China - Chinese Super LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Qingdao Jonoon vs Shanghai SIPG: match statistics

Qingdao Jonoon crest
Qingdao Jonoon
3 : 1half-time 1:0
Shanghai SIPG crest
Shanghai SIPG

Qingdao Jonoon vs Shanghai SIPG: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Qingdao Jonoon play Shanghai SIPG in Chinese Super League (China). The match date is 2 May 2026 at 13:00. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

Qingdao Jonoon: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Shanghai SIPG: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Qingdao Jonoon scores 1.58 and concedes 1.89 goals per match. Shanghai SIPG scores 1.56 and concedes 1.44. League average: 3.09 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Qingdao Jonoon 74%, Shanghai SIPG 78%. Over 2.5: Qingdao Jonoon 63%, Shanghai SIPG 67%. League level: BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 59%.

xG, shots and style

xG is very similar for both teams. Qingdao Jonoon: 12.2 shots per match, Shanghai SIPG: 10.9.

Match halves

Qingdao Jonoon: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 1.00. Shanghai SIPG: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Qingdao Jonoon: 76-90+ (8 goals). Shanghai SIPG: 46-60 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Chinese Super League: 3.09 goals per match, BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 59%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 0-0-2. Average goals 5.50, BTTS 100%.

Match description

I back a Qingdao Jonoon win: at home they average 1.5 goals per game and have a 50% home win rate. In home matches they average 11 shots and 3.5 shots on target with a conversion rate of 14%, while Shanghai away average 8.33 shots, 2 on target and have a conversion rate of just 4%. The visitors have not won away (0% wins), failed to score in 67% of away matches and average only 0.33 goals per away game. Qingdao keep a clean sheet in 50% of home games and concede 1.25 goals per match on average, and the hosts’ average xG is 1.21 versus 0.99 xG for Shanghai away, indicating a superiority in quality chances for the hosts. In the last 5 matches Qingdao are 2-2-1 (goals 6-4), while Shanghai are 2-1-2 (goals 8-5); however, the visitors’ poor away efficiency leads me to assign greater probability to the hosts. I give the hosts a 67% chance to win, 18% for a draw and 15% for an away win.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

36Possession (%)64
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG
11Shots11
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG
4Shots on target3
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG
1.15xG1.38
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG
1Corners5
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG
24Dangerous attacks64
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG
15Fouls16
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG
1Cards4
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG
1.58Goals scored / match1.56
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG
1.89Goals conceded / match1.44
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG
45%Average possession58%
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG
4.05Shots on target / match3.61
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.16Shots per match10.89
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG
4.05Shots on target3.61
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG
13%Shot conversion14.3%
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG
45%Possession58%
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG
1.33xG for1.33
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG
1.69xG against1.29
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG

Shooting quality

Qingdao Jonoon: Counter-attackingShanghai SIPG: Efficient finishing
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG
Accuracy (shots on target)33%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.390.43

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Shanghai SIPG is 25% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Qingdao Jonoon · 1 pts / match - Shanghai SIPG

Qingdao Jonoon
LWDLL
Season result split
32% W16% R53% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-3-10
1.11 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-2-2
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WWLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 1.45Opponent xG: 1.99BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%
Shanghai SIPG
DLWLD
Season result split
28% W33% R39% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-6-7
1.17 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-3-5
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WLWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.32Opponent xG: 1.17BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Shanghai SIPG is 31% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.89 goals / match - Qingdao Jonoon · 1.44 goals / match - Shanghai SIPG

Qingdao Jonoon scoring profile: very strong

Qingdao Jonoon scores in 79% of matches (15 of 19 matches), while Shanghai SIPG keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 18 matches).

Shanghai SIPG scoring profile: very strong

Shanghai SIPG scores in 89% of matches (16 of 18 matches), while Qingdao Jonoon keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 19 matches).

30Goals scored (season)28
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG
36Goals conceded (season)26
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG
3.47Average goals in match3
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG
10Goals scored (last 5)8
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG
14Goals conceded (last 5)9
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG

How often they score at least...

79%1 goal89%
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG
42%2 goals44%
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG
26%3 goals11%
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG
11%4 goals11%
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG

How often they concede at least...

89%1 goal89%
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG
47%2 goals44%
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG
32%3 goals11%
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG
16%4 goals0%
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

65%
League average

Goal patterns

5%BTTS at half-time22%
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG
0%BTTS in both halves11%
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG
21%Scored in both halves33%
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG

BTTS and goal count

63%Min. 3 goals and BTTS61%
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG
100%BTTS - last 5100%
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time61%
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG
32%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG
16%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG

2nd half

89%Min. 1 goal after half-time94%
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG
68%Min. 2 goals after half-time61%
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG
42%Min. 3 goals after half-time33%
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Shanghai SIPG is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.32 pts / match - Qingdao Jonoon · 1.39 pts / match - Shanghai SIPG

Qingdao Jonoon - half-time state
32% leading37% draw32% trailing
Shanghai SIPG - half-time state
28% leading56% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.32Points per match (1st half)1.39
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG
0.58Goals scored (1st half)0.56
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG
0.68Goals conceded (1st half)0.44
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG
1.26Average goals (1st half)1
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG
63%Clean sheet before half-time67%
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG
68%No goal before half-time50%
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG

After half-time (2nd half)

1.37Points per match (2nd half)1.11
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG
1Goals scored (2nd half)1
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG
1.21Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG
2.21Average goals (2nd half)2
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG
21%Clean sheet after half-time28%
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG
32%No goal after half-time28%
Qingdao JonoonShanghai SIPG

Qingdao Jonoon - second-half results

32% W42% R26% P
25
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.32
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Shanghai SIPG - second-half results

28% W28% R44% P
25
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.39
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Qingdao Jonoon - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.80
Goals scored / match0.81.2
Goals conceded / match1.21.6
Average goals in match2.02.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-2-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Shanghai SIPG - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match0.41.4
Average goals in match1.22.2
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+2-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Qingdao Jonoon
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
2
7
16-30
4
3
31-45
4
11
46-60
7
5
61-75
8
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Shanghai SIPG
ScoredConceded
1
5
0-15
3
2
16-30
6
1
31-45
7
6
46-60
4
6
61-75
7
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.24
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
76%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+70%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
70%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Qingdao Jonoon

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.36
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
145%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.31
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Shanghai SIPG

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
120%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Chinese Super League).

Teams vs league

Qingdao JonoonLigaShanghai SIPG
Average goals in match 3.473.09 3.00
Both teams scored 74%65% 78%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 63%59% 67%
Clean sheets 11%19% 11%
Goal before half-time 63%70% 61%
Goal after half-time 89%89% 94%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.09
Average goals per match
65%
Both teams scored
59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
19%
Clean sheets
1.80
Home goals / match
1.30
Away goals / match
+38%
Home attack advantage
+28%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
89%
1 goal
56%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Qingdao Jonoon 0 - 0 - 2 Shanghai SIPG. Average goals 5.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Qingdao Jonoon FC
3 : 4
Shanghai SIPG FC
Shanghai SIPG FC
3 : 1
Qingdao Jonoon FC

FAQ

What was the result of Qingdao Jonoon vs Shanghai SIPG?

The Chinese Super League match finished Qingdao Jonoon 3:1 Shanghai SIPG. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Qingdao Jonoon and Shanghai SIPG?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Qingdao Jonoon won 0, Shanghai SIPG won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 5.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Qingdao Jonoon vs Shanghai SIPG?

Qingdao Jonoon score 1.58 goals per game on average and Shanghai SIPG 1.56. The Chinese Super League average is 3.09 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 74% of Qingdao Jonoon's matches and 78% of Shanghai SIPG's.

What form are Qingdao Jonoon and Shanghai SIPG in?

Over the last 5 games Qingdao Jonoon have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Shanghai SIPG 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Qingdao Jonoon vs Shanghai SIPG?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.