Racing vs Al Hikma: match statistics
Racing presents catastrophic form, having lost all 11 matches of the season, including the last 5 in a row, conceding an average of 3.4 goals per match at home. The hosts have not won a single encounter this season, holding a 100% loss record in home matches and a goal difference of -14. Al Hikma, despite average away form (17% wins, 50% losses), demonstrates significantly better defensive stability, conceding an average of only 1.17 goals away and maintaining 50% clean sheets. The difference in quality between the teams is distinct—Racing scores an average of merely 0.6 goals at home with an xG of 0.71, while Al Hikma has a better conversion rate (13% vs 11%) and higher xG (0.85). Given the dramatic weakness of the hosts and the relative solidity of the visitors in defense, a victory for Al Hikma is the most likely scenario, although a draw also remains a viable option.
Racing vs Al Hikma: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Racing played against Al Hikma in Lebanese Premier League (Lebanon). The game was played on January 23, 2026. Final score: 0:2.
Recent form
Racing has 0 wins, 0 draws and 5 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.00 points per game. Al Hikma has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses, with 0.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Racing scores 0.36 goals per game and allows 3.00. Al Hikma scores 1.09 and allows 1.27. Games in this league average 2.32 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 36% of Racing's games and 36% of Al Hikma's. The Over 2.5 rates are 64% and 55%, compared with league averages of 32% for BTTS and 42% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Al Hikma has the higher season xG average, 0.97 to 0.68 per game. Racing takes 3.1 shots per game, while Al Hikma takes 6.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Racing leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 0.27 goals per game after halftime. Al Hikma leads at halftime in 27% and scores 0.64 after halftime.
When the teams score
Racing's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (2 goals). For Al Hikma, it is minutes 61-75 (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Lebanese Premier League games average 2.32 goals. Both teams score in 32% of games, and 42% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Racing presents catastrophic form, having lost all 11 matches of the season, including the last 5 in a row, conceding an average of 3.4 goals per match at home. The hosts have not won a single encounter this season, holding a 100% loss record in home matches and a goal difference of -14. Al Hikma, despite average away form (17% wins, 50% losses), demonstrates significantly better defensive stability, conceding an average of only 1.17 goals away and maintaining 50% clean sheets. The difference in quality between the teams is distinct—Racing scores an average of merely 0.6 goals at home with an xG of 0.71, while Al Hikma has a better conversion rate (13% vs 11%) and higher xG (0.85). Given the dramatic weakness of the hosts and the relative solidity of the visitors in defense, a victory for Al Hikma is the most likely scenario, although a draw also remains a viable option.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Racing | Al Hikma | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 47% | 49% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.22 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Al Hikma is 203% better for: goals scored per game.
0.36 goals / game - Racing · 1.09 goals / game - Al Hikma
Al Hikma is 136% better for: goals allowed per game.
3 goals / game - Racing · 1.27 goals / game - Al Hikma
Racing scores in 36% of games (4 of 11 meczów), while Al Hikma keeps a clean sheet in 55% (6 of 11 meczów).
Al Hikma scores in 73% of games (8 of 11 meczów), while Racing keeps a clean sheet in 9% (1 of 11 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Racing
Over / Under - Al Hikma
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Al Hikma is 506% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.18 pts / game - Racing · 1.09 pts / game - Al Hikma
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Racing - second-half results
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Al Hikma - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 27% of games and wins 36%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.00 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.8 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -8 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.20 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Racing
Al Hikma
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Lebanese Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Racing | Liga | Al Hikma | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.36 | 2.32 | • 2.36 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 36% | 32% | ▲ 36% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 64% | 42% | ▲ 55% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 9% | 41% | ▲ 55% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 82% | 56% | ▲ 73% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 82% | 77% | ▼ 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Record from Racing's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Al Hikma. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Racing vs Al Hikma?
The Lebanese Premier League match finished Racing 0:2 Al Hikma. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Racing vs Al Hikma?
Racing score 0.36 goals per game on average and Al Hikma 1.09. The Lebanese Premier League average is 2.32 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 36% of Racing's matches and 36% of Al Hikma's.
What form are Racing and Al Hikma in?
Over the last 5 games Racing have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and Al Hikma 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Racing vs Al Hikma?
The statistical background for Racing vs Al Hikma — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.