Racing vs Al Ansar: match statistics
Al Ansar is the clear favorite in this match, sitting top of the table with an impressive record of 10 wins, 2 draws, and just 1 defeat. The visiting side boasts excellent away form with a 67% win rate and 50% clean sheets, scoring an average of 2 goals per away game while conceding just 0.5. Racing is rooted to the bottom in 12th place, without a single win this season, having lost all 7 of their home matches. At home, they average a mere 0.43 goals scored and concede 3 goals per game. The stark contrast in goal difference (-18 for the hosts vs. +9 for the visitors), coupled with Al Ansar's huge superiority in both offensive and defensive metrics (xG 1.3 vs. 0.6, possession 56% vs. 47%), clearly points towards an away victory. The recent form of both teams over the last 5 matches (0 points per game for Racing vs. 2 points per game for Al Ansar) further confirms this prediction.
Racing vs Al Ansar: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Racing played against Al Ansar in Lebanese Premier League (Lebanon). The game was played on February 8, 2026. Final score: 0:6.
Recent form
Racing has 0 wins, 0 draws and 5 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.00 points per game. Al Ansar has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Racing scores 0.31 goals per game and allows 2.85. Al Ansar scores 2.00 and allows 0.46. Games in this league average 2.16 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 31% of Racing's games and 38% of Al Ansar's. The Over 2.5 rates are 54% and 31%, compared with league averages of 30% for BTTS and 38% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Al Ansar has the higher season xG average, 1.53 to 0.62 per game. Racing takes 3.1 shots per game, while Al Ansar takes 9.9.
First-half and second-half trends
Racing leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 0.23 goals per game after halftime. Al Ansar leads at halftime in 46% and scores 1.15 after halftime.
When the teams score
Racing's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (2 goals). For Al Ansar, it is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Lebanese Premier League games average 2.16 goals. Both teams score in 30% of games, and 38% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Al Ansar is the clear favorite in this match, sitting top of the table with an impressive record of 10 wins, 2 draws, and just 1 defeat. The visiting side boasts excellent away form with a 67% win rate and 50% clean sheets, scoring an average of 2 goals per away game while conceding just 0.5. Racing is rooted to the bottom in 12th place, without a single win this season, having lost all 7 of their home matches. At home, they average a mere 0.43 goals scored and concede 3 goals per game. The stark contrast in goal difference (-18 for the hosts vs. +9 for the visitors), coupled with Al Ansar's huge superiority in both offensive and defensive metrics (xG 1.3 vs. 0.6, possession 56% vs. 47%), clearly points towards an away victory. The recent form of both teams over the last 5 matches (0 points per game for Racing vs. 2 points per game for Al Ansar) further confirms this prediction.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Racing | Al Ansar | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 44% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.20 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.46 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Al Ansar is 545% better for: goals scored per game.
0.31 goals / game - Racing · 2 goals / game - Al Ansar
Al Ansar is 520% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.85 goals / game - Racing · 0.46 goals / game - Al Ansar
Racing scores in 31% of games (4 of 13 meczów), while Al Ansar keeps a clean sheet in 62% (8 of 13 meczów).
Al Ansar scores in 92% of games (12 of 13 meczów), while Racing keeps a clean sheet in 8% (1 of 13 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Racing
Over / Under - Al Ansar
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Al Ansar is 735% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.23 pts / game - Racing · 1.92 pts / game - Al Ansar
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Racing - second-half results
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Al Ansar - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 46% of games and wins 77%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.20 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.60 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +6 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Racing
Al Ansar
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Lebanese Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Racing | Liga | Al Ansar | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.15 | 2.16 | ▲ 2.46 |
| Both teams scored | • 31% | 30% | ▲ 38% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 54% | 38% | ▼ 31% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 8% | 43% | ▲ 62% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 77% | 55% | • 54% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 77% | 73% | ▲ 85% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Al AnsarGoalHicham Houssem Eddine KhalfallahAssist: Ahmad Khairdien
- Al AnsarGoalNader MatarAssist: Majed Othman
- Al AnsarGoalAli TneshAssist: Majed Othman
- Al AnsarGoalMohammad Bou SalehAssist: Ali Tnesh
- Al AnsarGoalAli TneshAssist: Majed Othman
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Racing's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Al Ansar. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Racing vs Al Ansar?
The Lebanese Premier League match finished Racing 0:6 Al Ansar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Racing vs Al Ansar?
Racing score 0.31 goals per game on average and Al Ansar 2.00. The Lebanese Premier League average is 2.16 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 31% of Racing's matches and 38% of Al Ansar's.
What form are Racing and Al Ansar in?
Over the last 5 games Racing have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and Al Ansar 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Racing vs Al Ansar?
The statistical background for Racing vs Al Ansar — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.