goals8%
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang
12%4 goals4%
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang

How often they concede at least...

65%1 goal77%
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang
8%2 goals50%
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang
0%3 goals35%
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang
0%4 goals15%
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

51%
League average

Goal patterns

4%BTTS at half-time4%
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang
0%BTTS in both halves0%
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang
35%Scored in both halves12%
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS23%
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang
15%Min. 3 goals without BTTS23%
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang
60%BTTS - last 560%
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

69%Min. 1 goal before half-time77%
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang
19%Min. 2 goals before half-time27%
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time4%
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang

2nd half

88%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang
54%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang
23%Min. 3 goals after half-time15%
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

PSS Sleman is 80% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.73 pts / game - PSS Sleman · 0.96 pts / game - PSIS Semarang

PSS Sleman - half-time state
46% leading35% draw19% trailing
PSIS Semarang - half-time state
23% leading27% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.73Points per game (1st half)0.96
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang
0.77Goals scored (1st half)0.35
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang
0.23Goals conceded (1st half)0.73
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang
1Average goals (1st half)1.08
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang
77%Clean sheet before half-time46%
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang
50%No goal before half-time73%
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang

After half-time (2nd half)

1.88Points per game (2nd half)1
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang
1.19Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)1.08
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang
1.69Average goals (2nd half)1.58
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang
54%Clean sheet after half-time46%
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang
27%No goal after half-time62%
PSS SlemanPSIS Semarang

PSS Sleman - second-half results

54% W27% R19% P
45
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
+14
Goal difference (1st half)
49
Second-half points
+18
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.73
PPG before half-time
Lead holding126%

Leads at halftime in 46% of games and wins 58%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

PSIS Semarang - second-half results

23% W31% R46% P
25
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
-15
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.96
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 23% of games and wins 23%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

PSS Sleman - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.801.60
Goals scored / game1.01.4
Goals allowed / game0.00.8
Average goals per game1.02.2
1 goal40%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet100%20%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+5+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5
PSIS Semarang - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.401.40
Goals scored / game0.81.4
Goals allowed / game0.41.2
Average goals per game1.22.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+2+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

PSS Sleman
ScoredConceded
9
1
0-15
0
3
16-30
11
2
31-45
13
7
46-60
6
1
61-75
12
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (13 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

PSIS Semarang
ScoredConceded
0
6
0-15
5
5
16-30
4
8
31-45
3
5
46-60
3
5
61-75
7
18
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (18). Late-goal balance (76-90): -11 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.67
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.9 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
49%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+50%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

PSS Sleman

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.75
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-15.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.62
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
122%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
63%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.44
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

PSIS Semarang

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.35
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.61
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+9.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.32
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
74%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
113%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.52
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 2).

Teams vs league

PSS SlemanLigaPSIS Semarang
Average goals per game 2.692.75 2.65
Both teams scored 62%51% 35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 54%48% 46%
Clean sheets 35%28% 23%
Goal before half-time 69%69% 77%
Goal after half-time 88%79% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.75
Average goals per game
51%
Both teams scored
48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.60
Home goals / game
1.15
Away goals / game
+39%
Home attack advantage
+28%
Home defensive advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PSIS SemarangYellow cardMuhammad Hidayat
  2. PSIS SemarangYellow cardOtavio Dutra
  3. PSS SlemanYellow cardGustavo Henrique Barbosa Freire
  4. PSS SlemanGoalJunior Haqi
  5. PSS SlemanSubstitutionOn: Arda AlfarezaOff: Figo Dennis Saputrananto
  6. PSIS SemarangSubstitutionOn: Wawan FebriantoOff: Denilson Rodrigues Roldão
  7. PSIS SemarangYellow cardWawan Febrianto
  8. PSS SlemanGoalArda Alfareza

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from PSS Sleman's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against PSIS Semarang. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

PSS Sleman
2 : 1
PSIS Semarang
PSIS Semarang
0 : 5
PSS Sleman

FAQ

What was the result of PSS Sleman vs PSIS Semarang?

The Liga 2 match finished PSS Sleman 3:0 PSIS Semarang. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between PSS Sleman and PSIS Semarang?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches PSS Sleman won 2, PSIS Semarang won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before PSS Sleman vs PSIS Semarang?

PSS Sleman score 1.96 goals per game on average and PSIS Semarang 0.85. The Liga 2 average is 2.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 62% of PSS Sleman's matches and 35% of PSIS Semarang's.

What form are PSS Sleman and PSIS Semarang in?

Over the last 5 games PSS Sleman have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and PSIS Semarang 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for PSS Sleman vs PSIS Semarang?

The statistical background for PSS Sleman vs PSIS Semarang — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.