Argentina - Prim B NacionalData current as of 22 July 2026

Quilmes vs Midland: match statistics

Quilmes crest
Quilmes
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Midland crest
Midland
135%(1.70)
X35%(3.00)
230%(4.90)

Statistical analysis indicates a very evenly matched contest between two teams in poor form. Quilmes displays alarming form with just 0.4 points per game in their last 5 matches and a lddll run, failing to win a single game. Midland shows slightly better overall form (1.4 PPG, wwldl run), however, in away matches they have a 100% loss record and concede an average of 2 goals per game. The visitors have scored more goals recently (10 vs 1), but their away defense is very weak. Considering the crisis of both teams and the mental advantage of playing at home for Quilmes, combined with Midland's offensive edge but defensive issues, the most likely scenario is a draw in a low-scoring match.

Quilmes vs Midland: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Quilmes play Midland in Prim B Nacional (Argentina). The match date is 22 February 2026 at 00:00. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Quilmes: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Midland: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Quilmes scores 0.90 and concedes 0.80 goals per match. Midland scores 1.05 and concedes 0.75. League average: 1.89 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Quilmes 25%, Midland 40%. Over 2.5: Quilmes 35%, Midland 25%. League level: BTTS 39%, Over 2.5 30%.

xG, shots and style

Midland has higher xG: 1.76 vs 1.35. Quilmes: 10.7 shots per match, Midland: 14.4.

Match halves

Quilmes: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.50. Midland: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.60.

Goals by minute

Quilmes: 31-45+ (5 goals). Midland: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Prim B Nacional: 1.89 goals per match, BTTS 39%, Over 2.5 30%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Statistical analysis indicates a very evenly matched contest between two teams in poor form. Quilmes displays alarming form with just 0.4 points per game in their last 5 matches and a lddll run, failing to win a single game. Midland shows slightly better overall form (1.4 PPG, wwldl run), however, in away matches they have a 100% loss record and concede an average of 2 goals per game. The visitors have scored more goals recently (10 vs 1), but their away defense is very weak. Considering the crisis of both teams and the mental advantage of playing at home for Quilmes, combined with Midland's offensive edge but defensive issues, the most likely scenario is a draw in a low-scoring match.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

51Possession (%)49
QuilmesMidland
3Shots16
QuilmesMidland
0Shots on target5
QuilmesMidland
0.49xG1.55
QuilmesMidland
5Corners7
QuilmesMidland
38Dangerous attacks25
QuilmesMidland
11Fouls9
QuilmesMidland
0Cards1
QuilmesMidland

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.9Goals scored / match1.05
QuilmesMidland
0.8Goals conceded / match0.75
QuilmesMidland
47%Average possession53%
QuilmesMidland
3.15Shots on target / match4.8
QuilmesMidland

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.7Shots per match14.4
QuilmesMidland
3.15Shots on target4.8
QuilmesMidland
8.4%Shot conversion7.3%
QuilmesMidland
47%Possession53%
QuilmesMidland
1.35xG for1.76
QuilmesMidland
1.26xG against1.23
QuilmesMidland

Shooting quality

Quilmes: BalancedMidland: Attacking
QuilmesMidland
Accuracy (shots on target)29%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.22

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Quilmes is 40% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Quilmes · 1 pts / match - Midland

Quilmes
DWLWL
Season result split
30% W30% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-6-8
1.20 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-3-1
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
DLWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 0.97BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Midland
LLDDW
Season result split
40% W30% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-6-6
1.50 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-3-4
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LWLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.46Opponent xG: 1.25BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Midland is 17% better for: goals scored per match.

0.9 goals / match - Quilmes · 1.05 goals / match - Midland

Midland is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.8 goals / match - Quilmes · 0.75 goals / match - Midland

Quilmes scoring profile: mixed

Quilmes scores in 45% of matches (9 of 20 matches), while Midland keeps a clean sheet in 40% (8 of 20 matches).

Midland scoring profile: strong

Midland scores in 70% of matches (14 of 20 matches), while Quilmes keeps a clean sheet in 45% (9 of 20 matches).

18Goals scored (season)21
QuilmesMidland
16Goals conceded (season)15
QuilmesMidland
1.7Average goals in match1.8
QuilmesMidland
4Goals scored (last 5)4
QuilmesMidland
5Goals conceded (last 5)5
QuilmesMidland

How often they score at least...

45%1 goal70%
QuilmesMidland
30%2 goals30%
QuilmesMidland
15%3 goals5%
QuilmesMidland
0%4 goals0%
QuilmesMidland

How often they concede at least...

55%1 goal60%
QuilmesMidland
15%2 goals15%
QuilmesMidland
10%3 goals0%
QuilmesMidland
0%4 goals0%
QuilmesMidland

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

5%BTTS at half-time10%
QuilmesMidland
5%BTTS in both halves0%
QuilmesMidland
25%Scored in both halves30%
QuilmesMidland

BTTS and goal count

25%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
QuilmesMidland
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
QuilmesMidland
40%BTTS - last 560%
QuilmesMidland

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
QuilmesMidland
15%Min. 2 goals before half-time15%
QuilmesMidland
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
QuilmesMidland

2nd half

55%Min. 1 goal after half-time85%
QuilmesMidland
25%Min. 2 goals after half-time15%
QuilmesMidland
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time5%
QuilmesMidland

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Midland is 24% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.25 pts / match - Quilmes · 1.55 pts / match - Midland

Quilmes - half-time state
25% leading50% draw25% trailing
Midland - half-time state
35% leading50% draw15% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.25Points per match (1st half)1.55
QuilmesMidland
0.4Goals scored (1st half)0.45
QuilmesMidland
0.3Goals conceded (1st half)0.3
QuilmesMidland
0.7Average goals (1st half)0.75
QuilmesMidland
75%Clean sheet before half-time75%
QuilmesMidland
70%No goal before half-time55%
QuilmesMidland

After half-time (2nd half)

1.25Points per match (2nd half)1.55
QuilmesMidland
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.6
QuilmesMidland
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.45
QuilmesMidland
1Average goals (2nd half)1.05
QuilmesMidland
60%Clean sheet after half-time60%
QuilmesMidland
60%No goal after half-time45%
QuilmesMidland

Quilmes - second-half results

25% W50% R25% P
25
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding120%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Midland - second-half results

45% W20% R35% P
31
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.55
PPG before half-time
Lead holding114%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Quilmes - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match0.41.4
1 goal40%60%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Midland - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.80
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-2+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Quilmes
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
2
2
16-30
5
0
31-45
2
4
46-60
4
1
61-75
4
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Midland
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
2
3
16-30
5
2
31-45
3
4
46-60
2
0
61-75
7
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.75
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
33%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-43%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
32%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
17%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Quilmes

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.45
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.46
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
79%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
107%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Midland

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.53
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.23
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.71
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.48
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
140%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
66%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.50
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Prim B Nacional).

Teams vs league

QuilmesLigaMidland
Average goals in match 1.701.89 1.80
Both teams scored 25%39% 40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 35%30% 25%
Clean sheets 45%39% 40%
Goal before half-time 50%56% 60%
Goal after half-time 55%70% 85%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.89
Average goals per match
39%
Both teams scored
30%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.14
Home goals / match
0.75
Away goals / match
+52%
Home attack advantage
+34%
Home defence advantage
+24%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
26%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Quilmes 0 - 0 - 1 Midland. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Quilmes vs Midland?

The Prim B Nacional match finished Quilmes 0:0 Midland. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Quilmes vs Midland?

Quilmes score 0.90 goals per game on average and Midland 1.05. The Prim B Nacional average is 1.89 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 30% of games. Both teams score in 25% of Quilmes's matches and 40% of Midland's.

What form are Quilmes and Midland in?

Over the last 5 games Quilmes have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Midland 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Quilmes vs Midland?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.