Uzbekistan - Uzbekistan Super LeagueData current as of 16 July 2026

Qizilqum vs AGMK: match statistics

Qizilqum crest
Qizilqum
0 : 1half-time 0:1
AGMK crest
AGMK
165%(0.00)
X25%(0.00)
210%(0.00)

Qizilqum is displaying impressive home form with a 100% win rate in their home matches, scoring an average of 2 goals per game while conceding just 1. AGMK, on the other hand, has not won any away match this season (0% Win%), failing to score on the road (0 goals on average). The difference in offensive efficiency is drastic – the hosts have a 25% shot conversion rate in home games, while the visitors have not registered any points away. The recent form over the last five matches also favors the home side (1.4 PPG vs 1.0 PPG), and Qizilqum's last home outing ended in victory. xG statistics show a slight advantage for the hosts (1.01 vs 1.03), but the real scoring efficiency and goal difference clearly indicate a decisive advantage for Qizilqum in this encounter.

Qizilqum vs AGMK: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Qizilqum play AGMK in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The match date is 18 March 2026 at 16:00. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Qizilqum: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. AGMK: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Qizilqum scores 0.73 and concedes 1.36 goals per match. AGMK scores 1.27 and concedes 1.27. League average: 2.53 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Qizilqum 27%, AGMK 64%. Over 2.5: Qizilqum 36%, AGMK 55%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 51%.

xG, shots and style

AGMK has higher xG: 1.39 vs 1.18. Qizilqum: 9.9 shots per match, AGMK: 11.6.

Match halves

Qizilqum: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.36. AGMK: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.73.

Goals by minute

Qizilqum: 31-45+ (3 goals). AGMK: 0-15 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uzbekistan Super League: 2.53 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 51%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 0-1-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.

Match description

Qizilqum is displaying impressive home form with a 100% win rate in their home matches, scoring an average of 2 goals per game while conceding just 1. AGMK, on the other hand, has not won any away match this season (0% Win%), failing to score on the road (0 goals on average). The difference in offensive efficiency is drastic – the hosts have a 25% shot conversion rate in home games, while the visitors have not registered any points away. The recent form over the last five matches also favors the home side (1.4 PPG vs 1.0 PPG), and Qizilqum's last home outing ended in victory. xG statistics show a slight advantage for the hosts (1.01 vs 1.03), but the real scoring efficiency and goal difference clearly indicate a decisive advantage for Qizilqum in this encounter.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

51Possession (%)49
QizilqumAGMK
15Shots7
QizilqumAGMK
1Shots on target2
QizilqumAGMK
1.3xG0.86
QizilqumAGMK
4Corners4
QizilqumAGMK
39Dangerous attacks38
QizilqumAGMK
17Fouls15
QizilqumAGMK
4Cards0
QizilqumAGMK

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.73Goals scored / match1.27
QizilqumAGMK
1.36Goals conceded / match1.27
QizilqumAGMK
41%Average possession49%
QizilqumAGMK
2.64Shots on target / match3.45
QizilqumAGMK

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.91Shots per match11.55
QizilqumAGMK
2.64Shots on target3.45
QizilqumAGMK
7.3%Shot conversion11%
QizilqumAGMK
41%Possession49%
QizilqumAGMK
1.18xG for1.39
QizilqumAGMK
1.34xG against1.51
QizilqumAGMK

Shooting quality

Qizilqum: BalancedAGMK: Balanced
QizilqumAGMK
Accuracy (shots on target)27%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

AGMK is 57% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Qizilqum · 2.2 pts / match - AGMK

Qizilqum
LWWDL
Season result split
36% W9% R55% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-1-6
1.18 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-3
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LLLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.19Opponent xG: 1.22BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
AGMK
WWDWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
36% W36% R27% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-4-3
1.45 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-2
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LWLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.45Opponent xG: 1.71BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

AGMK is 74% better for: goals scored per match.

0.73 goals / match - Qizilqum · 1.27 goals / match - AGMK

AGMK is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.36 goals / match - Qizilqum · 1.27 goals / match - AGMK

Qizilqum scoring profile: strong

Qizilqum scores in 45% of matches (5 of 11 matches), while AGMK keeps a clean sheet in 18% (2 of 11 matches).

AGMK scoring profile: very strong

AGMK scores in 73% of matches (8 of 11 matches), while Qizilqum keeps a clean sheet in 27% (3 of 11 matches).

8Goals scored (season)14
QizilqumAGMK
15Goals conceded (season)14
QizilqumAGMK
2.09Average goals in match2.55
QizilqumAGMK
4Goals scored (last 5)9
QizilqumAGMK
5Goals conceded (last 5)6
QizilqumAGMK

How often they score at least...

45%1 goal73%
QizilqumAGMK
27%2 goals45%
QizilqumAGMK
0%3 goals9%
QizilqumAGMK
0%4 goals0%
QizilqumAGMK

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal82%
QizilqumAGMK
36%2 goals36%
QizilqumAGMK
18%3 goals9%
QizilqumAGMK
9%4 goals0%
QizilqumAGMK

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

9%BTTS at half-time9%
QizilqumAGMK
0%BTTS in both halves0%
QizilqumAGMK
18%Scored in both halves9%
QizilqumAGMK

BTTS and goal count

27%Min. 3 goals and BTTS55%
QizilqumAGMK
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
QizilqumAGMK
40%BTTS - last 580%
QizilqumAGMK

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time64%
QizilqumAGMK
27%Min. 2 goals before half-time36%
QizilqumAGMK
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
QizilqumAGMK

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
QizilqumAGMK
36%Min. 2 goals after half-time36%
QizilqumAGMK
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
QizilqumAGMK

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

AGMK is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.18 pts / match - Qizilqum · 1.27 pts / match - AGMK

Qizilqum - half-time state
27% leading36% draw36% trailing
AGMK - half-time state
27% leading45% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.18Points per match (1st half)1.27
QizilqumAGMK
0.36Goals scored (1st half)0.55
QizilqumAGMK
0.64Goals conceded (1st half)0.64
QizilqumAGMK
1Average goals (1st half)1.18
QizilqumAGMK
55%Clean sheet before half-time64%
QizilqumAGMK
73%No goal before half-time64%
QizilqumAGMK

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1.36
QizilqumAGMK
0.36Goals scored (2nd half)0.73
QizilqumAGMK
0.73Goals conceded (2nd half)0.64
QizilqumAGMK
1.09Average goals (2nd half)1.36
QizilqumAGMK
45%Clean sheet after half-time36%
QizilqumAGMK
64%No goal after half-time55%
QizilqumAGMK

Qizilqum - second-half results

18% W45% R36% P
13
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.18
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

AGMK - second-half results

36% W27% R36% P
14
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.27
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Qizilqum - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.20
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.00.8
1 goal40%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
AGMK - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.202.00
Goals scored / match0.81.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.61.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Qizilqum
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
1
3
16-30
3
3
31-45
0
3
46-60
1
3
61-75
3
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

AGMK
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
1
2
16-30
2
4
31-45
3
2
46-60
2
2
61-75
3
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.31
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
46%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-14%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
33%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
15%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Qizilqum

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.16
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.47
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+5.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.45
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
54%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
114%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.22
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

AGMK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
107%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
95%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.75
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).

Teams vs league

QizilqumLigaAGMK
Average goals in match 2.092.53 2.55
Both teams scored 27%52% 64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 36%51% 55%
Clean sheets 27%27% 18%
Goal before half-time 64%67% 64%
Goal after half-time 73%77% 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.53
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.34
Home goals / match
1.19
Away goals / match
+13%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Qizilqum 0 - 1 - 1 AGMK. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

FK AGMK
0 : 0
Qizilqum Zarafshon PFK
Qizilqum Zarafshon PFK
1 : 3
FK AGMK

FAQ

What was the result of Qizilqum vs AGMK?

The Uzbekistan Super League match finished Qizilqum 0:1 AGMK. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Qizilqum and AGMK?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Qizilqum won 0, AGMK won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Qizilqum vs AGMK?

Qizilqum score 0.73 goals per game on average and AGMK 1.27. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.53 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 27% of Qizilqum's matches and 64% of AGMK's.

What form are Qizilqum and AGMK in?

Over the last 5 games Qizilqum have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and AGMK 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Qizilqum vs AGMK?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.