Radnički Kragujevac vs Čukarički: match statistics
Radnički Kragujevac vs Čukarički: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Radnički Kragujevac played against Čukarički in SuperLiga (Serbia). The game was played on December 17, 2025. Final score: 3:2.
Recent form
Radnički Kragujevac has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Čukarički has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Radnički Kragujevac scores 1.11 goals per game and allows 1.39. Čukarički scores 1.44 and allows 1.39. Games in this league average 2.76 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 56% of Radnički Kragujevac's games and 78% of Čukarički's. The Over 2.5 rates are 39% and 50%, compared with league averages of 56% for BTTS and 48% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Radnički Kragujevac has the higher season xG average, 1.90 to 1.59 per game. Radnički Kragujevac takes 16.2 shots per game, while Čukarički takes 13.7.
First-half and second-half trends
Radnički Kragujevac leads at halftime in 44% of its games and scores 0.50 goals per game after halftime. Čukarički leads at halftime in 56% and scores 0.61 after halftime.
When the teams score
Radnički Kragujevac's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (5 goals). For Čukarički, it is minutes 16-30 (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
SuperLiga games average 2.76 goals. Both teams score in 56% of games, and 48% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Radnički Kragujevac | Čukarički | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.21 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Čukarički is 20% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - Radnički Kragujevac · 1.2 pts / game - Čukarički
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Čukarički is 30% better for: goals scored per game.
1.11 goals / game - Radnički Kragujevac · 1.44 goals / game - Čukarički
Radnički Kragujevac scores in 72% of games (13 of 18 meczów), while Čukarički keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 18 meczów).
Čukarički scores in 89% of games (16 of 18 meczów), while Radnički Kragujevac keeps a clean sheet in 28% (5 of 18 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Radnički Kragujevac
Over / Under - Čukarički
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Čukarički is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.61 pts / game - Radnički Kragujevac · 1.83 pts / game - Čukarički
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Radnički Kragujevac - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 44% of games and wins 28%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Čukarički - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 56% of games and wins 39%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Radnički Kragujevac
Čukarički
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (SuperLiga).
Teams vs league
| Radnički Kragujevac | Liga | Čukarički | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.50 | 2.76 | • 2.83 |
| Both teams scored | • 56% | 56% | ▲ 78% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 39% | 48% | ▲ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 28% | 25% | ▼ 11% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 78% | 72% | ▲ 89% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 83% | 77% | ▲ 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of Radnički Kragujevac vs Čukarički?
The SuperLiga match finished Radnički Kragujevac 3:2 Čukarički. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Radnički Kragujevac vs Čukarički?
Radnički Kragujevac score 1.11 goals per game on average and Čukarički 1.44. The SuperLiga average is 2.76 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Radnički Kragujevac's matches and 78% of Čukarički's.
What form are Radnički Kragujevac and Čukarički in?
Over the last 5 games Radnički Kragujevac have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Čukarički 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Radnički Kragujevac vs Čukarički?
The statistical background for Radnički Kragujevac vs Čukarički — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.