Uzbekistan - Uzbekistan Super LeagueData current as of 16 July 2026

Qizilqum vs Kokand-1912: match statistics

Qizilqum crest
Qizilqum
2 : 1half-time 2:1
Kokand-1912 crest
Kokand-1912

Qizilqum vs Kokand-1912: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Qizilqum play Kokand-1912 in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The match date is 24 April 2026 at 16:00. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Qizilqum: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Kokand-1912: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Qizilqum scores 0.73 and concedes 1.36 goals per match. Kokand-1912 scores 0.91 and concedes 1.36. League average: 2.53 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Qizilqum 27%, Kokand-1912 55%. Over 2.5: Qizilqum 36%, Kokand-1912 55%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 51%.

xG, shots and style

Qizilqum has higher xG: 1.18 vs 1.17. Qizilqum: 9.9 shots per match, Kokand-1912: 9.7.

Match halves

Qizilqum: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.36. Kokand-1912: half-time lead 9%, second-half goals 0.55.

Goals by minute

Qizilqum: 31-45+ (3 goals). Kokand-1912: 76-90+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uzbekistan Super League: 2.53 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 51%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 1-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.

Match description

I predict a draw because in their last 5 matches Kokand-1912 have a record of 1 win and 4 draws (1-4-0), averaging 1.4 points per game, while Qizilqum in their last 5 have 1 win and 4 losses (1-0-4) with only 0.6 points per game. Qizilqum at home average just 0.75 goals scored and concede 2.25 goals per match, with home xG 1.19 versus opponents’ xG 1.44, indicating lower quality of chance creation and weak defense. Kokand-1912 produce superior away metrics: average possession 61% versus 48%, on average 4.25 shots on target compared to the home side’s 2, and higher xG for 1.38 versus Qizilqum’s 1.19. The difference in form over the last 5 is pronounced — Qizilqum have scored 2 and conceded 10, while Kokand have scored 7 and conceded 6, showing the visitors’ advantage in creating chances and maintaining results. Additionally, Kokand register as many as 75% draws in away games, while Qizilqum lose 75% of their home matches and have no clean sheets at home (0%), therefore the most likely scenario is a draw, with a higher probability of a draw than a home win.

Half-by-half

2 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

37Possession (%)63
QizilqumKokand-1912
8Shots10
QizilqumKokand-1912
5Shots on target3
QizilqumKokand-1912
1.2xG1.17
QizilqumKokand-1912
2Corners2
QizilqumKokand-1912
47Dangerous attacks45
QizilqumKokand-1912
16Fouls8
QizilqumKokand-1912
3Cards2
QizilqumKokand-1912

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.73Goals scored / match0.91
QizilqumKokand-1912
1.36Goals conceded / match1.36
QizilqumKokand-1912
41%Average possession52%
QizilqumKokand-1912
2.64Shots on target / match3.27
QizilqumKokand-1912

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.91Shots per match9.73
QizilqumKokand-1912
2.64Shots on target3.27
QizilqumKokand-1912
7.3%Shot conversion9.3%
QizilqumKokand-1912
41%Possession52%
QizilqumKokand-1912
1.18xG for1.17
QizilqumKokand-1912
1.34xG against1.41
QizilqumKokand-1912

Shooting quality

Qizilqum: BalancedKokand-1912: Balanced
QizilqumKokand-1912
Accuracy (shots on target)27%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Qizilqum is 40% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Qizilqum · 1 pts / match - Kokand-1912

Qizilqum
LWWDL
Season result split
36% W9% R55% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-1-6
1.18 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-3
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LLLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.19Opponent xG: 1.22BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Kokand-1912
DDLLW
Season result split
18% W45% R36% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-5-4
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-3-3
Last 5 away
0-3-2
DDDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.08Opponent xG: 1.61BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kokand-1912 is 25% better for: goals scored per match.

0.73 goals / match - Qizilqum · 0.91 goals / match - Kokand-1912

Qizilqum scoring profile: mixed

Qizilqum scores in 45% of matches (5 of 11 matches), while Kokand-1912 keeps a clean sheet in 27% (3 of 11 matches).

Kokand-1912 scoring profile: strong

Kokand-1912 scores in 64% of matches (7 of 11 matches), while Qizilqum keeps a clean sheet in 27% (3 of 11 matches).

8Goals scored (season)10
QizilqumKokand-1912
15Goals conceded (season)15
QizilqumKokand-1912
2.09Average goals in match2.27
QizilqumKokand-1912
4Goals scored (last 5)4
QizilqumKokand-1912
5Goals conceded (last 5)8
QizilqumKokand-1912

How often they score at least...

45%1 goal64%
QizilqumKokand-1912
27%2 goals27%
QizilqumKokand-1912
0%3 goals0%
QizilqumKokand-1912
0%4 goals0%
QizilqumKokand-1912

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal73%
QizilqumKokand-1912
36%2 goals45%
QizilqumKokand-1912
18%3 goals9%
QizilqumKokand-1912
9%4 goals9%
QizilqumKokand-1912

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

52%
League average

Goal patterns

9%BTTS at half-time27%
QizilqumKokand-1912
0%BTTS in both halves9%
QizilqumKokand-1912
18%Scored in both halves18%
QizilqumKokand-1912

BTTS and goal count

27%Min. 3 goals and BTTS45%
QizilqumKokand-1912
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
QizilqumKokand-1912
40%BTTS - last 540%
QizilqumKokand-1912

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time64%
QizilqumKokand-1912
27%Min. 2 goals before half-time45%
QizilqumKokand-1912
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
QizilqumKokand-1912

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time55%
QizilqumKokand-1912
36%Min. 2 goals after half-time45%
QizilqumKokand-1912
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time9%
QizilqumKokand-1912

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Qizilqum is 44% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.18 pts / match - Qizilqum · 0.82 pts / match - Kokand-1912

Qizilqum - half-time state
27% leading36% draw36% trailing
Kokand-1912 - half-time state
9% leading55% draw36% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.18Points per match (1st half)0.82
QizilqumKokand-1912
0.36Goals scored (1st half)0.36
QizilqumKokand-1912
0.64Goals conceded (1st half)0.82
QizilqumKokand-1912
1Average goals (1st half)1.18
QizilqumKokand-1912
55%Clean sheet before half-time45%
QizilqumKokand-1912
73%No goal before half-time64%
QizilqumKokand-1912

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1.18
QizilqumKokand-1912
0.36Goals scored (2nd half)0.55
QizilqumKokand-1912
0.73Goals conceded (2nd half)0.55
QizilqumKokand-1912
1.09Average goals (2nd half)1.09
QizilqumKokand-1912
45%Clean sheet after half-time64%
QizilqumKokand-1912
64%No goal after half-time55%
QizilqumKokand-1912

Qizilqum - second-half results

18% W45% R36% P
13
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.18
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kokand-1912 - second-half results

18% W64% R18% P
9
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.82
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 9% of matches and wins 18%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Qizilqum - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.20
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.00.8
1 goal40%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Kokand-1912 - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.80
Goals scored / match0.60.2
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match1.60.8
1 goal80%40%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference-2-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Qizilqum
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
1
3
16-30
3
3
31-45
0
3
46-60
1
3
61-75
3
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Kokand-1912
ScoredConceded
1
6
0-15
2
1
16-30
1
2
31-45
2
6
46-60
0
0
61-75
4
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.18
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
86%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
41%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-8%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
29%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
20%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Qizilqum

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.16
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.47
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+5.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.45
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
54%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
114%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.22
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

Kokand-1912

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
76%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
101%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
40% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
40%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).

Teams vs league

QizilqumLigaKokand-1912
Average goals in match 2.092.53 2.27
Both teams scored 27%52% 55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 36%51% 55%
Clean sheets 27%27% 27%
Goal before half-time 64%67% 64%
Goal after half-time 73%77% 55%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.53
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.34
Home goals / match
1.19
Away goals / match
+13%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Qizilqum 1 - 0 - 1 Kokand-1912. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

FK Qo'qon 1912
2 : 1
Qizilqum Zarafshon PFK
Qizilqum Zarafshon PFK
1 : 0
FK Qo'qon 1912

FAQ

What was the result of Qizilqum vs Kokand-1912?

The Uzbekistan Super League match finished Qizilqum 2:1 Kokand-1912. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Qizilqum and Kokand-1912?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Qizilqum won 1, Kokand-1912 won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Qizilqum vs Kokand-1912?

Qizilqum score 0.73 goals per game on average and Kokand-1912 0.91. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.53 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 27% of Qizilqum's matches and 55% of Kokand-1912's.

What form are Qizilqum and Kokand-1912 in?

Over the last 5 games Qizilqum have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Kokand-1912 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Qizilqum vs Kokand-1912?

The statistical background for Qizilqum vs Kokand-1912 — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.