Quevilly Rouen vs Fleury 91: match statistics
Quevilly Rouen vs Fleury 91: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Quevilly Rouen played against Fleury 91 in National (France). The game was played on August 29, 2026. Venue: Stade Robert Diochon. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Quevilly Rouen has 0 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.33 points per game. Fleury 91 has 0 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 0.67 points per game.
Scoring records
Quevilly Rouen scores 0.33 goals per game and allows 1.67. Fleury 91 scores 0.33 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.32 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 33% of Quevilly Rouen's games and 33% of Fleury 91's. The Over 2.5 rates are 33% and 0%, compared with league averages of 32% for BTTS and 32% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Fleury 91 has the higher season xG average, 0.96 to 0.86 per game. Quevilly Rouen takes 7.7 shots per game, while Fleury 91 takes 6.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Quevilly Rouen leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.00 goals per game after halftime. Fleury 91 leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
Quevilly Rouen's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (1 goals). For Fleury 91, it is minutes 31-45+ (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
National games average 2.32 goals. Both teams score in 32% of games, and 32% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Neither team has recorded a league win: Quevilly Rouen have a record of 0 wins, 1 draw and 2 defeats, while Fleury 91 have registered 0 wins, 2 draws and 1 defeat. Quevilly have drawn 100% of their home matches so far, while Fleury have done the same in every away game to date, which strongly supports the prospect of a share of the points. The hosts are creating slightly better chances, however, with an average xG of 0.73 compared with the visitors’ 0.68, and also enjoy more possession at 53% to 50%. Fleury are marginally more solid without the ball, allowing opponents an xG of 1.27 compared with Quevilly’s 1.47, although both teams average just 1 goal per match in these conditions. Recent form offers no clear advantage to either side: Quevilly have collected 0.8 points per game across their last five appearances, compared with 0.4 for Fleury, making a low-scoring draw the most likely outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
A strong signal for BTTS - No is driven by the very limited attacking efficiency of both teams: in their last 5 matches, Quevilly Rouen and Fleury 91 have scored just 0.4 goals per game on average each. The hosts have failed to score in 100% of their league matches at home, with their BTTS rate at this venue standing at 0%, while Fleury’s average away xG is only 0.68. Recent form also does not support a goal exchange, as BTTS occurred in just 20% of Quevilly’s last five matches and 40% of Fleury’s, compared with a league average of 33%. Fleury have yet to keep a clean sheet, but Quevilly generate only 1.10 xG on average and record 4.5 shots on target per match, making it more likely that at least one team will fail to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Both teams have finished all of their league matches so far with fewer than 2.5 and fewer than 3.5 goals, clearly indicating a low goal ceiling. In their last five matches, Quevilly Rouen and Fleury 91 have averaged just 0.4 goals scored each, while their average xG stood at 1.30 and 0.80, respectively. Fleury register only 4.0 shots per match, including 2.0 on target, while the hosts, despite averaging 4.5 shots on target, have yet to score in the current campaign. Although both teams’ defenses have conceded 1.6 and 2.0 goals, respectively, across their last five matches, the xG they have allowed remains similar, at 1.27 and 1.29. Therefore, a result in the 1–2 goal range is more likely than an open, high-scoring game. The Under 3.5 goals line offers the strongest safety margin, with a projected total of 1.90 goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time and after the final whistle, as both teams have averaged just 0.2 goals before the break across their last five matches, with neither side scoring in the first half in any of those games. Fleury were level at half-time in 40% of their recent matches, while Quevilly Rouen have a clear advantage in chance creation: their average xG stands at 1.10 compared with the opponents’ 0.68, and they average 4.5 shots on target against 2.0. At the same time, the hosts’ finishing is a concern, as they have scored just 0.4 goals per game over their last five outings and failed to find the net in 80% of those matches. The visitors have also averaged 0.4 goals, but conceded as many as 2.0 per match, increasing the likelihood of Quevilly levelling the score or preserving the draw after a cautious opening. Given both teams’ poor current form, Fleury’s five-match winless run and their 40% draw rate, the X/X HT/FT outcome is the most likely.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Quevilly Rouen | Fleury 91 | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 22% | 58% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.20 | 0.09 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Fleury 91 is 103% better for: last-5 form.
0.33 pts / game - Quevilly Rouen · 0.67 pts / game - Fleury 91
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Fleury 91 is 67% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.67 goals / game - Quevilly Rouen · 1 goals / game - Fleury 91
Quevilly Rouen scores in 33% of games (1 of 3 meczów), while Fleury 91 keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 meczów).
Fleury 91 scores in 33% of games (1 of 3 meczów), while Quevilly Rouen keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Quevilly Rouen
Over / Under - Fleury 91
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Fleury 91 is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / game - Quevilly Rouen · 1.33 pts / game - Fleury 91
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Quevilly Rouen - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 0%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Fleury 91 - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 0%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.33 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.3 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.7 |
| Average goals per game | 1.3 | 0.7 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 67% |
| 2 goals | 33% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 33% | 33% |
| No goal | 67% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.33 | 0.33 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.3 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.3 | 0.7 |
| Average goals per game | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| 1 goal | 67% | 67% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 67% | 33% |
| No goal | 67% | 100% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Quevilly Rouen
Fleury 91
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (National).
Teams vs league
| Quevilly Rouen | Liga | Fleury 91 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.00 | 2.32 | ▼ 1.33 |
| Both teams scored | • 33% | 32% | • 33% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 33% | 32% | ▼ 0% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 38% | ▼ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 86% | ▼ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 67% | 64% | ▲ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Quevilly Rouen's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss against Fleury 91. Games average 2.50 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Quevilly Rouen vs Fleury 91?
The National match finished Quevilly Rouen 2:1 Fleury 91. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Quevilly Rouen and Fleury 91?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Quevilly Rouen won 0, Fleury 91 won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Quevilly Rouen vs Fleury 91?
Quevilly Rouen score 0.33 goals per game on average and Fleury 91 0.33. The National average is 2.32 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 32% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Quevilly Rouen's matches and 33% of Fleury 91's.
What form are Quevilly Rouen and Fleury 91 in?
Over the last 5 games Quevilly Rouen have a 0-1-2 record (0.33 points per game) and Fleury 91 0-2-1 (0.67 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Quevilly Rouen vs Fleury 91?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Quevilly Rouen vs Fleury 91: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.