Pyunik vs Banants: match statistics
Pyunik vs Banants: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Pyunik play Banants in Armenian Premier League (Armenia). The match date is 23 April 2026 at 16:00. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Pyunik: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Banants: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Pyunik scores 1.37 and concedes 0.67 goals per match. Banants scores 1.59 and concedes 0.96. League average: 2.56 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Pyunik 37%, Banants 41%. Over 2.5: Pyunik 37%, Banants 41%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 46%.
xG, shots and style
Pyunik has higher xG: 1.61 vs 1.31. Pyunik: 13.5 shots per match, Banants: 10.9.
Match halves
Pyunik: half-time lead 41%, second-half goals 0.78. Banants: half-time lead 41%, second-half goals 0.93.
Goals by minute
Pyunik: 76-90+ (9 goals). Banants: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Armenian Premier League: 2.56 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 46%.
Head-to-head
2 H2H matches: 0-1-1. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 100%.
Match description
The match favorite is the home side: Pyunik win 78% of home games, score on average 1.89 goals, generate xG 1.66 and register 5.44 shots on target from 13.67 attempts per match. Banants, despite being leaders with 64% away wins, score only 1.36 goals away on average, have xG 1.16 and 3.27 shots on target per game. In the last 5 matches Banants scored 9 goals but conceded as many as 11, while Pyunik in the same period scored 4 and conceded 5, indicating greater defensive instability of the visitors. Pyunik concede only 0.67 goals per home match and keep 56% clean sheets, and the advantage in chance creation (a difference of 4.31 average shots and +0.50 in xG) gives the hosts a clear edge, hence the pick for a home win with a moderate risk of a draw.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Pyunik | Banants | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.39 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Pyunik is 43% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Pyunik · 1.4 pts / match - Banants
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Banants is 16% better for: goals scored per match.
1.37 goals / match - Pyunik · 1.59 goals / match - Banants
Pyunik is 43% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.67 goals / match - Pyunik · 0.96 goals / match - Banants
Pyunik scores in 78% of matches (21 of 27 matches), while Banants keeps a clean sheet in 48% (13 of 27 matches).
Banants scores in 78% of matches (21 of 27 matches), while Pyunik keeps a clean sheet in 52% (14 of 27 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Pyunik
Over / Under — Banants
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Pyunik - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 41% of matches and wins 63%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Banants - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 41% of matches and wins 52%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 100% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Pyunik
Banants
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Armenian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Pyunik | Liga | Banants | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.04 | 2.56 | • 2.56 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 37% | 44% | ▼ 41% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 37% | 46% | ▼ 41% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 52% | 33% | ▲ 48% |
| Goal before half-time | • 70% | 69% | ▼ 63% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 74% | 78% | • 78% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Pyunik 0 - 1 - 1 Banants. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Pyunik vs Banants?
The Armenian Premier League match finished Pyunik 2:1 Banants. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Pyunik and Banants?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Pyunik won 0, Banants won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Pyunik vs Banants?
Pyunik score 1.37 goals per game on average and Banants 1.59. The Armenian Premier League average is 2.56 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 37% of Pyunik's matches and 41% of Banants's.
What form are Pyunik and Banants in?
Over the last 5 games Pyunik have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Banants 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pyunik vs Banants?
The statistical background for Pyunik vs Banants — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


