Uruguay - Primera DivisiónParque Osvaldo RobertoData current as of 20 July 2026

Racing vs Cerro Largo: match statistics

Racing crest
Racing
1 : 0half-time 1:0
Cerro Largo crest
Cerro Largo

Racing vs Cerro Largo: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Racing play Cerro Largo in Primera División (Uruguay). The match date is 17 May 2026 at 20:00. Venue: Parque Osvaldo Roberto. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Racing: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match. Cerro Largo: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Racing scores 1.30 and concedes 0.80 goals per match. Cerro Largo scores 1.10 and concedes 1.05. League average: 2.41 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Racing 55%, Cerro Largo 35%. Over 2.5: Racing 30%, Cerro Largo 35%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 46%.

xG, shots and style

Racing has higher xG: 1.61 vs 1.24. Racing: 13.2 shots per match, Cerro Largo: 9.8.

Match halves

Racing: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.65. Cerro Largo: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.75.

Goals by minute

Racing: 61-75 (6 goals). Cerro Largo: 76-90+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Primera División: 2.41 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 46%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 1-2-0. Average goals 2.33, BTTS 67%.

Match description

I back Racing to win because at home they average 1.63 goals per match, register 5 shots on target from 13.13 attempts and have a 12% conversion rate, with home xG for of 1.63. Cerro Largo away scores only 0.88 goals per game, records 4 shots on target from 10.88 attempts and an 8% conversion, and failed to score in 50% of their away matches. Defensively, Racing concedes 1.0 goal at home on average with xG against 1.08 and a positive home goal difference of +5, whereas the visitors concede 1.25 goals on average away, have a negative away goal difference of -3 and xG against 1.71, suggesting more clear-cut chances created against them. In the last 5 matches Racing averages 1.6 points (2 wins, 2 draws, 1 loss) while Cerro Largo averages only 0.8 points (1 win, 1 draw, 3 losses), confirming the home side’s form advantage. Considering superior finishing, higher shot volume and more favorable xG metrics for the hosts, I assess Racing’s win probability at 65%, draw 20% and away win 15%.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

41Possession (%)59
RacingCerro Largo
7Shots4
RacingCerro Largo
3Shots on target0
RacingCerro Largo
1.06xG0.67
RacingCerro Largo
4Corners1
RacingCerro Largo
56Dangerous attacks56
RacingCerro Largo
19Fouls13
RacingCerro Largo
4Cards3
RacingCerro Largo

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.3Goals scored / match1.1
RacingCerro Largo
0.8Goals conceded / match1.05
RacingCerro Largo
48%Average possession50%
RacingCerro Largo
4.2Shots on target / match3.25
RacingCerro Largo

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.15Shots per match9.75
RacingCerro Largo
4.2Shots on target3.25
RacingCerro Largo
9.9%Shot conversion11.3%
RacingCerro Largo
48%Possession50%
RacingCerro Largo
1.61xG for1.24
RacingCerro Largo
1.08xG against1.52
RacingCerro Largo

Shooting quality

Racing: BalancedCerro Largo: Balanced
RacingCerro Largo
Accuracy (shots on target)32%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Cerro Largo is 14% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Racing · 1.6 pts / match - Cerro Largo

Racing
WDDDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W40% R10% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-8-2
1.90 pts / match · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-4-0
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-5-1
Last 5 at home
1-4-0
DDWDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.64Opponent xG: 0.88BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 0%
Cerro Largo
LWWDD
Season result split
35% W20% R45% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-4-9
1.25 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-2-5
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DLWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.15Opponent xG: 1.16BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Racing is 18% better for: goals scored per match.

1.3 goals / match - Racing · 1.1 goals / match - Cerro Largo

Racing is 31% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.8 goals / match - Racing · 1.05 goals / match - Cerro Largo

Racing scoring profile: very strong

Racing scores in 85% of matches (17 of 20 matches), while Cerro Largo keeps a clean sheet in 30% (6 of 20 matches).

Cerro Largo scoring profile: mixed

Cerro Largo scores in 60% of matches (12 of 20 matches), while Racing keeps a clean sheet in 40% (8 of 20 matches).

26Goals scored (season)22
RacingCerro Largo
16Goals conceded (season)21
RacingCerro Largo
2.1Average goals in match2.15
RacingCerro Largo
3Goals scored (last 5)6
RacingCerro Largo
2Goals conceded (last 5)2
RacingCerro Largo

How often they score at least...

85%1 goal60%
RacingCerro Largo
30%2 goals35%
RacingCerro Largo
10%3 goals15%
RacingCerro Largo
5%4 goals0%
RacingCerro Largo

How often they concede at least...

60%1 goal70%
RacingCerro Largo
10%2 goals25%
RacingCerro Largo
5%3 goals10%
RacingCerro Largo
5%4 goals0%
RacingCerro Largo

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

52%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time10%
RacingCerro Largo
5%BTTS in both halves5%
RacingCerro Largo
20%Scored in both halves20%
RacingCerro Largo

BTTS and goal count

25%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
RacingCerro Largo
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
RacingCerro Largo
40%BTTS - last 520%
RacingCerro Largo

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

65%Min. 1 goal before half-time65%
RacingCerro Largo
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time15%
RacingCerro Largo
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
RacingCerro Largo

2nd half

65%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
RacingCerro Largo
35%Min. 2 goals after half-time35%
RacingCerro Largo
10%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
RacingCerro Largo

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Racing is 42% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.7 pts / match - Racing · 1.2 pts / match - Cerro Largo

Racing - half-time state
40% leading50% draw10% trailing
Cerro Largo - half-time state
25% leading45% draw30% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.7Points per match (1st half)1.2
RacingCerro Largo
0.65Goals scored (1st half)0.35
RacingCerro Largo
0.35Goals conceded (1st half)0.45
RacingCerro Largo
1Average goals (1st half)0.8
RacingCerro Largo
70%Clean sheet before half-time60%
RacingCerro Largo
40%No goal before half-time65%
RacingCerro Largo

After half-time (2nd half)

1.35Points per match (2nd half)1.35
RacingCerro Largo
0.65Goals scored (2nd half)0.75
RacingCerro Largo
0.45Goals conceded (2nd half)0.6
RacingCerro Largo
1.1Average goals (2nd half)1.35
RacingCerro Largo
65%Clean sheet after half-time55%
RacingCerro Largo
55%No goal after half-time55%
RacingCerro Largo

Racing - second-half results

30% W45% R25% P
34
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.70
PPG before half-time
Lead holding125%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Cerro Largo - second-half results

35% W30% R35% P
24
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding140%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Racing - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.80
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.00.4
Average goals in match0.40.6
1 goal40%40%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+2-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Cerro Largo - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.80
Goals scored / match0.21.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.0
Average goals in match0.61.0
1 goal40%40%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%100%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-1+5
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Racing
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
5
3
16-30
5
2
31-45
1
1
46-60
6
3
61-75
6
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Cerro Largo
ScoredConceded
1
5
0-15
4
2
16-30
2
2
31-45
4
3
46-60
1
4
61-75
10
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.13
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
88%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
45%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+10%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
51%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Racing

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.53
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
98%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
74%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.50
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Cerro Largo

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.28
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.33
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.47
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
102%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
79%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.35
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
45% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
45%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).

Teams vs league

RacingLigaCerro Largo
Average goals in match 2.102.41 2.15
Both teams scored 55%52% 35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 30%46% 35%
Clean sheets 40%27% 30%
Goal before half-time 65%69% 65%
Goal after half-time 65%73% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.41
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.33
Home goals / match
1.08
Away goals / match
+23%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Racing 1 - 2 - 0 Cerro Largo. Average goals 2.33, both teams scored in 67% matches.

Cerro Largo Fútbol Club
0 : 1
Racing Club de Montevideo
Cerro Largo Fútbol Club
2 : 2
Racing Club de Montevideo
Racing Club de Montevideo
1 : 1
Cerro Largo Fútbol Club

FAQ

What was the result of Racing vs Cerro Largo?

The Primera División match finished Racing 1:0 Cerro Largo. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Racing and Cerro Largo?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Racing won 1, Cerro Largo won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Racing vs Cerro Largo?

Racing score 1.30 goals per game on average and Cerro Largo 1.10. The Primera División average is 2.41 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 55% of Racing's matches and 35% of Cerro Largo's.

What form are Racing and Cerro Largo in?

Over the last 5 games Racing have a 1-4-0 record (1.40 points per game) and Cerro Largo 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Racing vs Cerro Largo?

The statistical background for Racing vs Cerro Largo — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.