Qizilqum vs Shortan: match statistics
Qizilqum vs Shortan: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Qizilqum played against Shortan in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The game was played on November 29, 2025. Final score: 3:3.
Recent form
Qizilqum has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Shortan has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Qizilqum scores 0.86 goals per game and allows 1.41. Shortan scores 0.83 and allows 1.86. Games in this league average 2.53 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 38% of Qizilqum's games and 52% of Shortan's. The Over 2.5 rates are 45% and 45%, compared with league averages of 46% for BTTS and 47% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Shortan has the higher season xG average, 1.28 to 1.23 per game. Qizilqum takes 10.8 shots per game, while Shortan takes 11.1.
First-half and second-half trends
Qizilqum leads at halftime in 21% of its games and scores 0.45 goals per game after halftime. Shortan leads at halftime in 7% and scores 0.45 after halftime.
When the teams score
Qizilqum's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (6 goals). For Shortan, it is minutes 31-45+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Uzbekistan Super League games average 2.53 goals. Both teams score in 46% of games, and 47% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Qizilqum | Shortan | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.24 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Qizilqum is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - Qizilqum · 0.8 pts / game - Shortan
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Qizilqum is 32% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.41 goals / game - Qizilqum · 1.86 goals / game - Shortan
Qizilqum scores in 59% of games (17 of 29 meczów), while Shortan keeps a clean sheet in 14% (4 of 29 meczów).
Shortan scores in 55% of games (16 of 29 meczów), while Qizilqum keeps a clean sheet in 34% (10 of 29 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Qizilqum
Over / Under - Shortan
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Qizilqum is 59% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.1 pts / game - Qizilqum · 0.69 pts / game - Shortan
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Qizilqum - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 31%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Shortan - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 7% of games and wins 10%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 0% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -12 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Qizilqum
Shortan
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).
Teams vs league
| Qizilqum | Liga | Shortan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.28 | 2.53 | ▲ 2.69 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 38% | 46% | ▲ 52% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 45% | 47% | ▼ 45% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 34% | 32% | ▼ 14% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 66% | 68% | • 69% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 76% | 73% | ▲ 76% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Record from Qizilqum's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Shortan. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Qizilqum vs Shortan?
The Uzbekistan Super League match finished Qizilqum 3:3 Shortan. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Qizilqum vs Shortan?
Qizilqum score 0.86 goals per game on average and Shortan 0.83. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.53 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Qizilqum's matches and 52% of Shortan's.
What form are Qizilqum and Shortan in?
Over the last 5 games Qizilqum have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Shortan 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Qizilqum vs Shortan?
The statistical background for Qizilqum vs Shortan — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.