Qatar SC vs Al Gharafa: match statistics
The match promises to be highly competitive. Qatar SC displays solid home form with a 50% home win rate and a +1 goal difference, but Al Gharafa occupies a high 2nd place in the table and also wins half of their away fixtures. A key factor is the weaker recent form of both teams - Qatar SC has been picking up 1.6 PPG in their last 5 games, while Al Gharafa has only managed 1.2 PPG, suggesting a dip in performance. The xG stats are nearly identical for both sides (Qatar 1.48 vs Al Gharafa 1.35), as is their shot conversion (14% vs 13%). Al Gharafa holds an edge in ball possession (51% vs 46%), but finishing 50% of their away matches without scoring could be a major issue. Given the balanced statistics, Qatar's home advantage, and the unstable form of both teams, a draw appears to be the most likely outcome, although a win for either side is equally possible.
Qatar SC vs Al Gharafa: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Qatar SC played against Al Gharafa in Stars League (Qatar). The game was played on March 12, 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Recent form
Qatar SC has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Al Gharafa has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Qatar SC scores 1.69 goals per game and allows 1.63. Al Gharafa scores 1.71 and allows 1.35. Games in this league average 3.30 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 69% of Qatar SC's games and 59% of Al Gharafa's. The Over 2.5 rates are 56% and 65%, compared with league averages of 58% for BTTS and 63% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Al Gharafa has the higher season xG average, 1.53 to 1.42 per game. Qatar SC takes 12.5 shots per game, while Al Gharafa takes 13.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Qatar SC leads at halftime in 31% of its games and scores 1.19 goals per game after halftime. Al Gharafa leads at halftime in 24% and scores 1.24 after halftime.
When the teams score
Qatar SC's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). For Al Gharafa, it is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Stars League games average 3.30 goals. Both teams score in 58% of games, and 63% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
The match promises to be highly competitive. Qatar SC displays solid home form with a 50% home win rate and a +1 goal difference, but Al Gharafa occupies a high 2nd place in the table and also wins half of their away fixtures. A key factor is the weaker recent form of both teams - Qatar SC has been picking up 1.6 PPG in their last 5 games, while Al Gharafa has only managed 1.2 PPG, suggesting a dip in performance. The xG stats are nearly identical for both sides (Qatar 1.48 vs Al Gharafa 1.35), as is their shot conversion (14% vs 13%). Al Gharafa holds an edge in ball possession (51% vs 46%), but finishing 50% of their away matches without scoring could be a major issue. Given the balanced statistics, Qatar's home advantage, and the unstable form of both teams, a draw appears to be the most likely outcome, although a win for either side is equally possible.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Qatar SC | Al Gharafa | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.44 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Qatar SC is 17% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Qatar SC · 1.2 pts / game - Al Gharafa
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Al Gharafa is 21% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.63 goals / game - Qatar SC · 1.35 goals / game - Al Gharafa
Qatar SC scores in 88% of games (14 of 16 meczów), while Al Gharafa keeps a clean sheet in 18% (3 of 17 meczów).
Al Gharafa scores in 71% of games (12 of 17 meczów), while Qatar SC keeps a clean sheet in 19% (3 of 16 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Qatar SC
Over / Under - Al Gharafa
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Qatar SC is 22% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.44 pts / game - Qatar SC · 1.18 pts / game - Al Gharafa
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Qatar SC - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 31% of games and wins 44%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Al Gharafa - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 24% of games and wins 65%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 3.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 80% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 0% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 0% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Qatar SC
Al Gharafa
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Stars League).
Teams vs league
| Qatar SC | Liga | Al Gharafa | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 3.31 | 3.30 | ▼ 3.06 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 69% | 58% | • 59% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 56% | 63% | ▲ 65% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 19% | 24% | ▼ 18% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 70% | ▼ 65% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 86% | ▲ 88% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Qatar SC's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Al Gharafa. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Qatar SC vs Al Gharafa?
The Stars League match finished Qatar SC 2:0 Al Gharafa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Qatar SC vs Al Gharafa?
Qatar SC score 1.69 goals per game on average and Al Gharafa 1.71. The Stars League average is 3.30 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 69% of Qatar SC's matches and 59% of Al Gharafa's.
What form are Qatar SC and Al Gharafa in?
Over the last 5 games Qatar SC have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Al Gharafa 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Qatar SC vs Al Gharafa?
The statistical background for Qatar SC vs Al Gharafa — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.