Argentina - Prim B NacionalEstadio Miguel SanchoData current as of September 06, 2026

Racing Córdoba vs San Telmo: match statistics

Racing Córdoba crest
Racing Córdoba
2 : 1half-time 1:0
San Telmo crest
San Telmo

Racing Córdoba vs San Telmo: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Racing Córdoba played against San Telmo in Prim B Nacional (Argentina). The game was played on July 26, 2026. Venue: Estadio Miguel Sancho. Final score: 2:1.

Recent form

Racing Córdoba has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. San Telmo has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Racing Córdoba scores 0.95 goals per game and allows 1.19. San Telmo scores 0.80 and allows 1.05. Games in this league average 1.88 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 43% of Racing Córdoba's games and 35% of San Telmo's. The Over 2.5 rates are 43% and 30%, compared with league averages of 39% for BTTS and 31% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Racing Córdoba has the higher season xG average, 1.41 to 1.31 per game. Racing Córdoba takes 11.6 shots per game, while San Telmo takes 9.7.

First-half and second-half trends

Racing Córdoba leads at halftime in 19% of its games and scores 0.62 goals per game after halftime. San Telmo leads at halftime in 20% and scores 0.35 after halftime.

When the teams score

Racing Córdoba's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (5 goals). For San Telmo, it is minutes 0-15 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Prim B Nacional games average 1.88 goals. Both teams score in 39% of games, and 31% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Racing Córdoba is the favorite in this fixture: at home they average 1.4 goals per match with an average xG of 1.58, while San Telmo register only 0.56 goals away with xG 0.85. The hosts create significantly more chances — 12.8 shots and 3.8 on target per home match versus 6.11 shots and 1.78 on target in away games for the visitors — and have a higher conversion rate (11% vs 9%). Racing controls the game (55% possession at home vs 46% for San Telmo) and less frequently finish matches goalless (FTS 30% for the hosts vs 56% for the visitors), which limits San Telmo’s offensive opportunities. Defensively the average goals conceded are similar (0.90 for Racing vs 0.89 for San Telmo), but the visitors concede far more high-quality chances (xG against 1.73 for San Telmo vs 0.99 for Racing), which favors the hosts. In the last 5 matches Racing have 1.4 points per game with 2 wins, while San Telmo have only 1.0 points and 1 win; additionally San Telmo are yet to win away (win% = 0), therefore I predict a home victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Racing Córdoba creates significantly more chances than San Telmo: on average 12.55 shots and 4.27 shots on target with xG 1.68 versus 6.11 shots and 1.78 on target with xG 0.85 for the visitors, translating into a seasonal goals average of 1.00 for Racing and 0.56 for San Telmo. The home side has a high clean sheet rate — 45% of matches — and a low seasonal BTTS rate of 27%, while San Telmo has 33% clean sheets and 44% BTTS, indicating matches involving Racing more often finish with at least one clean sheet. In the last 5 fixtures both teams have 40% of matches with both teams scoring, but Racing averages 1.2 goals over the last 5 while San Telmo only 0.8, so in the short term the visitors still score less frequently. Considering the low away goals average (0.56), San Telmo’s poor shots on target (1.78) and Racing’s superiority in chance creation (12.55 shots, xG 1.68), a No BTTS scenario is more likely — I assess it at 70% for 'no' and 30% for 'yes'.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The forecast is based on xG: Racing Córdoba has xG_for 1.68 vs 0.85 for San Telmo, and xG_against for San Telmo is 1.73 vs 1.41 for Racing, which averaged gives expected goals of 1.71 for the home side and 1.13 for the visitors (total 2.84). A Poisson model with these λ shows the probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5) is around 77–78%, so Over 1.5 is the strongest signal. Over 2.5 is moderate — about 54% for over vs 46% for under — while Over 3.5 is only ~32% (Under ~68%), making larger lines less attractive. Additionally Racing creates many chances: on average 12.55 shots and 4.27 shots on target, compared to 6.11 and 1.78 for San Telmo, and season metrics show Racing has Over1.5 in 64% of matches, San Telmo in 44%, which supports the Over 1.5 bet. At the same time BTTS rates — 27% for Racing and 44% for San Telmo — suggest that an Over 1.5 selection without needing to take a high line (>2.5) offers the best risk-to-expected-return profile.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is X/1 (draw at Half-Time, Racing Córdoba win at Full-Time). Racing has a clear offensive advantage: xG 1.68 versus 0.85 for San Telmo, 12.55 shots per match versus 6.11 and 4.27 shots on target versus 1.78, indicating more chances especially after the break. However, a draw at the break is common — the home side has HT draws in 45% of matches, and San Telmo in 56%, with average goals by Half-Time 0.55 (Racing) vs 0.33 (San Telmo), so I expect a draw after 45 minutes. San Telmo have no away wins in the stats (winPercentage_away 0.0) and draw 67% of away matches, while Racing have 36% home wins and a season average of 1.27 points per match, which increases the likelihood of a turnaround in the second half.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
1 : 1
Second half

Game stats

44Possession (%)56
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo
15Shots7
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo
7Shots on target1
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo
2.01xG0.94
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo
5Corners3
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo
80Dangerous attacks58
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo
7Fouls18
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo
0Cards2
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Racing CórdobaSan Telmo
0.95Goals scored / game0.8
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo
1.19Goals allowed / game1.05
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo
49%Average possession50%
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo
3.29Shots on target / game3.15
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.57Shots per game9.65
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo
3.29Shots on target3.15
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo
8.2%Shot conversion8.3%
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo
49%Possession50%
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo
1.41xG for1.31
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo
1.22xG against1.55
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo

Shooting quality

Racing Córdoba: BalancedSan Telmo: Balanced
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo
Accuracy (shots on target)28%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.25

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Racing Córdoba is 40% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / game - Racing Córdoba · 1 pts / game - San Telmo

Racing Córdoba
WLDWL
Season result split
29% W29% R43% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-6-9
1.14 pts / game · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-3-2
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
DLDWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.42Opponent xG: 1.05BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
San Telmo
DDWLL
Season result split
20% W40% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-8-8
1.00 pts / game · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-6-3
Last 5 away
0-3-2
DDLDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.23Opponent xG: 1.69BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Racing Córdoba is 19% better for: goals scored per game.

0.95 goals / game - Racing Córdoba · 0.8 goals / game - San Telmo

San Telmo is 13% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.19 goals / game - Racing Córdoba · 1.05 goals / game - San Telmo

Racing Córdoba scoring profile: mixed

Racing Córdoba scores in 57% of games (12 of 21 meczów), while San Telmo keeps a clean sheet in 40% (8 of 20 meczów).

San Telmo scoring profile: mixed

San Telmo scores in 50% of games (10 of 20 meczów), while Racing Córdoba keeps a clean sheet in 29% (6 of 21 meczów).

20Goals scored (season)16
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo
25Goals conceded (season)21
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo
2.14Average goals per game1.85
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo
6Goals scored (last 5)4
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo
6Goals conceded (last 5)5
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo

How often they score at least...

57%1 goal50%
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo
29%2 goals25%
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo
10%3 goals5%
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo
0%4 goals0%
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal60%
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo
43%2 goals30%
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo
5%3 goals15%
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo
0%4 goals0%
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

39%
League average

Goal patterns

10%BTTS at half-time15%
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo
5%BTTS in both halves0%
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo
14%Scored in both halves10%
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo
40%BTTS - last 540%
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

57%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo
24%Min. 2 goals before half-time35%
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time60%
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo
43%Min. 2 goals after half-time10%
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time5%
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Racing Córdoba - half-time state
19% leading52% draw29% trailing
San Telmo - half-time state
20% leading50% draw30% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.1Points per game (1st half)1.1
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo
0.33Goals scored (1st half)0.45
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo
0.48Goals conceded (1st half)0.65
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo
0.81Average goals (1st half)1.1
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo
62%Clean sheet before half-time55%
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo
71%No goal before half-time70%
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo

After half-time (2nd half)

1.05Points per game (2nd half)1.2
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo
0.62Goals scored (2nd half)0.35
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo
0.71Goals conceded (2nd half)0.4
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo
1.33Average goals (2nd half)0.75
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo
48%Clean sheet after half-time60%
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo
57%No goal after half-time70%
Racing CórdobaSan Telmo

Racing Córdoba - second-half results

19% W48% R33% P
23
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.10
PPG before half-time
Lead holding153%

Leads at halftime in 19% of games and wins 29%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

San Telmo - second-half results

25% W45% R30% P
22
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.10
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 20%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.3

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Racing Córdoba - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.20
Goals scored / game0.40.8
Goals allowed / game0.40.8
Average goals per game0.81.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
San Telmo - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.40
Goals scored / game0.40.4
Goals allowed / game0.80.2
Average goals per game1.20.6
1 goal60%40%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-2+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Racing Córdoba
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
3
7
16-30
2
1
31-45
5
4
46-60
3
7
61-75
5
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

San Telmo
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
3
4
16-30
2
7
31-45
4
1
46-60
2
2
61-75
1
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.00
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.0 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
39%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
0%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
28%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
22%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Racing Córdoba

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.43
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.46
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
83%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
161%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.26
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

San Telmo

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.51
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.50
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
108%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
92%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
6% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
6%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Prim B Nacional).

Teams vs league

Racing CórdobaLigaSan Telmo
Average goals per game 2.141.88 1.85
Both teams scored 43%39% 35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 43%31% 30%
Clean sheets 29%39% 40%
Goal before half-time 57%56% 60%
Goal after half-time 71%69% 60%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.88
Average goals per game
39%
Both teams scored
31%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.14
Home goals / game
0.74
Away goals / game
+54%
Home attack advantage
+35%
Home defensive advantage
+24%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
26%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. San TelmoYellow cardLeonel Pollacchi
  2. San TelmoSubstitutionOn: Renzo Sebastián UriburuOff: Leonel Pollacchi
  3. San TelmoSubstitutionOn: Juan Cruz ZurbriggenOff: Facundo Héctor Báez
  4. Racing CórdobaSubstitutionOn: Santiago Tomás RinaudoOff: Matías Machado
  5. San TelmoSubstitutionOn: Iñaki LartirigoyenOff: Nicolás Molina
  6. Racing CórdobaGoalPablo Alejandro ChavarríaAssist: Raúl Chamorro

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Racing Córdoba's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against San Telmo. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Racing Córdoba vs San Telmo?

The Prim B Nacional match finished Racing Córdoba 2:1 San Telmo. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Racing Córdoba vs San Telmo?

Racing Córdoba score 0.95 goals per game on average and San Telmo 0.80. The Prim B Nacional average is 1.88 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 31% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Racing Córdoba's matches and 35% of San Telmo's.

What form are Racing Córdoba and San Telmo in?

Over the last 5 games Racing Córdoba have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and San Telmo 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Racing Córdoba vs San Telmo?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Racing Córdoba vs San Telmo: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.