Pulau Pinang vs PDRM: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Pulau Pinang played against PDRM in Super League (Malaysia). The game was played on December 19, 2025. Final score: 3:0.

Recent form

Pulau Pinang has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. PDRM has 0 wins, 0 draws and 5 losses, with 0.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Pulau Pinang scores 0.80 goals per game and allows 2.40. PDRM scores 0.90 and allows 3.10. Games in this league average 3.46 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 60% of Pulau Pinang's games and 50% of PDRM's. The Over 2.5 rates are 60% and 80%, compared with league averages of 48% for BTTS and 66% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Pulau Pinang has the higher season xG average, 1.46 to 1.08 per game. Pulau Pinang takes 13.8 shots per game, while PDRM takes 7.7.

First-half and second-half trends

Pulau Pinang leads at halftime in 30% of its games and scores 0.20 goals per game after halftime. PDRM leads at halftime in 20% and scores 0.60 after halftime.

When the teams score

Pulau Pinang's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (2 goals). For PDRM, it is minutes 61-75 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Super League games average 3.46 goals. Both teams score in 48% of games, and 66% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
2 : 0
Second half

Game stats

62Possession (%)38
Pulau PinangPDRM
29Shots3
Pulau PinangPDRM
9Shots on target1
Pulau PinangPDRM
2.93xG0.47
Pulau PinangPDRM
3Corners8
Pulau PinangPDRM
68Dangerous attacks27
Pulau PinangPDRM
8Fouls7
Pulau PinangPDRM
0Cards3
Pulau PinangPDRM

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

0.8Goals scored / game0.9
Pulau PinangPDRM
2.4Goals allowed / game3.1
Pulau PinangPDRM
46%Average possession49%
Pulau PinangPDRM
3.6Shots on target / game3
Pulau PinangPDRM

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

13.8Shots per game7.7
Pulau PinangPDRM
3.6Shots on target3
Pulau PinangPDRM
5.8%Shot conversion11.7%
Pulau PinangPDRM
46%Possession49%
Pulau PinangPDRM
1.46xG for1.08
Pulau PinangPDRM
1.9xG against1.94
Pulau PinangPDRM

Shooting quality

Pulau Pinang: BalancedPDRM: Balanced
Pulau PinangPDRM
Accuracy (shots on target)26%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.220.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Pulau Pinang
WDLLL
Season result split
10% W20% R70% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-7
0.50 pts / game · goal difference -16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-5
Last 5 at home
1-0-4
LLWLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.64Opponent xG: 1.52BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
PDRM
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
10% W30% R60% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-3-6
0.60 pts / game · goal difference -22
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-3
Last 5 away
0-1-3
DLLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 4.6xG: 0.84Opponent xG: 2.31BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

PDRM is 13% better for: goals scored per game.

0.8 goals / game - Pulau Pinang · 0.9 goals / game - PDRM

Pulau Pinang is 29% better for: goals allowed per game.

2.4 goals / game - Pulau Pinang · 3.1 goals / game - PDRM

Pulau Pinang scoring profile: very strong

Pulau Pinang scores in 60% of games (6 of 10 meczów), while PDRM keeps a clean sheet in 10% (1 of 10 meczów).

PDRM scoring profile: very strong

PDRM scores in 50% of games (5 of 10 meczów), while Pulau Pinang keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 10 meczów).

8Goals scored (season)9
Pulau PinangPDRM
24Goals conceded (season)31
Pulau PinangPDRM
3.2Average goals per game4
Pulau PinangPDRM
6Goals scored (last 5)1
Pulau PinangPDRM
11Goals conceded (last 5)23
Pulau PinangPDRM

How often they score at least...

60%1 goal50%
Pulau PinangPDRM
20%2 goals30%
Pulau PinangPDRM
0%3 goals10%
Pulau PinangPDRM
0%4 goals0%
Pulau PinangPDRM

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal90%
Pulau PinangPDRM
50%2 goals80%
Pulau PinangPDRM
40%3 goals50%
Pulau PinangPDRM
20%4 goals40%
Pulau PinangPDRM

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

30%BTTS at half-time10%
Pulau PinangPDRM
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Pulau PinangPDRM
10%Scored in both halves20%
Pulau PinangPDRM

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Pulau PinangPDRM
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS30%
Pulau PinangPDRM
80%BTTS - last 520%
Pulau PinangPDRM

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
Pulau PinangPDRM
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
Pulau PinangPDRM
30%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
Pulau PinangPDRM

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time90%
Pulau PinangPDRM
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time70%
Pulau PinangPDRM
10%Min. 3 goals after half-time50%
Pulau PinangPDRM

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Pulau Pinang is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.2 pts / game - Pulau Pinang · 0.8 pts / game - PDRM

Pulau Pinang - half-time state
30% leading30% draw40% trailing
PDRM - half-time state
20% leading20% draw60% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.2Points per game (1st half)0.8
Pulau PinangPDRM
0.6Goals scored (1st half)0.3
Pulau PinangPDRM
1.2Goals conceded (1st half)1.3
Pulau PinangPDRM
1.8Average goals (1st half)1.6
Pulau PinangPDRM
40%Clean sheet before half-time30%
Pulau PinangPDRM
50%No goal before half-time80%
Pulau PinangPDRM

After half-time (2nd half)

0.4Points per game (2nd half)0.7
Pulau PinangPDRM
0.2Goals scored (2nd half)0.6
Pulau PinangPDRM
1.2Goals conceded (2nd half)1.8
Pulau PinangPDRM
1.4Average goals (2nd half)2.4
Pulau PinangPDRM
20%Clean sheet after half-time30%
Pulau PinangPDRM
80%No goal after half-time50%
Pulau PinangPDRM

Pulau Pinang - second-half results

0% W40% R60% P
12
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding33%

Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 10%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

PDRM - second-half results

20% W10% R70% P
8
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
-12
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.80
PPG before half-time
Lead holding50%

Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 10%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.5

Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Pulau Pinang - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.600.40
Goals scored / game1.00.2
Goals allowed / game1.01.2
Average goals per game2.01.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal20%80%
Goal difference0-5
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 5
PDRM - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.200.00
Goals scored / game0.00.2
Goals allowed / game1.82.8
Average goals per game1.83.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet20%0%
No goal100%80%
Goal difference-9-13
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 0% draw - 100% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Pulau Pinang
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
2
4
16-30
2
6
31-45
2
6
46-60
0
3
61-75
0
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

PDRM
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
1
4
16-30
1
6
31-45
2
7
46-60
3
3
61-75
1
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.60
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
2.0 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
30%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
20%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Pulau Pinang

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.44
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.66
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.50
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
42%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
156%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

PDRM

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.86
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.34
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-1.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
58%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
161%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.60
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
11% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
11%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League).

Teams vs league

Pulau PinangLigaPDRM
Average goals per game 3.203.46 4.00
Both teams scored 60%48% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 60%66% 80%
Clean sheets 0%28% 10%
Goal before half-time 80%75% 80%
Goal after half-time 80%86% 90%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.46
Average goals per game
48%
Both teams scored
66%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.92
Home goals / game
1.54
Away goals / game
+25%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defensive advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
14%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
86%
1 goal
55%
2 goals
31%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

FAQ

What was the result of Pulau Pinang vs PDRM?

The Super League match finished Pulau Pinang 3:0 PDRM. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Pulau Pinang vs PDRM?

Pulau Pinang score 0.80 goals per game on average and PDRM 0.90. The Super League average is 3.46 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Pulau Pinang's matches and 50% of PDRM's.

What form are Pulau Pinang and PDRM in?

Over the last 5 games Pulau Pinang have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and PDRM 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pulau Pinang vs PDRM?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Pulau Pinang vs PDRM: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.