Queen's Park vs Partick Thistle: match statistics
Queen's Park vs Partick Thistle: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Queen's Park played against Partick Thistle in Championship (Scotland). The game was played on November 7, 2026. Venue: Ochilview Park. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
Queen's Park has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. Partick Thistle has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Queen's Park scores 0.62 goals per game and allows 1.69. Partick Thistle scores 1.31 and allows 0.54. Games in this league average 2.15 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 38% of Queen's Park's games and 31% of Partick Thistle's. The Over 2.5 rates are 38% and 31%, compared with league averages of 37% for BTTS and 32% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Partick Thistle has the higher season xG average, 1.66 to 0.89 per game. Queen's Park takes 5.8 shots per game, while Partick Thistle takes 12.7.
First-half and second-half trends
Queen's Park leads at halftime in 8% of its games and scores 0.38 goals per game after halftime. Partick Thistle leads at halftime in 54% and scores 0.31 after halftime.
When the teams score
Queen's Park's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (2 goals). For Partick Thistle, it is minutes 0-15 (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Championship games average 2.15 goals. Both teams score in 37% of games, and 32% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 5 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 3 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 2.40 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Partick Thistle sit top of the table with 7 wins from 13 matches, while Queen's Park are 10th and have lost 10 of their 13 games. In their last five matches, the visitors have recorded 3 wins and scored 9 goals, while the hosts have won just once and scored 4. Away from home, Partick average 10.5 shots and an xG of 1.36, compared with Queen's Park's 5.33 shots and 0.95 xG at home, indicating that the visitors are better at creating chances. The defensive gap is also clear: Partick concede an average of 0.67 goals away from home, while Queen's Park concede 1.5 at home and have yet to keep a clean sheet there. Although 33% of the league leaders' away matches have ended in a draw, their superior form and chance quality point to an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest argument for BTTS - No is Queen’s Park’s home defensive record: the hosts kept a clean sheet in 86% of these matches and limited opponents to an average of 0.64 xG. Partick Thistle score an average of 1.00 goal away from home, so it is far from certain they will maintain that rate against the hosts. However, recent form calls for a more cautious assessment: Queen’s Park conceded an average of 1.8 goals across their previous five matches, while Partick scored 1.8 goals per game over the same period. Even so, BTTS - Yes landed in only 14% of Queen’s Park’s home matches, compared with 50% of Partick’s away matches, so it is slightly more likely that at least one team will fail to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The strongest signal is Under 3.5 goals: this line has held in 86% of Queen's Park's home matches and in every away fixture played by Partick Thistle. The visitors concede an average of 0.67 goals away from home, while the hosts concede 0.43 per home match, pointing away from a high-scoring game. Caution is warranted, however: Queen's Park have conceded an average of 1.8 goals across their last five matches, while Partick Thistle have scored 1.8. This increased threat weakens the case for the 2.5 line, but with a projected total of 2.30 goals, the 3.5 line still offers a clearer edge. In addition, the league average is 2.19 goals, so a result with at least four goals would require a marked departure from the competition's typical scoring level.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal is current form: Queen’s Park were trailing at half-time in 4 of their last 5 matches, while Partick Thistle were leading at the break in 3 of 5. Over this period, the visitors scored an average of 1.4 goals before half-time, while the hosts conceded 1.2, which supports the prospect of Partick Thistle leading at half-time. After the break, Queen’s Park drew the second half in 4 of 5 matches and scored an average of only 0.4 goals, making a turnaround less likely than the visitors holding on to their lead. The 2/2 pick is also supported by the teams’ results in their last five matches: Partick Thistle won 3 and scored an average of 1.8 goals, while Queen’s Park lost 4 and conceded an average of 1.8 goals. The risk to this selection is the hosts’ strong season-long statistics, including leading at half-time in 71% of matches, so the case for the 2/2 scenario is not conclusive.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Queen's Park | Partick Thistle | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 46% | 44% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.23 | 0.23 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Partick Thistle is 233% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / game - Queen's Park · 2 pts / game - Partick Thistle
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Partick Thistle is 111% better for: goals scored per game.
0.62 goals / game - Queen's Park · 1.31 goals / game - Partick Thistle
Partick Thistle is 213% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.69 goals / game - Queen's Park · 0.54 goals / game - Partick Thistle
Queen's Park scores in 38% of games (5 of 13 games), while Partick Thistle keeps a clean sheet in 62% (8 of 13 games).
Partick Thistle scores in 77% of games (10 of 13 games), while Queen's Park keeps a clean sheet in 8% (1 of 13 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Queen's Park
Over / Under - Partick Thistle
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Partick Thistle is 285% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.54 pts / game - Queen's Park · 2.08 pts / game - Partick Thistle
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Queen's Park - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 8% of games and wins 15%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Partick Thistle - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 54% of games and wins 54%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 0% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +4 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Queen's Park
Partick Thistle
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Championship).
Teams vs league
| Queen's Park | Liga | Partick Thistle | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.31 | 2.15 | ▼ 1.85 |
| Both teams scored | • 38% | 37% | ▼ 31% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 38% | 32% | • 31% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 8% | 36% | ▲ 62% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 77% | 71% | ▼ 69% |
| Goal after half-time | • 62% | 63% | ▼ 54% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Queen's Park's perspective: 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses against Partick Thistle. Games average 2.40 goals, and both teams scored in 40% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Queen's Park vs Partick Thistle?
The Championship match finished Queen's Park 0:1 Partick Thistle. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Queen's Park and Partick Thistle?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches Queen's Park won 0, Partick Thistle won 2 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 2.40 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Queen's Park vs Partick Thistle?
Queen's Park score 0.62 goals per game on average and Partick Thistle 1.31. The Championship average is 2.15 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 32% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Queen's Park's matches and 31% of Partick Thistle's.
What form are Queen's Park and Partick Thistle in?
Over the last 5 games Queen's Park have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Partick Thistle 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Queen's Park vs Partick Thistle?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Queen's Park vs Partick Thistle: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.