Lebanon - Lebanese Premier LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Racing vs Al Hikma: match statistics

Racing crest
Racing
0 : 2half-time 0:2
Al Hikma crest
Al Hikma
120%(0.00)
X30%(0.00)
250%(0.00)

Racing presents catastrophic form, having lost all 11 matches of the season, including the last 5 in a row, conceding an average of 3.4 goals per match at home. The hosts have not won a single encounter this season, holding a 100% loss record in home matches and a goal difference of -14. Al Hikma, despite average away form (17% wins, 50% losses), demonstrates significantly better defensive stability, conceding an average of only 1.17 goals away and maintaining 50% clean sheets. The difference in quality between the teams is distinct—Racing scores an average of merely 0.6 goals at home with an xG of 0.71, while Al Hikma has a better conversion rate (13% vs 11%) and higher xG (0.85). Given the dramatic weakness of the hosts and the relative solidity of the visitors in defense, a victory for Al Hikma is the most likely scenario, although a draw also remains a viable option.

Racing vs Al Hikma: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Racing play Al Hikma in Lebanese Premier League (Lebanon). The match date is 23 January 2026 at 13:15. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Racing: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match. Al Hikma: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Racing scores 0.22 and concedes 2.91 goals per match. Al Hikma scores 1.30 and concedes 1.30. League average: 2.44 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Racing 22%, Al Hikma 43%. Over 2.5: Racing 52%, Al Hikma 52%. League level: BTTS 33%, Over 2.5 43%.

xG, shots and style

Al Hikma has higher xG: 1.05 vs 0.64. Racing: 3.7 shots per match, Al Hikma: 5.8.

Match halves

Racing: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.13. Al Hikma: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.57.

Goals by minute

Racing: 76-90+ (2 goals). Al Hikma: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Lebanese Premier League: 2.44 goals per match, BTTS 33%, Over 2.5 43%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Racing presents catastrophic form, having lost all 11 matches of the season, including the last 5 in a row, conceding an average of 3.4 goals per match at home. The hosts have not won a single encounter this season, holding a 100% loss record in home matches and a goal difference of -14. Al Hikma, despite average away form (17% wins, 50% losses), demonstrates significantly better defensive stability, conceding an average of only 1.17 goals away and maintaining 50% clean sheets. The difference in quality between the teams is distinct—Racing scores an average of merely 0.6 goals at home with an xG of 0.71, while Al Hikma has a better conversion rate (13% vs 11%) and higher xG (0.85). Given the dramatic weakness of the hosts and the relative solidity of the visitors in defense, a victory for Al Hikma is the most likely scenario, although a draw also remains a viable option.

Half-by-half

0 : 2
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

45Possession (%)55
RacingAl Hikma
2Shots16
RacingAl Hikma
0Shots on target7
RacingAl Hikma
0.32xG1.88
RacingAl Hikma
1Corners4
RacingAl Hikma
25Dangerous attacks53
RacingAl Hikma
16Fouls18
RacingAl Hikma
0Cards0
RacingAl Hikma

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.22Goals scored / match1.3
RacingAl Hikma
2.91Goals conceded / match1.3
RacingAl Hikma
40%Average possession45%
RacingAl Hikma
1.43Shots on target / match3.3
RacingAl Hikma

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

3.74Shots per match5.78
RacingAl Hikma
1.43Shots on target3.3
RacingAl Hikma
5.8%Shot conversion22.6%
RacingAl Hikma
40%Possession45%
RacingAl Hikma
0.64xG for1.05
RacingAl Hikma
1.74xG against0.99
RacingAl Hikma

Shooting quality

Racing: BalancedAl Hikma: Counter-attacking
RacingAl Hikma
Accuracy (shots on target)38%57%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.170.18
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.150.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Racing
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W4% R96% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-22
0.04 pts / match · goal difference -62
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-10
Last 5 at home
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 0.69Opponent xG: 1.88BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%
Al Hikma
LDWWL
Season result split
39% W13% R48% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-3-11
1.30 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-2-7
Last 5 away
1-0-4
LLLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.08Opponent xG: 0.83BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Al Hikma is 491% better for: goals scored per match.

0.22 goals / match - Racing · 1.3 goals / match - Al Hikma

Al Hikma is 124% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.91 goals / match - Racing · 1.3 goals / match - Al Hikma

Racing scoring profile: more difficult

Racing scores in 22% of matches (5 of 23 matches), while Al Hikma keeps a clean sheet in 35% (8 of 23 matches).

Al Hikma scoring profile: very strong

Al Hikma scores in 70% of matches (16 of 23 matches), while Racing keeps a clean sheet in 4% (1 of 23 matches).

5Goals scored (season)30
RacingAl Hikma
67Goals conceded (season)30
RacingAl Hikma
3.13Average goals in match2.61
RacingAl Hikma
1Goals scored (last 5)11
RacingAl Hikma
15Goals conceded (last 5)8
RacingAl Hikma

How often they score at least...

22%1 goal70%
RacingAl Hikma
0%2 goals35%
RacingAl Hikma
0%3 goals17%
RacingAl Hikma
0%4 goals9%
RacingAl Hikma

How often they concede at least...

96%1 goal65%
RacingAl Hikma
83%2 goals43%
RacingAl Hikma
48%3 goals17%
RacingAl Hikma
30%4 goals4%
RacingAl Hikma

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

9%BTTS at half-time26%
RacingAl Hikma
0%BTTS in both halves4%
RacingAl Hikma
0%Scored in both halves17%
RacingAl Hikma

BTTS and goal count

22%Min. 3 goals and BTTS43%
RacingAl Hikma
30%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
RacingAl Hikma
20%BTTS - last 560%
RacingAl Hikma

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

78%Min. 1 goal before half-time65%
RacingAl Hikma
35%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
RacingAl Hikma
22%Min. 3 goals before half-time26%
RacingAl Hikma

2nd half

87%Min. 1 goal after half-time70%
RacingAl Hikma
52%Min. 2 goals after half-time30%
RacingAl Hikma
26%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
RacingAl Hikma

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Al Hikma is 491% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.22 pts / match - Racing · 1.3 pts / match - Al Hikma

Racing - half-time state
0% leading22% draw78% trailing
Al Hikma - half-time state
30% leading39% draw30% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.22Points per match (1st half)1.3
RacingAl Hikma
0.09Goals scored (1st half)0.74
RacingAl Hikma
1.35Goals conceded (1st half)0.61
RacingAl Hikma
1.43Average goals (1st half)1.35
RacingAl Hikma
22%Clean sheet before half-time57%
RacingAl Hikma
91%No goal before half-time52%
RacingAl Hikma

After half-time (2nd half)

0.17Points per match (2nd half)1.04
RacingAl Hikma
0.13Goals scored (2nd half)0.57
RacingAl Hikma
1.57Goals conceded (2nd half)0.7
RacingAl Hikma
1.7Average goals (2nd half)1.26
RacingAl Hikma
13%Clean sheet after half-time48%
RacingAl Hikma
87%No goal after half-time61%
RacingAl Hikma

Racing - second-half results

0% W17% R83% P
5
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-29
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
-33
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.22
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Al Hikma - second-half results

22% W39% R39% P
30
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.30
PPG before half-time
Lead holding130%

Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Racing - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.200.00
Goals scored / match0.20.0
Goals conceded / match1.21.8
Average goals in match1.41.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet20%0%
No goal80%100%
Goal difference-5-9
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 0% draw - 100% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Al Hikma - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match1.21.0
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.82.0
1 goal40%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+30
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Racing
ScoredConceded
0
6
0-15
1
9
16-30
1
16
31-45
0
12
46-60
1
13
61-75
2
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.

Al Hikma
ScoredConceded
3
5
0-15
6
3
16-30
8
6
31-45
4
3
46-60
6
6
61-75
3
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.87
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 2.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
117%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
33%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-30%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
15%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
23%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Racing

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-1.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.59
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.42
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-1.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
16%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
265%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
40% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
40%

Al Hikma

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.31
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
118%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
97%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
10% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
10%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Lebanese Premier League).

Teams vs league

RacingLigaAl Hikma
Average goals in match 3.132.44 2.61
Both teams scored 22%33% 43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 52%43% 52%
Clean sheets 4%39% 35%
Goal before half-time 78%57% 65%
Goal after half-time 87%77% 70%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.44
Average goals per match
33%
Both teams scored
43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.34
Home goals / match
1.10
Away goals / match
+22%
Home attack advantage
+18%
Home defence advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
57%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Racing 0 - 0 - 1 Al Hikma. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Al Hikma
2 : 0
Racing

FAQ

What was the result of Racing vs Al Hikma?

The Lebanese Premier League match finished Racing 0:2 Al Hikma. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Racing vs Al Hikma?

Racing score 0.22 goals per game on average and Al Hikma 1.30. The Lebanese Premier League average is 2.44 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 43% of games. Both teams score in 22% of Racing's matches and 43% of Al Hikma's.

What form are Racing and Al Hikma in?

Over the last 5 games Racing have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and Al Hikma 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Racing vs Al Hikma?

The statistical background for Racing vs Al Hikma — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.