Egypt - Egyptian Premier LeagueData current as of September 13, 2026

Pyramids FC vs Ceramica Cleopatra: match statistics

155%(1.94)
X25%(2.81)
220%(4.30)

Pyramids FC displays impressive home form with a 75% win rate at home and only 13% losses, confirming their dominance at their own stadium. The hosts have an advantage in the average goals scored in home matches (1.75) and maintain a solid defense, conceding an average of just 0.5 goals per match. Ceramica Cleopatra, despite being the league leaders, shows weaker away form with a 50% win rate and 25% losses, and their last five overall matches have yielded only an average of 1.8 points per game. xG statistics indicate Pyramids' superiority (1.86 xG For vs the visitors' 1.08 xG For in away matches), suggesting a higher quality of chances created. Considering the hosts' excellent recent run (4 wins in the last 5 matches) and their ball possession dominance (68%), Pyramids FC has a real chance of victory, although Ceramica Cleopatra's quality does not rule out a draw.

Pyramids FC vs Ceramica Cleopatra: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Pyramids FC played against Ceramica Cleopatra in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The game was played on February 20, 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Recent form

Pyramids FC has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Ceramica Cleopatra has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Pyramids FC scores 1.67 goals per game and allows 0.80. Ceramica Cleopatra scores 1.56 and allows 0.69. Games in this league average 2.00 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 53% of Pyramids FC's games and 31% of Ceramica Cleopatra's. The Over 2.5 rates are 53% and 31%, compared with league averages of 46% for BTTS and 33% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Pyramids FC has the higher season xG average, 1.71 to 1.24 per game. Pyramids FC takes 15.1 shots per game, while Ceramica Cleopatra takes 10.8.

First-half and second-half trends

Pyramids FC leads at halftime in 47% of its games and scores 0.93 goals per game after halftime. Ceramica Cleopatra leads at halftime in 31% and scores 1.00 after halftime.

When the teams score

Pyramids FC's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (7 goals). For Ceramica Cleopatra, it is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Egyptian Premier League games average 2.00 goals. Both teams score in 46% of games, and 33% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Pyramids FC displays impressive home form with a 75% win rate at home and only 13% losses, confirming their dominance at their own stadium. The hosts have an advantage in the average goals scored in home matches (1.75) and maintain a solid defense, conceding an average of just 0.5 goals per match. Ceramica Cleopatra, despite being the league leaders, shows weaker away form with a 50% win rate and 25% losses, and their last five overall matches have yielded only an average of 1.8 points per game. xG statistics indicate Pyramids' superiority (1.86 xG For vs the visitors' 1.08 xG For in away matches), suggesting a higher quality of chances created. Considering the hosts' excellent recent run (4 wins in the last 5 matches) and their ball possession dominance (68%), Pyramids FC has a real chance of victory, although Ceramica Cleopatra's quality does not rule out a draw.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

60Possession (%)40
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
23Shots4
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
11Shots on target0
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
0xG0
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
9Corners2
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
0Dangerous attacks0
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
13Fouls7
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
2Cards2
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
1.67Goals scored / game1.56
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
0.8Goals allowed / game0.69
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
62%Average possession61%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
5.4Shots on target / game4.19
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

15.07Shots per game10.81
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
5.4Shots on target4.19
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
11.1%Shot conversion14.5%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
62%Possession61%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
1.71xG for1.24
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
0.74xG against1.25
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra

Shooting quality

Pyramids FC: DominantCeramica Cleopatra: Efficient finishing
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
Accuracy (shots on target)36%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Ceramica Cleopatra is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / game - Pyramids FC · 2.4 pts / game - Ceramica Cleopatra

Pyramids FC
WDDLW
Season result split
60% W27% D13% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-4-2
2.07 pts / game · goal difference +13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-1-1
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWWWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.89Opponent xG: 0.85BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%
Ceramica Cleopatra
WWWLW
Season result split
69% W13% D19% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-2-3
2.19 pts / game · goal difference +14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
4-2-2
Last 5 away
3-1-1
DWWWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.61Opponent xG: 1.25BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Pyramids FC is 7% better for: goals scored per game.

1.67 goals / game - Pyramids FC · 1.56 goals / game - Ceramica Cleopatra

Ceramica Cleopatra is 16% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.8 goals / game - Pyramids FC · 0.69 goals / game - Ceramica Cleopatra

Pyramids FC scoring profile: strong

Pyramids FC scores in 93% of games (14 of 15 meczów), while Ceramica Cleopatra keeps a clean sheet in 56% (9 of 16 meczów).

Ceramica Cleopatra scoring profile: strong

Ceramica Cleopatra scores in 81% of games (13 of 16 meczów), while Pyramids FC keeps a clean sheet in 47% (7 of 15 meczów).

25Goals scored (season)25
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
12Goals conceded (season)11
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
2.47Average goals per game2.25
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
8Goals scored (last 5)12
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
7Goals conceded (last 5)7
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra

How often they score at least...

93%1 goal81%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
60%2 goals56%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
7%3 goals19%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
7%4 goals0%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra

How often they concede at least...

53%1 goal44%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
27%2 goals19%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
0%3 goals6%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
0%4 goals0%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

31%
Ceramica Cleopatra - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.5 of 16 meczów
46%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time19%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
7%BTTS in both halves13%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
53%Scored in both halves31%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
100%BTTS - last 580%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

73%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
27%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time19%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra

2nd half

87%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
47%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Pyramids FC is 30% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.87 pts / game - Pyramids FC · 1.44 pts / game - Ceramica Cleopatra

Pyramids FC - half-time state
47% leading47% draw7% trailing
Ceramica Cleopatra - half-time state
31% leading50% draw19% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.87Points per game (1st half)1.44
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
0.73Goals scored (1st half)0.56
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
0.27Goals conceded (1st half)0.38
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
1Average goals (1st half)0.94
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
73%Clean sheet before half-time69%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
33%No goal before half-time63%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra

After half-time (2nd half)

1.8Points per game (2nd half)2.06
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
0.93Goals scored (2nd half)1
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
0.53Goals conceded (2nd half)0.31
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
1.47Average goals (2nd half)1.31
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
53%Clean sheet after half-time75%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra
20%No goal after half-time25%
Pyramids FCCeramica Cleopatra

Pyramids FC - second-half results

47% W40% D13% L
28
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.87
PPG before half-time
Lead holding128%

Leads at halftime in 47% of games and wins 60%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Ceramica Cleopatra - second-half results

56% W38% D6% L
23
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
+11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.44
PPG before half-time
Lead holding223%

Leads at halftime in 31% of games and wins 69%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Pyramids FC - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.401.20
Goals scored / game0.80.8
Goals allowed / game0.60.8
Average goals per game1.41.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 4
Ceramica Cleopatra - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.402.20
Goals scored / game1.01.4
Goals allowed / game1.00.4
Average goals per game2.01.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals60%0%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference0+5
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Pyramids FC
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
3
0
16-30
5
2
31-45
2
4
46-60
7
1
61-75
5
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Ceramica Cleopatra
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
3
3
16-30
5
3
31-45
4
1
46-60
5
1
61-75
7
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.36
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.2 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
118%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
42%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
75%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Pyramids FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.97
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.10
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
164%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
82%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.47
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Ceramica Cleopatra

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.88
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.32
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.56
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
159%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
68%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.21
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).

Teams vs league

Pyramids FCLigaCeramica Cleopatra
Average goals per game 2.472.00 2.25
Both teams scored 53%46% 31%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%33% 31%
Clean sheets 47%35% 56%
Goal before half-time 73%57% 50%
Goal after half-time 87%68% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.00
Average goals per game
46%
Both teams scored
33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
35%
Clean sheets
1.02
Home goals / game
0.98
Away goals / game
+4%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defensive advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
57%
1 goal
20%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Ceramica CleopatraYellow cardAmr Mahmoud Kalawa
  2. Pyramids FCYellow cardKarim Hafez Ramadan
  3. Ceramica CleopatraYellow cardAmr Mahmoud Kalawa
  4. Pyramids FCYellow cardAhmed Samy
  5. Ceramica CleopatraSubstitutionOn: Ibrahim Ali MohamedOff: Sodiq Ougola
  6. Pyramids FCSubstitutionOn: Nasser MaherOff: Karim Hafez Ramadan
  7. Pyramids FCSubstitutionOn: Osama Galal ToeimaOff: Mohamed Chibi
  8. Pyramids FCSubstitutionOn: Marwan HamdyOff: Fiston Kalala Mayele

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Mohamed MaaroufMatches officiated: 18
3.83Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 250%Home wins17%Draws33%Away wins

FAQ

What was the result of Pyramids FC vs Ceramica Cleopatra?

The Egyptian Premier League match finished Pyramids FC 1:0 Ceramica Cleopatra. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Pyramids FC vs Ceramica Cleopatra?

Pyramids FC score 1.67 goals per game on average and Ceramica Cleopatra 1.56. The Egyptian Premier League average is 2.00 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 33% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Pyramids FC's matches and 31% of Ceramica Cleopatra's.

What form are Pyramids FC and Ceramica Cleopatra in?

Over the last 5 games Pyramids FC have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Ceramica Cleopatra 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pyramids FC vs Ceramica Cleopatra?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Pyramids FC vs Ceramica Cleopatra: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.