Armenia - Armenian Premier LeagueData current as of September 03, 2026

Pyunik vs Banants: match statistics

Pyunik crest
Pyunik
2 : 1half-time 1:0
Banants crest
Banants

Pyunik vs Banants: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Pyunik played against Banants in Armenian Premier League (Armenia). The game was played on April 23, 2026. Final score: 2:1.

Recent form

Pyunik has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Banants has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Pyunik scores 1.45 goals per game and allows 0.75. Banants scores 1.86 and allows 0.81. Games in this league average 2.53 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 40% of Pyunik's games and 48% of Banants's. The Over 2.5 rates are 40% and 43%, compared with league averages of 46% for BTTS and 48% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Pyunik has the higher season xG average, 1.52 to 1.28 per game. Pyunik takes 13.1 shots per game, while Banants takes 10.4.

First-half and second-half trends

Pyunik leads at halftime in 40% of its games and scores 0.85 goals per game after halftime. Banants leads at halftime in 48% and scores 1.10 after halftime.

When the teams score

Pyunik's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). For Banants, it is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Armenian Premier League games average 2.53 goals. Both teams score in 46% of games, and 48% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

The match favorite is the home side: Pyunik win 78% of home games, score on average 1.89 goals, generate xG 1.66 and register 5.44 shots on target from 13.67 attempts per match. Banants, despite being leaders with 64% away wins, score only 1.36 goals away on average, have xG 1.16 and 3.27 shots on target per game. In the last 5 matches Banants scored 9 goals but conceded as many as 11, while Pyunik in the same period scored 4 and conceded 5, indicating greater defensive instability of the visitors. Pyunik concede only 0.67 goals per home match and keep 56% clean sheets, and the advantage in chance creation (a difference of 4.31 average shots and +0.50 in xG) gives the hosts a clear edge, hence the pick for a home win with a moderate risk of a draw.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Season-long stats show Pyunik at home average 2.4 goals scored and 1.1 conceded, while Banants away concede only 0.55 goals and have 55% clean sheets, favoring a no BTTS scenario. Pyunik have 50% BTTS at home overall, but in the last 5 home matches BTTS is only 20% and they average 0.8 goals, indicating reduced attacking form. Counterpoint: Banants have 80% BTTS in their last 5 matches and concede on average 2.2 goals, and xG indicates comparable attacking potential (xG 1.39 for Pyunik vs 1.16 for Banants, total 2.55 vs league average 2.52), so the risk of Goal/Goal exists. Weighing Banants’ season-long away resilience (0.55 conceded and 55% clean sheets) against Pyunik’s weaker recent finishing, I moderately lean to a No Goal outcome and propose a probability split of 38% 'yes' / 62% 'no'.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Pyunik scores an average of 2.4 goals at home, while Banants averages 1.36 away and concedes only 0.55 on the road, indicating a home attack edge. xG is 1.39 for Pyunik and 1.16 for Banants (total xG = 2.55), but Pyunik’s high finishing rate of 21% with 11.5 shots per game suggests actual expected goals may exceed raw xG. Based on these indicators I model expected goals of 1.65 for Pyunik and 1.25 for Banants (total 2.90), which translates to roughly an 85% probability of Over 1.5 goals and ~58% for Over 2.5 goals. Additionally, Pyunik has 60% of home matches Over 2.5, while Banants have 27% away, so the signal for Over 2.5 is moderate; Over 3.5 (home 60% vs away 9%) remains relatively unlikely (~33%). Therefore I recommend a bet on Over 1.5 as the strongest and most reliable signal, with the 2.5 line as valuable but more risky.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Pyunik led at half-time in 5 matches (50%) and score on average 1.0 goals by the break versus 0.55 for Banants, so the hosts have a clear advantage in the first half. Over 90 minutes Pyunik averages 2.4 goals, 11.5 shots (4.9 on target) with a 21% conversion rate, while Banants average 1.36 goals, 9.36 shots (3.27 on target) and a 15% conversion, indicating greater efficiency for the hosts. Banants however have a better season record (2.27 points per game and 64% wins versus Pyunik’s 1.7 pts and 50% wins) and perform strongly after the break (an average of 2.0 points in second halves and 55% wins in second halves), which increases their chance of a turnaround. Weighing these figures, the most reliable signal is Pyunik leading at the break and winning the match (1/1) — I assign this outcome a 28% probability; the second scenario is a half-time draw and a Banants win (X/2) at 18%.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
1 : 1
Second half

Game stats

43Possession (%)57
PyunikBanants
25Shots9
PyunikBanants
9Shots on target4
PyunikBanants
2.68xG1.16
PyunikBanants
8Corners2
PyunikBanants
67Dangerous attacks43
PyunikBanants
22Fouls15
PyunikBanants
1Cards2
PyunikBanants

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.45Goals scored / game1.86
PyunikBanants
0.75Goals allowed / game0.81
PyunikBanants
54%Average possession54%
PyunikBanants
4.7Shots on target / game4.05
PyunikBanants

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

13.05Shots per game10.38
PyunikBanants
4.7Shots on target4.05
PyunikBanants
11.1%Shot conversion17.9%
PyunikBanants
54%Possession54%
PyunikBanants
1.52xG for1.28
PyunikBanants
1.06xG against1.25
PyunikBanants

Shooting quality

Pyunik: BalancedBanants: Efficient finishing
PyunikBanants
Accuracy (shots on target)36%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.46

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Banants is 33% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / game - Pyunik · 2.4 pts / game - Banants

Pyunik
WWWLL
Season result split
65% W10% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-2-5
2.05 pts / game · goal difference +14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-0-2
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WWWWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.16Opponent xG: 1.11BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%
Banants
WWWWL
Season result split
57% W29% R14% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-6-3
2.00 pts / game · goal difference +22
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
7-4-0
Last 5 away
3-2-0
DWDWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.46Opponent xG: 1.25BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Banants is 28% better for: goals scored per game.

1.45 goals / game - Pyunik · 1.86 goals / game - Banants

Pyunik is 8% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.75 goals / game - Pyunik · 0.81 goals / game - Banants

Pyunik scoring profile: strong

Pyunik scores in 85% of games (17 of 20 meczów), while Banants keeps a clean sheet in 48% (10 of 21 meczów).

Banants scoring profile: strong

Banants scores in 86% of games (18 of 21 meczów), while Pyunik keeps a clean sheet in 50% (10 of 20 meczów).

29Goals scored (season)39
PyunikBanants
15Goals conceded (season)17
PyunikBanants
2.2Average goals per game2.67
PyunikBanants
3Goals scored (last 5)12
PyunikBanants
3Goals conceded (last 5)7
PyunikBanants

How often they score at least...

85%1 goal86%
PyunikBanants
40%2 goals48%
PyunikBanants
10%3 goals19%
PyunikBanants
5%4 goals19%
PyunikBanants

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal52%
PyunikBanants
20%2 goals19%
PyunikBanants
5%3 goals10%
PyunikBanants
0%4 goals0%
PyunikBanants

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time10%
PyunikBanants
0%BTTS in both halves5%
PyunikBanants
20%Scored in both halves29%
PyunikBanants

BTTS and goal count

35%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
PyunikBanants
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
PyunikBanants
0%BTTS - last 580%
PyunikBanants

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

70%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
PyunikBanants
15%Min. 2 goals before half-time24%
PyunikBanants
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
PyunikBanants

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
PyunikBanants
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time43%
PyunikBanants
10%Min. 3 goals after half-time19%
PyunikBanants

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Banants is 21% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / game - Pyunik · 1.81 pts / game - Banants

Pyunik - half-time state
40% leading30% draw30% trailing
Banants - half-time state
48% leading38% draw14% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per game (1st half)1.81
PyunikBanants
0.6Goals scored (1st half)0.76
PyunikBanants
0.3Goals conceded (1st half)0.29
PyunikBanants
0.9Average goals (1st half)1.05
PyunikBanants
70%Clean sheet before half-time76%
PyunikBanants
60%No goal before half-time48%
PyunikBanants

After half-time (2nd half)

1.7Points per game (2nd half)1.76
PyunikBanants
0.85Goals scored (2nd half)1.1
PyunikBanants
0.45Goals conceded (2nd half)0.52
PyunikBanants
1.3Average goals (2nd half)1.62
PyunikBanants
60%Clean sheet after half-time57%
PyunikBanants
35%No goal after half-time38%
PyunikBanants

Pyunik - second-half results

45% W35% R20% P
30
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding163%

Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 65%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Banants - second-half results

48% W33% R19% P
38
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+10
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
+12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.81
PPG before half-time
Lead holding119%

Leads at halftime in 48% of games and wins 57%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Pyunik - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.00
Goals scored / game0.40.2
Goals allowed / game0.20.4
Average goals per game0.60.6
1 goal60%60%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Banants - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.802.00
Goals scored / game1.01.4
Goals allowed / game0.41.0
Average goals per game1.42.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+3+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Pyunik
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
4
1
16-30
5
3
31-45
4
1
46-60
6
2
61-75
7
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Banants
ScoredConceded
8
4
0-15
2
1
16-30
6
1
31-45
7
3
46-60
5
3
61-75
11
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.44
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.1 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
44%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+3%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
73%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Pyunik

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.46
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.31
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
102%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
68%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.25
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Banants

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.58
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.44
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
169%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
57%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Armenian Premier League).

Teams vs league

PyunikLigaBanants
Average goals per game 2.202.53 2.67
Both teams scored 40%46% 48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 40%48% 43%
Clean sheets 50%32% 48%
Goal before half-time 70%71% 67%
Goal after half-time 80%79% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.53
Average goals per game
46%
Both teams scored
48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.42
Home goals / game
1.10
Away goals / game
+29%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defensive advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PyunikGoalMomo YansaneAssist: Eric Ocansey
  2. PyunikYellow cardSead Islamović
  3. BanantsYellow cardKaren Melkonyan
  4. BanantsSubstitutionOn: Artemi GunkoOff: Sergey Mkrtchyan
  5. PyunikSubstitutionOn: Aleksandar MiljkovićOff: Momo Yansane

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Artem GasparyanMatches officiated: 15
4Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 253%Home wins13%Draws33%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from Pyunik's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss against Banants. Games average 2.50 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

FC Banants
1 : 1
Pyunik FC
Pyunik FC
1 : 2
FC Banants

FAQ

What was the result of Pyunik vs Banants?

The Armenian Premier League match finished Pyunik 2:1 Banants. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Pyunik and Banants?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Pyunik won 0, Banants won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Pyunik vs Banants?

Pyunik score 1.45 goals per game on average and Banants 1.86. The Armenian Premier League average is 2.53 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Pyunik's matches and 48% of Banants's.

What form are Pyunik and Banants in?

Over the last 5 games Pyunik have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Banants 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pyunik vs Banants?

The statistical background for Pyunik vs Banants — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.