Uzbekistan - Uzbekistan Super LeagueData current as of September 07, 2026

Qizilqum vs Sogdiana: match statistics

Qizilqum crest
Qizilqum
1 : 3half-time 0:2
Sogdiana crest
Sogdiana

Qizilqum vs Sogdiana: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Qizilqum played against Sogdiana in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The game was played on April 13, 2026. Final score: 1:3.

Recent form

Qizilqum has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Sogdiana has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses, with 0.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Qizilqum scores 0.67 goals per game and allows 1.67. Sogdiana scores 1.17 and allows 2.67. Games in this league average 2.42 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 17% of Qizilqum's games and 67% of Sogdiana's. The Over 2.5 rates are 33% and 83%, compared with league averages of 49% for BTTS and 47% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Sogdiana has the higher season xG average, 1.27 to 1.16 per game. Qizilqum takes 10.8 shots per game, while Sogdiana takes 10.5.

First-half and second-half trends

Qizilqum leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.33 goals per game after halftime. Sogdiana leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.50 after halftime.

When the teams score

Qizilqum's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (2 goals). For Sogdiana, it is minutes 0-15 (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Uzbekistan Super League games average 2.42 goals. Both teams score in 49% of games, and 47% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Qizilqum have the edge due to better recent form and results: over the last five matches they averaged 1.2 points per game and have 2 wins this season, while Sogdiana average only 0.4 points per game in their last 5 and have yet to win away (0 wins). The home defense looks slightly more solid — Qizilqum concede 2.00 goals per game at home, whereas Sogdiana concede 2.67 goals away; the goal difference in home matches is -4 versus -5 for the visitors. Sogdiana’s attack is more efficient in terms of shot quality: the visitors average 3.0 shots on target per game and have an 11% conversion rate, while the hosts have 1.67 shots on target and a 6% conversion, and the xG for both teams is nearly identical (1.09 vs 1.08). However, the hosts have a high percentage of home matches without scoring — 67% — which can limit their effectiveness; meanwhile Sogdiana have no clean sheets (0%) and conceded 12 goals in the last five matches. Considering the hosts’ better points figures (1.2 vs 0.4), lower average goals conceded at home and the visitors’ lack of away wins, I project a Qizilqum victory, albeit by a modest margin and with a low total goal count.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I forecast BTTS - Yes at 70% probability because both teams have a seasonal BTTS rate of 67%. Neither Qizilqum nor Sogdiana has a clean sheet this season (0%) and both concede an average of 2.67 goals per match, which substantially increases the likelihood of both teams scoring. Offensively Qizilqum posts xG 1.46 and averages 1.33 goals with 5.33 shots on target, while Sogdiana has xG 1.08 and 1.0 goal with 3.0 shots on target, so both generate genuine scoring opportunities. Short-term signals are mixed — in the last 5 matches Qizilqum recorded only 20% BTTS and 0.8 goals on average, whereas Sogdiana has 80% BTTS and 1.4 goals on average — this reduces confidence but does not negate the seasonal trends. Given both teams’ 67% seasonal BTTS, Sogdiana’s 100% of matches over 2.5 goals and the absence of clean sheets, I recommend Yes (70%) over No (30%).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The modeled xG (average of attack and opponent defense) yields expected goals of 1.48 for Qizilqum and 1.30 for Sogdiana, totaling 2.78 goals. Applying a Poisson distribution to a 2.78 mean gives roughly a 76.5% probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5) and about a 52.6% probability of at least 3 goals (Over 2.5), while the chance of 4+ goals is around 30.3%. Seasonal stats reinforce the Over signal: both teams have 100% of matches with over 1.5 goals this season, Qizilqum has 67% of matches over 2.5 and Sogdiana 100% over 2.5, with BTTS at 67% for both. Additionally, hosts register 5.33 shots on target versus 3.0 for the visitors, and both teams concede an average of 2.67 goals per match, increasing the likelihood of further scoring. Considering the xG 1.48/1.30 and the dominant seasonal over1.5/over2.5 metrics, the strongest signal is Over 1.5, hence the recommendation to back the Over at the 1.5 line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is 1/1: the home side have higher xG (1.46 vs 1.08) and on average more shots on target (5.33 vs 3.00), which translates into more chances and greater probability of taking a lead at the break and securing the win. At half-time the hosts average 1.00 goal versus 0.33 for the visitors, and historically they led at the break in 33% of matches (1 of 3), confirming a trend of the home side opening the scoring. The visitors are in poorer form – winless in their last 5 matches (last 5: 'ldldl') and conceding an average of 2.4 goals in that period, while they concede 2.67 goals per game across the season, which hampers the possibility of a turnaround. Although both teams scored in 67% of matches, the higher xG and greater number of shots on target for the home team make the most reliable signal a Half-Time/Full-Time prediction of the home side leading at the break and winning by full-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 2
First half
1 : 1
Second half

Game stats

55Possession (%)45
QizilqumSogdiana
13Shots12
QizilqumSogdiana
3Shots on target6
QizilqumSogdiana
1.45xG1.61
QizilqumSogdiana
6Corners1
QizilqumSogdiana
59Dangerous attacks60
QizilqumSogdiana
8Fouls11
QizilqumSogdiana
1Cards4
QizilqumSogdiana

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

0.67Goals scored / game1.17
QizilqumSogdiana
1.67Goals allowed / game2.67
QizilqumSogdiana
43%Average possession44%
QizilqumSogdiana
2.17Shots on target / game4.17
QizilqumSogdiana

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10.83Shots per game10.5
QizilqumSogdiana
2.17Shots on target4.17
QizilqumSogdiana
6.2%Shot conversion11.1%
QizilqumSogdiana
43%Possession44%
QizilqumSogdiana
1.16xG for1.27
QizilqumSogdiana
1.43xG against1.51
QizilqumSogdiana

Shooting quality

Qizilqum: BalancedSogdiana: Balanced
QizilqumSogdiana
Accuracy (shots on target)20%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Qizilqum is 200% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / game - Qizilqum · 0.4 pts / game - Sogdiana

Qizilqum
WWLLL
Season result split
33% W0% R67% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-4
1.00 pts / game · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-2
Last 5 at home
1-0-2
WLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 1.28BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
Sogdiana
LDLDL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
0% W33% R67% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-2-4
0.33 pts / game · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-2
Last 5 away
0-1-2
LDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.37Opponent xG: 1.51BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Sogdiana is 75% better for: goals scored per game.

0.67 goals / game - Qizilqum · 1.17 goals / game - Sogdiana

Qizilqum is 60% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.67 goals / game - Qizilqum · 2.67 goals / game - Sogdiana

Qizilqum scoring profile: strong

Qizilqum scores in 33% of games (2 of 6 meczów), while Sogdiana keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 6 meczów).

Sogdiana scoring profile: very strong

Sogdiana scores in 67% of games (4 of 6 meczów), while Qizilqum keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 meczów).

4Goals scored (season)7
QizilqumSogdiana
10Goals conceded (season)16
QizilqumSogdiana
2.33Average goals per game3.83
QizilqumSogdiana
4Goals scored (last 5)7
QizilqumSogdiana
8Goals conceded (last 5)12
QizilqumSogdiana

How often they score at least...

33%1 goal67%
QizilqumSogdiana
33%2 goals50%
QizilqumSogdiana
0%3 goals0%
QizilqumSogdiana
0%4 goals0%
QizilqumSogdiana

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal100%
QizilqumSogdiana
50%2 goals100%
QizilqumSogdiana
17%3 goals33%
QizilqumSogdiana
17%4 goals33%
QizilqumSogdiana

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time17%
QizilqumSogdiana
0%BTTS in both halves17%
QizilqumSogdiana
33%Scored in both halves33%
QizilqumSogdiana

BTTS and goal count

17%Min. 3 goals and BTTS67%
QizilqumSogdiana
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
QizilqumSogdiana
20%BTTS - last 580%
QizilqumSogdiana

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

83%Min. 1 goal before half-time83%
QizilqumSogdiana
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time67%
QizilqumSogdiana
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
QizilqumSogdiana

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
QizilqumSogdiana
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time83%
QizilqumSogdiana
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time50%
QizilqumSogdiana

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Sogdiana is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.17 pts / game - Qizilqum · 1.33 pts / game - Sogdiana

Qizilqum - half-time state
33% leading17% draw50% trailing
Sogdiana - half-time state
33% leading33% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.17Points per game (1st half)1.33
QizilqumSogdiana
0.33Goals scored (1st half)0.67
QizilqumSogdiana
0.67Goals conceded (1st half)0.83
QizilqumSogdiana
1Average goals (1st half)1.5
QizilqumSogdiana
50%Clean sheet before half-time50%
QizilqumSogdiana
67%No goal before half-time50%
QizilqumSogdiana

After half-time (2nd half)

0.83Points per game (2nd half)0.17
QizilqumSogdiana
0.33Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
QizilqumSogdiana
1Goals conceded (2nd half)1.83
QizilqumSogdiana
1.33Average goals (2nd half)2.33
QizilqumSogdiana
33%Clean sheet after half-time17%
QizilqumSogdiana
67%No goal after half-time50%
QizilqumSogdiana

Qizilqum - second-half results

17% W33% R50% P
7
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Sogdiana - second-half results

0% W17% R83% P
8
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 0%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+1.0

Allows 1.0 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Qizilqum - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.00
Goals scored / game0.40.4
Goals allowed / game0.80.8
Average goals per game1.21.2
1 goal100%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-2-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Sogdiana - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.600.20
Goals scored / game0.80.6
Goals allowed / game0.61.8
Average goals per game1.42.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+1-6
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Qizilqum
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
2
16-30
2
2
31-45
0
3
46-60
0
1
61-75
2
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Sogdiana
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
0
1
16-30
2
2
31-45
0
5
46-60
1
2
61-75
2
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.09
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.7 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
128%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
42%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-51%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
22%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
22%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Qizilqum

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.73
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.49
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
52%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
150%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

Sogdiana

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-1.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
105%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
205%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 29% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).

Teams vs league

QizilqumLigaSogdiana
Average goals per game 2.332.42 3.83
Both teams scored 17%49% 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 33%47% 83%
Clean sheets 17%27% 0%
Goal before half-time 83%68% 83%
Goal after half-time 83%81% 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.42
Average goals per game
49%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.30
Home goals / game
1.11
Away goals / game
+17%
Home attack advantage
+15%
Home defensive advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. QizilqumSubstitutionOn: Samandar ShukurullayevOff: Grigol Chabradze
  2. SogdianaYellow cardNodirjon Soyibov
  3. SogdianaGoalLjupche Doriev
  4. SogdianaGoalFejsal MulićAssist: Ljupche Doriev
  5. SogdianaYellow cardJasur Jaloliddinov
  6. SogdianaSubstitutionOn: Tokhirbek To'khtasinovOff: Jasur Jaloliddinov
  7. QizilqumSubstitutionOn: Muhammadaziz IbrohimovOff: Jambul Jighauri
  8. SogdianaYellow cardOllobergan Karimov
  9. QizilqumSubstitutionOn: Shokhruz NorkhonovOff: Bobomurod Bozorov
  10. SogdianaYellow cardFilip Ivanović
  11. SogdianaSubstitutionOn: Javoxir KaxramonovOff: Ljupche Doriev
  12. SogdianaSubstitutionOn: Sukhrob IzzatovOff: Otabek Jo‘raqo‘ziev
  13. QizilqumSubstitutionOn: Ilkhomzhon KenzhaevOff: Fayzullobek Jumankuziev
  14. QizilqumYellow cardG'iyosjon Rizoqulov

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Qizilqum's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss against Sogdiana. Games average 1.50 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

FK Sogdiana Jizak
3 : 0
Qizilqum Zarafshon PFK
Qizilqum Zarafshon PFK
0 : 0
FK Sogdiana Jizak

FAQ

What was the result of Qizilqum vs Sogdiana?

The Uzbekistan Super League match finished Qizilqum 1:3 Sogdiana. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Qizilqum and Sogdiana?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Qizilqum won 0, Sogdiana won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Qizilqum vs Sogdiana?

Qizilqum score 0.67 goals per game on average and Sogdiana 1.17. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.42 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 17% of Qizilqum's matches and 67% of Sogdiana's.

What form are Qizilqum and Sogdiana in?

Over the last 5 games Qizilqum have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Sogdiana 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Qizilqum vs Sogdiana?

The statistical background for Qizilqum vs Sogdiana — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.