Pumas UNAM vs Juárez: match statistics
Pumas UNAM vs Juárez: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Pumas UNAM play Juárez in Liga MX (Mexico). The match date is 22 April 2026 at 03:00. Final score: 4:2.
Current form
Pumas UNAM: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Juárez: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Pumas UNAM scores 1.63 and concedes 1.32 goals per match. Juárez scores 1.50 and concedes 1.74. League average: 2.91 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Pumas UNAM 63%, Juárez 82%. Over 2.5: Pumas UNAM 49%, Juárez 68%. League level: BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 55%.
xG, shots and style
Juárez has higher xG: 1.34 vs 1.28. Pumas UNAM: 11.7 shots per match, Juárez: 12.3.
Match halves
Pumas UNAM: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 0.73. Juárez: half-time lead 37%, second-half goals 0.76.
Goals by minute
Pumas UNAM: 31-45+ (16 goals). Juárez: 76-90+ (18 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Liga MX: 2.91 goals per match, BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 55%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.
Match description
Pumas UNAM are favorites for this match: in their last five fixtures they have a record of 3 wins and 2 draws, scoring 10 goals, whereas Juárez have 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses with 6 goals; over this period the home side average 2.2 points per game versus 1.0 for the visitors. In attack Pumas score at home on average 1.63 goals per game with xG 1.4 and 4.19 shots on target, while Juárez away average 1.22 goals, xG 1.24 and 3.67 shots on target, with a conversion rate of 13% versus 11%. Defensively the home advantage is clear: Pumas concede 1.06 goals per home game and keep 31% clean sheets, whereas Juárez concede 1.78 goals on the road and have only 6% clean sheets. Additionally Pumas dominate possession (54% vs 46%), in shot volume (12.75 vs 11.28) and have a superior home record (goal difference +9 vs Juárez’s -10 away), which together give them a tangible edge and support backing the home win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Pumas UNAM | Juárez | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.43 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Pumas UNAM is 25% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Pumas UNAM · 0.8 pts / match - Juárez
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Pumas UNAM is 9% better for: goals scored per match.
1.63 goals / match - Pumas UNAM · 1.5 goals / match - Juárez
Pumas UNAM is 32% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.32 goals / match - Pumas UNAM · 1.74 goals / match - Juárez
Pumas UNAM scores in 88% of matches (36 of 41 matches), while Juárez keeps a clean sheet in 8% (3 of 38 matches).
Juárez scores in 87% of matches (33 of 38 matches), while Pumas UNAM keeps a clean sheet in 29% (12 of 41 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Pumas UNAM
Over / Under — Juárez
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Pumas UNAM is 12% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.56 pts / match - Pumas UNAM · 1.39 pts / match - Juárez
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Pumas UNAM - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Juárez - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 37% of matches and wins 32%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (16 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (18 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Pumas UNAM
Juárez
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga MX).
Teams vs league
| Pumas UNAM | Liga | Juárez | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.95 | 2.91 | ▲ 3.24 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 63% | 59% | ▲ 82% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 49% | 55% | ▲ 68% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 29% | 24% | ▼ 8% |
| Goal before half-time | • 71% | 72% | ▲ 79% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 78% | 76% | ▲ 84% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Pumas UNAM 0 - 0 - 1 Juárez. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Pumas UNAM vs Juárez?
The Liga MX match finished Pumas UNAM 4:2 Juárez. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Pumas UNAM vs Juárez?
Pumas UNAM score 1.63 goals per game on average and Juárez 1.50. The Liga MX average is 2.91 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Pumas UNAM's matches and 82% of Juárez's.
What form are Pumas UNAM and Juárez in?
Over the last 5 games Pumas UNAM have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Juárez 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pumas UNAM vs Juárez?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.