Racing Santander vs Burgos CF: match statistics
Racing Santander displays significantly better home form with a 62% win rate at home and an impressive goal difference of 2.31 scored versus 1.23 conceded per match. The hosts occupy a high 2nd place in the table and have never failed to score at their own stadium (0% FTS%). Burgos CF struggles in away matches, where as many as 42% of games end in defeat, and the team fails to score in 42% of away matches. The xG statistics also favor Racing (1.85 vs 1.05), indicating a clear qualitative advantage for the hosts in attack. Although Burgos can play effectively (42% away wins), Racing Santander's dominance in every aspect of home play and the visitors' weaker scoring efficiency suggest a home victory, although a draw remains a realistic option due to the defensive solidity of both teams.
Racing Santander vs Burgos CF: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Racing Santander played against Burgos CF in Segunda División (Spain). The game was played on February 22, 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
Racing Santander has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Burgos CF has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Racing Santander scores 2.00 goals per game and allows 1.35. Burgos CF scores 1.12 and allows 0.96. Games in this league average 2.53 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 73% of Racing Santander's games and 46% of Burgos CF's. The Over 2.5 rates are 69% and 38%, compared with league averages of 56% for BTTS and 49% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Racing Santander has the higher season xG average, 1.55 to 1.18 per game. Racing Santander takes 13.7 shots per game, while Burgos CF takes 10.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Racing Santander leads at halftime in 35% of its games and scores 1.31 goals per game after halftime. Burgos CF leads at halftime in 19% and scores 0.62 after halftime.
When the teams score
Racing Santander's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (13 goals). For Burgos CF, it is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Segunda División games average 2.53 goals. Both teams score in 56% of games, and 49% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Racing Santander displays significantly better home form with a 62% win rate at home and an impressive goal difference of 2.31 scored versus 1.23 conceded per match. The hosts occupy a high 2nd place in the table and have never failed to score at their own stadium (0% FTS%). Burgos CF struggles in away matches, where as many as 42% of games end in defeat, and the team fails to score in 42% of away matches. The xG statistics also favor Racing (1.85 vs 1.05), indicating a clear qualitative advantage for the hosts in attack. Although Burgos can play effectively (42% away wins), Racing Santander's dominance in every aspect of home play and the visitors' weaker scoring efficiency suggest a home victory, although a draw remains a realistic option due to the defensive solidity of both teams.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Racing Santander | Burgos CF | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.38 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Racing Santander is 13% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / game - Racing Santander · 1.6 pts / game - Burgos CF
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Racing Santander is 79% better for: goals scored per game.
2 goals / game - Racing Santander · 1.12 goals / game - Burgos CF
Burgos CF is 41% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.35 goals / game - Racing Santander · 0.96 goals / game - Burgos CF
Racing Santander scores in 96% of games (25 of 26 meczów), while Burgos CF keeps a clean sheet in 31% (8 of 26 meczów).
Burgos CF scores in 62% of games (16 of 26 meczów), while Racing Santander keeps a clean sheet in 23% (6 of 26 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Racing Santander
Over / Under - Burgos CF
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Racing Santander is 23% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.42 pts / game - Racing Santander · 1.15 pts / game - Burgos CF
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Racing Santander - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 35% of games and wins 54%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Burgos CF - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 19% of games and wins 42%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (13 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Racing Santander
Burgos CF
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Segunda División).
Teams vs league
| Racing Santander | Liga | Burgos CF | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.35 | 2.53 | ▼ 2.08 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 73% | 56% | ▼ 46% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 69% | 49% | ▼ 38% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 23% | 27% | ▲ 31% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 69% | 67% | ▼ 54% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 88% | 75% | ▼ 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Racing Santander's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Burgos CF. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Racing Santander vs Burgos CF?
The Segunda División match finished Racing Santander 1:0 Burgos CF. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Racing Santander vs Burgos CF?
Racing Santander score 2.00 goals per game on average and Burgos CF 1.12. The Segunda División average is 2.53 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 73% of Racing Santander's matches and 46% of Burgos CF's.
What form are Racing Santander and Burgos CF in?
Over the last 5 games Racing Santander have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Burgos CF 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Racing Santander vs Burgos CF?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.