Queen's Park vs Arbroath: match statistics
Arbroath displays significantly better form and league position (3rd place) compared to Queen's Park (10th place). The visitors have a clearly better match record this season (10 wins compared to 3 for the hosts) and a higher shooting conversion rate – 12% shot conversion in away matches versus just 9% for the hosts at home. Queen's Park wins only 11% of their home matches and fails to score in as many as 44% of them, which represents a serious offensive problem. Arbroath has scored 10 goals in their last 5 matches and has better xG statistics (1.23 vs 1.09), indicating greater offensive potential. The visitors' form (1.6 points per game in their last 5 matches) surpasses the hosts' form (1.2 points), and Arbroath's high away win rate (42%) gives them a real chance for another three points.
Queen's Park vs Arbroath: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Queen's Park played against Arbroath in Championship (Scotland). The game was played on January 31, 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Queen's Park has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Arbroath has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Queen's Park scores 1.05 goals per game and allows 1.65. Arbroath scores 1.35 and allows 1.22. Games in this league average 2.50 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 65% of Queen's Park's games and 57% of Arbroath's. The Over 2.5 rates are 55% and 48%, compared with league averages of 51% for BTTS and 46% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Arbroath has the higher season xG average, 1.32 to 1.01 per game. Queen's Park takes 7.8 shots per game, while Arbroath takes 10.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Queen's Park leads at halftime in 20% of its games and scores 0.60 goals per game after halftime. Arbroath leads at halftime in 26% and scores 0.96 after halftime.
When the teams score
Queen's Park's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). For Arbroath, it is minutes 46-60 (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Championship games average 2.50 goals. Both teams score in 51% of games, and 46% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 4.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Arbroath displays significantly better form and league position (3rd place) compared to Queen's Park (10th place). The visitors have a clearly better match record this season (10 wins compared to 3 for the hosts) and a higher shooting conversion rate – 12% shot conversion in away matches versus just 9% for the hosts at home. Queen's Park wins only 11% of their home matches and fails to score in as many as 44% of them, which represents a serious offensive problem. Arbroath has scored 10 goals in their last 5 matches and has better xG statistics (1.23 vs 1.09), indicating greater offensive potential. The visitors' form (1.6 points per game in their last 5 matches) surpasses the hosts' form (1.2 points), and Arbroath's high away win rate (42%) gives them a real chance for another three points.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Queen's Park | Arbroath | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Arbroath is 60% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - Queen's Park · 1.6 pts / game - Arbroath
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Arbroath is 29% better for: goals scored per game.
1.05 goals / game - Queen's Park · 1.35 goals / game - Arbroath
Arbroath is 35% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.65 goals / game - Queen's Park · 1.22 goals / game - Arbroath
Queen's Park scores in 70% of games (14 of 20 meczów), while Arbroath keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 23 meczów).
Arbroath scores in 70% of games (16 of 23 meczów), while Queen's Park keeps a clean sheet in 25% (5 of 20 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Queen's Park
Over / Under - Arbroath
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Arbroath is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.1 pts / game - Queen's Park · 1.17 pts / game - Arbroath
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Queen's Park - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 15%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Arbroath - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 26% of games and wins 43%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Queen's Park
Arbroath
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Championship).
Teams vs league
| Queen's Park | Liga | Arbroath | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.70 | 2.50 | • 2.57 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 65% | 51% | ▲ 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 55% | 46% | ▲ 48% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 25% | 31% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | • 70% | 69% | ▼ 61% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 75% | 73% | ▲ 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Queen's Park's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses against Arbroath. Games average 4.50 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Queen's Park vs Arbroath?
The Championship match finished Queen's Park 2:1 Arbroath. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Queen's Park and Arbroath?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Queen's Park won 0, Arbroath won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Queen's Park vs Arbroath?
Queen's Park score 1.05 goals per game on average and Arbroath 1.35. The Championship average is 2.50 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Queen's Park's matches and 57% of Arbroath's.
What form are Queen's Park and Arbroath in?
Over the last 5 games Queen's Park have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Arbroath 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Queen's Park vs Arbroath?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.