Puskás vs MTK: match statistics
Puskás vs MTK: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Puskás played against MTK in NB I (Hungary). The game was played on May 15, 2026. Final score: 2:2.
Recent form
Puskás has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. MTK has 2 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Puskás scores 1.28 goals per game and allows 1.28. MTK scores 1.66 and allows 1.88. Games in this league average 3.00 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 63% of Puskás's games and 66% of MTK's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 69%, compared with league averages of 60% for BTTS and 59% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
MTK has the higher season xG average, 1.56 to 1.55 per game. Puskás takes 13.0 shots per game, while MTK takes 13.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Puskás leads at halftime in 22% of its games and scores 0.69 goals per game after halftime. MTK leads at halftime in 22% and scores 1.06 after halftime.
When the teams score
Puskás's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). For MTK, it is minutes 76-90+ (13 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
NB I games average 3.00 goals. Both teams score in 60% of games, and 59% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 2 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Puskás holds a defensive and home advantage: the hosts concede an average of 1.47 goals at home, while MTK concedes 2.07 goals away, giving Puskás a better chance to preserve the result. Offensively the hosts generate higher xG at home (average xG 1.79 vs 1.42 xG for MTK on the road) and average 14.93 shots with 5.13 on target per match, versus 12.13 and 4.33 for the visitors. MTK, however, has a noticeably higher goal tally this season (53 goals vs 41 for Puskás) and scored 8 goals in the last 5 matches, averaging 1.6 points per match compared to 7 goals and 1.2 points for Puskás, which gives them some momentum. Additionally, Puskás less frequently fail to score (FTS 20% at home vs 33% for MTK away) and more often keep clean sheets (20% vs 13%), so with the balance of offense and defense considered I predict a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams show high season BTTS rates: Puskás 65% and MTK 67%, with league BTTS at 60%, yielding a baseline average around 64%. Goal metrics indicate Puskás scores 2.18 goals per match (xG 1.70), while MTK concedes 2.07 goals per match (xG against 1.98), favoring home goals. MTK scores 1.07 goals per match seasonally (xG 1.42) and Puskás concedes 1.71 goals per match; in the last 5 fixtures Puskás have scored 7 and conceded 8, while MTK have scored 8 and conceded 5, evidencing goal exchange. Additionally, MTK has only 13% clean sheets this season (Puskás 29%) and both sides have high over 2.5 goal shares: 71% for the home team and 67% for the away team, which increases the likelihood of both teams scoring. On this basis I back BTTS - Yes with a 76% probability versus 24% for No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG and defensive metrics analysis indicates significant goal potential: Puskás xG is 1.70 versus MTK 1.42, and averaging with opponents' xG yields a forecast of 1.84 goals for the home side and 1.55 for the away side, totaling 3.39. Seasonally Puskás has 71% of matches Over 2.5 goals, MTK 67%, and in the last 5 matches MTK produced Over 2.5 in 80% of cases, which raises the expectation of at least three goals. Additionally both teams show high BTTS rates: 65% (Puskás) and 67% (MTK), and Puskás at home averages 14.53 shots and 5.41 on target with a 15% conversion, increasing the likelihood of scoring opportunities. A Poisson model with a combined expectation of 3.39 suggests roughly a 66% chance of Over 2.5 (34% Under 2.5), so the strongest signal from the data is to play the over at the 2.5 line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Puskás holds a clear offensive advantage: they average 2.18 goals per home match versus MTK’s 1.07 away, the home side’s xG is 1.70 compared to the visitors’ 1.42, and shot conversion rates are 15% vs 9%. In the first half Puskás averages 0.82 goals, historically leading at the break in 29% of matches (in the last 5 — 40%, i.e. 2 of 5), while MTK has only a 13% historical rate of leading at the break and 20% in the last 5. In the second half the hosts also dominate: they score an average of 1.35 goals after the interval versus MTK’s 0.73 and have a positive second-half goal difference of +10 compared to the visitors’ -8, which increases the likelihood of maintaining or extending a lead. Although both teams often score (in 65% of Puskás matches and 67% of MTK matches), the hosts’ superiority in chance creation and finishing, combined with a stronger second half, supports a Half-Time/Full-Time scenario of leading at the break and winning after 90 minutes (1/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Puskás | MTK | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
MTK is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - Puskás · 1.8 pts / game - MTK
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
MTK is 30% better for: goals scored per game.
1.28 goals / game - Puskás · 1.66 goals / game - MTK
Puskás is 47% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.28 goals / game - Puskás · 1.88 goals / game - MTK
Puskás scores in 81% of games (26 of 32 meczów), while MTK keeps a clean sheet in 22% (7 of 32 meczów).
MTK scores in 81% of games (26 of 32 meczów), while Puskás keeps a clean sheet in 22% (7 of 32 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Puskás
Over / Under - MTK
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Puskás is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.03 pts / game - Puskás · 0.97 pts / game - MTK
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Puskás - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 41%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
MTK - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 28%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Puskás
MTK
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NB I).
Teams vs league
| Puskás | Liga | MTK | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.56 | 3.00 | ▲ 3.53 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 63% | 60% | ▲ 66% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 59% | ▲ 69% |
| Clean sheets | • 22% | 22% | • 22% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 81% | 70% | ▲ 78% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 72% | 87% | ▲ 94% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Puskás's perspective: 0 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses against MTK. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Puskás vs MTK?
The NB I match finished Puskás 2:2 MTK. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Puskás and MTK?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Puskás won 0, MTK won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Puskás vs MTK?
Puskás score 1.28 goals per game on average and MTK 1.66. The NB I average is 3.00 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Puskás's matches and 66% of MTK's.
What form are Puskás and MTK in?
Over the last 5 games Puskás have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and MTK 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Puskás vs MTK?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


