Radnički Niš vs Čukarički: match statistics
Radnički Niš vs Čukarički: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Radnički Niš played against Čukarički in SuperLiga (Serbia). The game was played on December 8, 2025. Final score: 1:2.
Recent form
Radnički Niš has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Čukarički has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Radnički Niš scores 1.18 goals per game and allows 1.41. Čukarički scores 1.44 and allows 1.44. Games in this league average 2.84 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 53% of Radnički Niš's games and 75% of Čukarički's. The Over 2.5 rates are 53% and 50%, compared with league averages of 57% for BTTS and 49% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Radnički Niš has the higher season xG average, 1.61 to 1.58 per game. Radnički Niš takes 14.1 shots per game, while Čukarički takes 13.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Radnički Niš leads at halftime in 29% of its games and scores 0.53 goals per game after halftime. Čukarički leads at halftime in 56% and scores 0.63 after halftime.
When the teams score
Radnički Niš's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). For Čukarički, it is minutes 16-30 (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
SuperLiga games average 2.84 goals. Both teams score in 57% of games, and 49% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Radnički Niš | Čukarički | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.26 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Čukarički is 22% better for: goals scored per game.
1.18 goals / game - Radnički Niš · 1.44 goals / game - Čukarički
Radnički Niš scores in 65% of games (11 of 17 meczów), while Čukarički keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 16 meczów).
Čukarički scores in 88% of games (14 of 16 meczów), while Radnički Niš keeps a clean sheet in 18% (3 of 17 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Radnički Niš
Over / Under - Čukarički
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Čukarički is 40% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.29 pts / game - Radnički Niš · 1.81 pts / game - Čukarički
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Radnički Niš - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 24%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Čukarički - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 56% of games and wins 38%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Radnički Niš
Čukarički
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (SuperLiga).
Teams vs league
| Radnički Niš | Liga | Čukarički | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.59 | 2.84 | • 2.88 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 53% | 57% | ▲ 75% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 53% | 49% | • 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 18% | 24% | ▼ 13% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 71% | 73% | ▲ 88% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 82% | 78% | ▲ 81% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Radnički Niš's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Čukarički. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Radnički Niš vs Čukarički?
The SuperLiga match finished Radnički Niš 1:2 Čukarički. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Radnički Niš vs Čukarički?
Radnički Niš score 1.18 goals per game on average and Čukarički 1.44. The SuperLiga average is 2.84 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Radnički Niš's matches and 75% of Čukarički's.
What form are Radnički Niš and Čukarički in?
Over the last 5 games Radnički Niš have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Čukarički 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Radnički Niš vs Čukarički?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Radnički Niš vs Čukarički: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.