Uzbekistan - Uzbekistan Super LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Qizilqum vs Andijan: match statistics

Qizilqum crest
Qizilqum
2 : 1half-time 1:0
Andijan crest
Andijan
120%(0.00)
X25%(0.00)
255%(0.00)

Andijan displays significantly better form than Qizilqum, evidenced by their league standing—the league leaders versus the 13th-placed side. The visitors have netted 10 goals while conceding 6 in their last five matches, averaging 2 PPG, whereas the hosts are averaging just 0.8 PPG with a goal difference of 6:13. Andijan won their sole match of the season 4-0 with a clean sheet, demonstrating defensive solidity and offensive efficiency. Conversely, Qizilqum is yet to win a home match this season, further diminishing their prospects. Considering all statistical metrics, Andijan is the clear favorite for this fixture, although a surprise result or a draw cannot be entirely ruled out.

Qizilqum vs Andijan: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Qizilqum play Andijan in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The match date is 4 March 2026 at 15:15. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Qizilqum: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Andijan: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Qizilqum scores 0.75 and concedes 1.42 goals per match. Andijan scores 1.54 and concedes 1.23. League average: 2.64 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Qizilqum 33%, Andijan 46%. Over 2.5: Qizilqum 42%, Andijan 69%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 53%.

xG, shots and style

Andijan has higher xG: 1.46 vs 1.20. Qizilqum: 9.9 shots per match, Andijan: 11.4.

Match halves

Qizilqum: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.42. Andijan: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 1.08.

Goals by minute

Qizilqum: 31-45+ (3 goals). Andijan: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uzbekistan Super League: 2.64 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 53%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 1-1-0. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Andijan displays significantly better form than Qizilqum, evidenced by their league standing—the league leaders versus the 13th-placed side. The visitors have netted 10 goals while conceding 6 in their last five matches, averaging 2 PPG, whereas the hosts are averaging just 0.8 PPG with a goal difference of 6:13. Andijan won their sole match of the season 4-0 with a clean sheet, demonstrating defensive solidity and offensive efficiency. Conversely, Qizilqum is yet to win a home match this season, further diminishing their prospects. Considering all statistical metrics, Andijan is the clear favorite for this fixture, although a surprise result or a draw cannot be entirely ruled out.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

47Possession (%)53
QizilqumAndijan
8Shots11
QizilqumAndijan
2Shots on target2
QizilqumAndijan
1.01xG1.27
QizilqumAndijan
3Corners2
QizilqumAndijan
48Dangerous attacks58
QizilqumAndijan
17Fouls16
QizilqumAndijan
4Cards2
QizilqumAndijan

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.75Goals scored / match1.54
QizilqumAndijan
1.42Goals conceded / match1.23
QizilqumAndijan
42%Average possession49%
QizilqumAndijan
2.67Shots on target / match4.15
QizilqumAndijan

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.92Shots per match11.38
QizilqumAndijan
2.67Shots on target4.15
QizilqumAndijan
7.6%Shot conversion13.5%
QizilqumAndijan
42%Possession49%
QizilqumAndijan
1.2xG for1.46
QizilqumAndijan
1.36xG against1.2
QizilqumAndijan

Shooting quality

Qizilqum: BalancedAndijan: Efficient finishing
QizilqumAndijan
Accuracy (shots on target)27%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Andijan is 43% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Qizilqum · 2 pts / match - Andijan

Qizilqum
WWDLL
Season result split
33% W8% R58% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-1-7
1.08 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-4
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LLWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.19Opponent xG: 1.23BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Andijan
WWWLD
Season result split
38% W15% R46% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-2-6
1.31 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-3
Last 5 away
2-2-1
LDWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.51Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Andijan is 105% better for: goals scored per match.

0.75 goals / match - Qizilqum · 1.54 goals / match - Andijan

Andijan is 15% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.42 goals / match - Qizilqum · 1.23 goals / match - Andijan

Qizilqum scoring profile: mixed

Qizilqum scores in 50% of matches (6 of 12 matches), while Andijan keeps a clean sheet in 31% (4 of 13 matches).

Andijan scoring profile: strong

Andijan scores in 69% of matches (9 of 13 matches), while Qizilqum keeps a clean sheet in 25% (3 of 12 matches).

9Goals scored (season)20
QizilqumAndijan
17Goals conceded (season)16
QizilqumAndijan
2.17Average goals in match2.77
QizilqumAndijan
4Goals scored (last 5)12
QizilqumAndijan
4Goals conceded (last 5)7
QizilqumAndijan

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal69%
QizilqumAndijan
25%2 goals46%
QizilqumAndijan
0%3 goals31%
QizilqumAndijan
0%4 goals8%
QizilqumAndijan

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal69%
QizilqumAndijan
42%2 goals38%
QizilqumAndijan
17%3 goals15%
QizilqumAndijan
8%4 goals0%
QizilqumAndijan

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

8%BTTS at half-time0%
QizilqumAndijan
0%BTTS in both halves0%
QizilqumAndijan
17%Scored in both halves31%
QizilqumAndijan

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS46%
QizilqumAndijan
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS23%
QizilqumAndijan
40%BTTS - last 580%
QizilqumAndijan

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time62%
QizilqumAndijan
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time23%
QizilqumAndijan
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
QizilqumAndijan

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time92%
QizilqumAndijan
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time54%
QizilqumAndijan
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time31%
QizilqumAndijan

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Andijan is 21% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.08 pts / match - Qizilqum · 1.31 pts / match - Andijan

Qizilqum - half-time state
25% leading33% draw42% trailing
Andijan - half-time state
31% leading38% draw31% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.08Points per match (1st half)1.31
QizilqumAndijan
0.33Goals scored (1st half)0.46
QizilqumAndijan
0.75Goals conceded (1st half)0.38
QizilqumAndijan
1.08Average goals (1st half)0.85
QizilqumAndijan
50%Clean sheet before half-time69%
QizilqumAndijan
75%No goal before half-time69%
QizilqumAndijan

After half-time (2nd half)

1.17Points per match (2nd half)1.77
QizilqumAndijan
0.42Goals scored (2nd half)1.08
QizilqumAndijan
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)0.85
QizilqumAndijan
1.08Average goals (2nd half)1.92
QizilqumAndijan
50%Clean sheet after half-time38%
QizilqumAndijan
58%No goal after half-time31%
QizilqumAndijan

Qizilqum - second-half results

25% W42% R33% P
13
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.08
PPG before half-time
Lead holding132%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Andijan - second-half results

54% W15% R31% P
17
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.31
PPG before half-time
Lead holding123%

Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Qizilqum - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.60
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match1.00.6
1 goal40%60%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Andijan - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.40
Goals scored / match0.61.8
Goals conceded / match0.21.2
Average goals in match0.83.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%80%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal60%0%
Goal difference+2+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Qizilqum
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
1
5
16-30
3
3
31-45
1
3
46-60
1
3
61-75
3
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Andijan
ScoredConceded
3
0
0-15
2
1
16-30
1
4
31-45
1
4
46-60
5
1
61-75
8
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.47
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
40%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+1%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
35%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
16%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Qizilqum

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.16
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.51
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+5.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.45
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
56%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
111%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.32
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Andijan

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
120%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
91%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.69
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
40% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
40%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).

Teams vs league

QizilqumLigaAndijan
Average goals in match 2.172.64 2.77
Both teams scored 33%56% 46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 42%53% 69%
Clean sheets 25%25% 31%
Goal before half-time 67%69% 62%
Goal after half-time 75%78% 92%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.64
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.35
Home goals / match
1.28
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+5%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Qizilqum 1 - 1 - 0 Andijan. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Qizilqum Zarafshon PFK
2 : 1
FK Andijan
FK Andijan
1 : 1
Qizilqum Zarafshon PFK

FAQ

What was the result of Qizilqum vs Andijan?

The Uzbekistan Super League match finished Qizilqum 2:1 Andijan. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Qizilqum and Andijan?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Qizilqum won 1, Andijan won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Qizilqum vs Andijan?

Qizilqum score 0.75 goals per game on average and Andijan 1.54. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.64 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Qizilqum's matches and 46% of Andijan's.

What form are Qizilqum and Andijan in?

Over the last 5 games Qizilqum have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Andijan 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Qizilqum vs Andijan?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Qizilqum vs Andijan: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.