Qizilqum vs Sogdiana: match statistics
Qizilqum vs Sogdiana: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Qizilqum played against Sogdiana in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The game was played on April 13, 2026. Final score: 1:3.
Recent form
Qizilqum has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Sogdiana has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses, with 0.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Qizilqum scores 0.67 goals per game and allows 1.67. Sogdiana scores 1.17 and allows 2.67. Games in this league average 2.42 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 17% of Qizilqum's games and 67% of Sogdiana's. The Over 2.5 rates are 33% and 83%, compared with league averages of 49% for BTTS and 47% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Sogdiana has the higher season xG average, 1.27 to 1.16 per game. Qizilqum takes 10.8 shots per game, while Sogdiana takes 10.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Qizilqum leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.33 goals per game after halftime. Sogdiana leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.50 after halftime.
When the teams score
Qizilqum's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (2 goals). For Sogdiana, it is minutes 0-15 (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Uzbekistan Super League games average 2.42 goals. Both teams score in 49% of games, and 47% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Qizilqum have the edge due to better recent form and results: over the last five matches they averaged 1.2 points per game and have 2 wins this season, while Sogdiana average only 0.4 points per game in their last 5 and have yet to win away (0 wins). The home defense looks slightly more solid — Qizilqum concede 2.00 goals per game at home, whereas Sogdiana concede 2.67 goals away; the goal difference in home matches is -4 versus -5 for the visitors. Sogdiana’s attack is more efficient in terms of shot quality: the visitors average 3.0 shots on target per game and have an 11% conversion rate, while the hosts have 1.67 shots on target and a 6% conversion, and the xG for both teams is nearly identical (1.09 vs 1.08). However, the hosts have a high percentage of home matches without scoring — 67% — which can limit their effectiveness; meanwhile Sogdiana have no clean sheets (0%) and conceded 12 goals in the last five matches. Considering the hosts’ better points figures (1.2 vs 0.4), lower average goals conceded at home and the visitors’ lack of away wins, I project a Qizilqum victory, albeit by a modest margin and with a low total goal count.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I forecast BTTS - Yes at 70% probability because both teams have a seasonal BTTS rate of 67%. Neither Qizilqum nor Sogdiana has a clean sheet this season (0%) and both concede an average of 2.67 goals per match, which substantially increases the likelihood of both teams scoring. Offensively Qizilqum posts xG 1.46 and averages 1.33 goals with 5.33 shots on target, while Sogdiana has xG 1.08 and 1.0 goal with 3.0 shots on target, so both generate genuine scoring opportunities. Short-term signals are mixed — in the last 5 matches Qizilqum recorded only 20% BTTS and 0.8 goals on average, whereas Sogdiana has 80% BTTS and 1.4 goals on average — this reduces confidence but does not negate the seasonal trends. Given both teams’ 67% seasonal BTTS, Sogdiana’s 100% of matches over 2.5 goals and the absence of clean sheets, I recommend Yes (70%) over No (30%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The modeled xG (average of attack and opponent defense) yields expected goals of 1.48 for Qizilqum and 1.30 for Sogdiana, totaling 2.78 goals. Applying a Poisson distribution to a 2.78 mean gives roughly a 76.5% probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5) and about a 52.6% probability of at least 3 goals (Over 2.5), while the chance of 4+ goals is around 30.3%. Seasonal stats reinforce the Over signal: both teams have 100% of matches with over 1.5 goals this season, Qizilqum has 67% of matches over 2.5 and Sogdiana 100% over 2.5, with BTTS at 67% for both. Additionally, hosts register 5.33 shots on target versus 3.0 for the visitors, and both teams concede an average of 2.67 goals per match, increasing the likelihood of further scoring. Considering the xG 1.48/1.30 and the dominant seasonal over1.5/over2.5 metrics, the strongest signal is Over 1.5, hence the recommendation to back the Over at the 1.5 line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is 1/1: the home side have higher xG (1.46 vs 1.08) and on average more shots on target (5.33 vs 3.00), which translates into more chances and greater probability of taking a lead at the break and securing the win. At half-time the hosts average 1.00 goal versus 0.33 for the visitors, and historically they led at the break in 33% of matches (1 of 3), confirming a trend of the home side opening the scoring. The visitors are in poorer form – winless in their last 5 matches (last 5: 'ldldl') and conceding an average of 2.4 goals in that period, while they concede 2.67 goals per game across the season, which hampers the possibility of a turnaround. Although both teams scored in 67% of matches, the higher xG and greater number of shots on target for the home team make the most reliable signal a Half-Time/Full-Time prediction of the home side leading at the break and winning by full-time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Qizilqum | Sogdiana | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 20% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Qizilqum is 200% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - Qizilqum · 0.4 pts / game - Sogdiana
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sogdiana is 75% better for: goals scored per game.
0.67 goals / game - Qizilqum · 1.17 goals / game - Sogdiana
Qizilqum is 60% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.67 goals / game - Qizilqum · 2.67 goals / game - Sogdiana
Qizilqum scores in 33% of games (2 of 6 meczów), while Sogdiana keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 6 meczów).
Sogdiana scores in 67% of games (4 of 6 meczów), while Qizilqum keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Qizilqum
Over / Under - Sogdiana
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Sogdiana is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.17 pts / game - Qizilqum · 1.33 pts / game - Sogdiana
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Qizilqum - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Sogdiana - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 0%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 1.0 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -6 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Qizilqum
Sogdiana
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).
Teams vs league
| Qizilqum | Liga | Sogdiana | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.33 | 2.42 | ▲ 3.83 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 17% | 49% | ▲ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 33% | 47% | ▲ 83% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 27% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 68% | ▲ 83% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 83% | 81% | ▲ 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Qizilqum's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss against Sogdiana. Games average 1.50 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Qizilqum vs Sogdiana?
The Uzbekistan Super League match finished Qizilqum 1:3 Sogdiana. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Qizilqum and Sogdiana?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Qizilqum won 0, Sogdiana won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Qizilqum vs Sogdiana?
Qizilqum score 0.67 goals per game on average and Sogdiana 1.17. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.42 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 17% of Qizilqum's matches and 67% of Sogdiana's.
What form are Qizilqum and Sogdiana in?
Over the last 5 games Qizilqum have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Sogdiana 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Qizilqum vs Sogdiana?
The statistical background for Qizilqum vs Sogdiana — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


