Qingdao Jonoon vs Shanghai Shenhua: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
Qingdao Jonoon vs Shanghai Shenhua: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Qingdao Jonoon play Shanghai Shenhua in Chinese Super League (China). The match date is 8 August 2026. Venue: Qingdao Tiantai Stadium.
Current form
Qingdao Jonoon: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Shanghai Shenhua: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Qingdao Jonoon scores 1.43 and concedes 1.90 goals per match. Shanghai Shenhua scores 1.85 and concedes 1.70. League average: 3.07 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Qingdao Jonoon 67%, Shanghai Shenhua 70%. Over 2.5: Qingdao Jonoon 57%, Shanghai Shenhua 65%. League level: BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 58%.
xG, shots and style
Shanghai Shenhua has higher xG: 1.70 vs 1.36. Qingdao Jonoon: 12.4 shots per match, Shanghai Shenhua: 15.3.
Match halves
Qingdao Jonoon: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.90. Shanghai Shenhua: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.95.
Goals by minute
Qingdao Jonoon: 76-90+ (8 goals). Shanghai Shenhua: 61-75 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Chinese Super League: 3.07 goals per match, BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 58%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-3. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 33%.
Before the match
1X2 odds
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Qingdao Jonoon | Shanghai Shenhua | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Shanghai Shenhua is 500% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / match - Qingdao Jonoon · 1.2 pts / match - Shanghai Shenhua
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Shanghai Shenhua is 29% better for: goals scored per match.
1.43 goals / match - Qingdao Jonoon · 1.85 goals / match - Shanghai Shenhua
Shanghai Shenhua is 12% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.9 goals / match - Qingdao Jonoon · 1.7 goals / match - Shanghai Shenhua
Qingdao Jonoon scores in 71% of matches (15 of 21 matches), while Shanghai Shenhua keeps a clean sheet in 15% (3 of 20 matches).
Shanghai Shenhua scores in 85% of matches (17 of 20 matches), while Qingdao Jonoon keeps a clean sheet in 10% (2 of 21 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Qingdao Jonoon
Over / Under — Shanghai Shenhua
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Shanghai Shenhua is 26% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.19 pts / match - Qingdao Jonoon · 1.5 pts / match - Shanghai Shenhua
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Qingdao Jonoon - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Shanghai Shenhua - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.20 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 0% |
| No goal | 100% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Qingdao Jonoon
Shanghai Shenhua
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Chinese Super League).
Teams vs league
| Qingdao Jonoon | Liga | Shanghai Shenhua | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.33 | 3.07 | ▲ 3.55 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 64% | ▲ 70% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 57% | 58% | ▲ 65% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 10% | 20% | ▼ 15% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 71% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 90% | 88% | ▲ 90% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Qingdao Jonoon 0 - 0 - 3 Shanghai Shenhua. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 33% matches.
FAQ
When do Qingdao Jonoon and Shanghai Shenhua play?
Qingdao Jonoon face Shanghai Shenhua on 8 August 2026 in Chinese Super League at Qingdao Tiantai Stadium. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What is the head-to-head record between Qingdao Jonoon and Shanghai Shenhua?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Qingdao Jonoon won 0, Shanghai Shenhua won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Qingdao Jonoon vs Shanghai Shenhua?
Qingdao Jonoon score 1.43 goals per game on average and Shanghai Shenhua 1.85. The Chinese Super League average is 3.07 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Qingdao Jonoon's matches and 70% of Shanghai Shenhua's.
What form are Qingdao Jonoon and Shanghai Shenhua in?
Over the last 5 games Qingdao Jonoon have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Shanghai Shenhua 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Qingdao Jonoon vs Shanghai Shenhua?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.