Scotland - ChampionshipOchilview ParkData current as of October 17, 2026

Queen's Park vs Inverness CT: match statistics

Queen's Park crest
Queen's Park
2 : 1half-time 2:1
Inverness CT crest
Inverness CT

Queen's Park vs Inverness CT: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Queen's Park played against Inverness CT in Championship (Scotland). The game was played on October 13, 2026. Venue: Ochilview Park. Final score: 2:1.

Recent form

Queen's Park has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. Inverness CT has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Queen's Park scores 0.44 goals per game and allows 1.67. Inverness CT scores 1.22 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.06 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 33% of Queen's Park's games and 44% of Inverness CT's. The Over 2.5 rates are 33% and 33%, compared with league averages of 38% for BTTS and 30% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Inverness CT has the higher season xG average, 1.26 to 0.81 per game. Queen's Park takes 4.8 shots per game, while Inverness CT takes 8.7.

First-half and second-half trends

Queen's Park leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 0.33 goals per game after halftime. Inverness CT leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.67 after halftime.

When the teams score

Queen's Park's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (1 goals). For Inverness CT, it is minutes 16-30 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Championship games average 2.06 goals. Both teams score in 38% of games, and 30% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Inverness CT are more likely to win: they have picked up 7 points in their last 5 matches, compared with just 4 for Queen's Park. The visitors average 1.5 goals per away match, while the hosts manage just 0.75 at home and have failed to score in half of those games. The quality of chances also favors Inverness, whose away xG stands at 1.18, compared with Queen's Park's 1.00 at home. The hosts have lost 3 of their 4 home matches and concede an average of 1.75 goals in them, although Inverness's 2 draws in 4 away games mean a share of the points remains a realistic outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

It is more likely that at least one team will fail to score, primarily because of Queen's Park's poor finishing. The hosts average 0.75 goals per match and have failed to score in 50% of their games, while Inverness CT average 1.5 goals and have drawn a blank in 25% of matches. The attacking gap has also been clear over their last five outings: Queen's Park averaged 0.6 goals, compared with 1.6 for the visitors. The case for BTTS - Yes is supported by the fact that Inverness CT concede an average of 1.5 goals, but BTTS has landed in only 25% of the hosts' matches, compared with 36% across the league. Therefore, despite the visitors' attacking threat, Queen's Park failing to score remains the main risk to BTTS.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

In the teams’ matches to date, at least 2 goals have been scored in 75% of cases, providing the strongest signal for Over 1.5 goals. Inverness average 1.5 goals per match, while Queen's Park score 0.75, but have conceded an average of 1.4 goals across their last 5 games. On the other hand, all of Queen's Park’s matches to date have finished Under 2.5 goals, and the league average is 2.02 goals, making higher goal lines less convincing. The 2.3-goal forecast accounts for both the visitors’ attacking potential and the more cautious pattern in the hosts’ matches; Over 1.5 goals is the preferred play.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

In their last five matches, Queen's Park have yet to lead at the break and were trailing at half-time in three of those five games, while Inverness led in two. During this run, the hosts averaged just 0.2 goals before half-time and conceded 1.2, pointing to a greater chance of the visitors taking an early lead. Inverness have recently scored 1.6 goals per match compared with Queen's Park's 0.6, and averaged 1.0 goals after the break against the hosts' 0.4, giving them a case for maintaining their advantage until the final whistle. The forecast is tempered by the hosts' higher xG, at 1.29 compared with the visitors' 1.18, but given both teams' current scoring form, Inverness to lead at half-time and win remains the most likely HT/FT outcome.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

2 : 1
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

33Possession (%)67
Queen's ParkInverness CT
6Shots23
Queen's ParkInverness CT
5Shots on target9
Queen's ParkInverness CT
0.95xG2.64
Queen's ParkInverness CT
5Corners11
Queen's ParkInverness CT
29Dangerous attacks79
Queen's ParkInverness CT
9Fouls11
Queen's ParkInverness CT
1Cards1
Queen's ParkInverness CT

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Queen's ParkInverness CT
0.44Goals scored / game1.22
Queen's ParkInverness CT
1.67Goals allowed / game1
Queen's ParkInverness CT
44%Average possession54%
Queen's ParkInverness CT
2.22Shots on target / game4.56
Queen's ParkInverness CT

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

4.78Shots per game8.67
Queen's ParkInverness CT
2.22Shots on target4.56
Queen's ParkInverness CT
9.3%Shot conversion14.1%
Queen's ParkInverness CT
44%Possession54%
Queen's ParkInverness CT
0.81xG for1.26
Queen's ParkInverness CT
1.54xG against0.95
Queen's ParkInverness CT

Shooting quality

Queen's Park: BalancedInverness CT: Efficient finishing
Queen's ParkInverness CT
Accuracy (shots on target)46%53%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.170.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.200.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Inverness CT is 233% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / game - Queen's Park · 2 pts / game - Inverness CT

Queen's Park
WLLLL
Season result split
11% W11% D78% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-7
0.44 pts / game · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-3
Last 5 at home
1-0-3
LLWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 0.97Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Inverness CT
LWDWW
Season result split
33% W44% D22% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-4-2
1.44 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-1
Last 5 away
1-2-1
DLWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.25Opponent xG: 0.97BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Inverness CT is 177% better for: goals scored per game.

0.44 goals / game - Queen's Park · 1.22 goals / game - Inverness CT

Inverness CT is 67% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.67 goals / game - Queen's Park · 1 goals / game - Inverness CT

Queen's Park scoring profile: more difficult

Queen's Park scores in 33% of games (3 of 9 games), while Inverness CT keeps a clean sheet in 44% (4 of 9 games).

Inverness CT scoring profile: very strong

Inverness CT scores in 67% of games (6 of 9 games), while Queen's Park keeps a clean sheet in 11% (1 of 9 games).

4Goals scored (season)11
Queen's ParkInverness CT
15Goals conceded (season)9
Queen's ParkInverness CT
2.11Average goals per game2.22
Queen's ParkInverness CT
3Goals scored (last 5)9
Queen's ParkInverness CT
9Goals conceded (last 5)5
Queen's ParkInverness CT

How often they score at least...

33%1 goal67%
Queen's ParkInverness CT
11%2 goals44%
Queen's ParkInverness CT
0%3 goals11%
Queen's ParkInverness CT
0%4 goals0%
Queen's ParkInverness CT

How often they concede at least...

89%1 goal56%
Queen's ParkInverness CT
78%2 goals33%
Queen's ParkInverness CT
0%3 goals11%
Queen's ParkInverness CT
0%4 goals0%
Queen's ParkInverness CT

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

38%
League average

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time11%
Queen's ParkInverness CT
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Queen's ParkInverness CT
11%Scored in both halves22%
Queen's ParkInverness CT

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
Queen's ParkInverness CT
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Queen's ParkInverness CT
40%BTTS - last 540%
Queen's ParkInverness CT

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time78%
Queen's ParkInverness CT
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time22%
Queen's ParkInverness CT
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
Queen's ParkInverness CT

2nd half

78%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
Queen's ParkInverness CT
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time22%
Queen's ParkInverness CT
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time22%
Queen's ParkInverness CT

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Inverness CT is 177% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.44 pts / game - Queen's Park · 1.22 pts / game - Inverness CT

Queen's Park - half-time state
0% leading44% draw56% trailing
Inverness CT - half-time state
33% leading22% draw44% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.44Points per game (1st half)1.22
Queen's ParkInverness CT
0.11Goals scored (1st half)0.56
Queen's ParkInverness CT
0.89Goals conceded (1st half)0.56
Queen's ParkInverness CT
1Average goals (1st half)1.11
Queen's ParkInverness CT
33%Clean sheet before half-time44%
Queen's ParkInverness CT
89%No goal before half-time67%
Queen's ParkInverness CT

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per game (2nd half)1.67
Queen's ParkInverness CT
0.33Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
Queen's ParkInverness CT
0.78Goals conceded (2nd half)0.44
Queen's ParkInverness CT
1.11Average goals (2nd half)1.11
Queen's ParkInverness CT
44%Clean sheet after half-time67%
Queen's ParkInverness CT
67%No goal after half-time44%
Queen's ParkInverness CT

Queen's Park - second-half results

22% W33% D44% L
4
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.44
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Inverness CT - second-half results

44% W33% D22% L
11
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.22
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Queen's Park - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.201.40
Goals scored / game0.20.4
Goals allowed / game1.40.4
Average goals per game1.60.8
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet0%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-60
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Inverness CT - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.802.00
Goals scored / game1.00.8
Goals allowed / game0.60.4
Average goals per game1.61.2
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+2+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Queen's Park
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
1
2
16-30
0
4
31-45
1
3
46-60
1
2
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Inverness CT
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
3
4
16-30
1
0
31-45
2
2
46-60
3
0
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.17
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
0.7 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
39%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
22%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
22%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Queen's Park

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.73
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.50
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.37
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
38%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
188%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.16
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Inverness CT

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
137%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
85%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.56
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
9% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
9%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Championship).

Teams vs league

Queen's ParkLigaInverness CT
Average goals per game• 2.112.06▲ 2.22
Both teams scored▼ 33%38%▲ 44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 33%30%▲ 33%
Clean sheets▼ 11%35%▲ 44%
Goal before half-time• 67%68%▲ 78%
Goal after half-time▲ 78%68%• 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.06
Average goals per game
38%
Both teams scored
30%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
35%
Clean sheets
1.17
Home goals / game
0.89
Away goals / game
+31%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defensive advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Inverness CTGoalGraeme Shinnie
  2. Queen's ParkGoalAidan ConnollyAssist: Lewis Stewart
  3. Queen's ParkGoalAidan ConnollyAssist: Michael Ruth
  4. Queen's ParkSubstitutionOn: Callum SmithOff: Ben Brannan
  5. Queen's ParkYellow cardMichael Ruth
  6. Inverness CTYellow cardLayton Stewart
  7. Inverness CTSubstitutionOn: Detlef Esapa OsongOff: Layton Stewart
  8. Inverness CTSubstitutionOn: David WotherspoonOff: Adam Mackinnon

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Queen's Park vs Inverness CT?

The Championship match finished Queen's Park 2:1 Inverness CT. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Queen's Park vs Inverness CT?

Queen's Park score 0.44 goals per game on average and Inverness CT 1.22. The Championship average is 2.06 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 30% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Queen's Park's matches and 44% of Inverness CT's.

What form are Queen's Park and Inverness CT in?

Over the last 5 games Queen's Park have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Inverness CT 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Queen's Park vs Inverness CT?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.