Radnički Niš vs IMT Novi Beograd: match statistics
Radnički Niš displays decidedly better home form with 45% wins and an impressive goal difference of +6 at their own stadium. The hosts have averaged 2.0 PPG in their last five matches, winning three of them. IMT Novi Beograd struggles significantly on the road – registering only 18% wins, 64% losses, and a catastrophic goal difference of -15, without keeping a single clean sheet. The visitors concede an average of 2.36 goals per away match, which, combined with the hosts' efficiency (1.73 goals average at home), gives Radnički a real chance of victory. The disparity between Radnički's home quality and IMT's away performance favors the hosts, although IMT's experience in difficult matches could lead to a draw.
Radnički Niš vs IMT Novi Beograd: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Radnički Niš played against IMT Novi Beograd in SuperLiga (Serbia). The game was played on February 22, 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Radnički Niš has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. IMT Novi Beograd has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Radnički Niš scores 1.22 goals per game and allows 1.30. IMT Novi Beograd scores 1.13 and allows 1.78. Games in this league average 2.74 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 52% of Radnički Niš's games and 61% of IMT Novi Beograd's. The Over 2.5 rates are 52% and 43%, compared with league averages of 53% for BTTS and 50% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
IMT Novi Beograd has the higher season xG average, 1.50 to 1.47 per game. Radnički Niš takes 12.6 shots per game, while IMT Novi Beograd takes 12.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Radnički Niš leads at halftime in 26% of its games and scores 0.57 goals per game after halftime. IMT Novi Beograd leads at halftime in 13% and scores 0.83 after halftime.
When the teams score
Radnički Niš's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (6 goals). For IMT Novi Beograd, it is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
SuperLiga games average 2.74 goals. Both teams score in 53% of games, and 50% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Radnički Niš displays decidedly better home form with 45% wins and an impressive goal difference of +6 at their own stadium. The hosts have averaged 2.0 PPG in their last five matches, winning three of them. IMT Novi Beograd struggles significantly on the road – registering only 18% wins, 64% losses, and a catastrophic goal difference of -15, without keeping a single clean sheet. The visitors concede an average of 2.36 goals per away match, which, combined with the hosts' efficiency (1.73 goals average at home), gives Radnički a real chance of victory. The disparity between Radnički's home quality and IMT's away performance favors the hosts, although IMT's experience in difficult matches could lead to a draw.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Radnički Niš | IMT Novi Beograd | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Radnički Niš is 11% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Radnički Niš · 1.8 pts / game - IMT Novi Beograd
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Radnički Niš is 8% better for: goals scored per game.
1.22 goals / game - Radnički Niš · 1.13 goals / game - IMT Novi Beograd
Radnički Niš is 37% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.3 goals / game - Radnički Niš · 1.78 goals / game - IMT Novi Beograd
Radnički Niš scores in 65% of games (15 of 23 meczów), while IMT Novi Beograd keeps a clean sheet in 26% (6 of 23 meczów).
IMT Novi Beograd scores in 87% of games (20 of 23 meczów), while Radnički Niš keeps a clean sheet in 22% (5 of 23 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Radnički Niš
Over / Under - IMT Novi Beograd
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Radnički Niš is 57% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.3 pts / game - Radnički Niš · 0.83 pts / game - IMT Novi Beograd
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Radnički Niš - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 26% of games and wins 30%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
IMT Novi Beograd - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 13% of games and wins 35%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Radnički Niš
IMT Novi Beograd
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (SuperLiga).
Teams vs league
| Radnički Niš | Liga | IMT Novi Beograd | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.52 | 2.74 | ▲ 2.91 |
| Both teams scored | • 52% | 53% | ▲ 61% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 52% | 50% | ▼ 43% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 22% | 28% | ▼ 26% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 65% | 71% | ▼ 65% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 83% | 76% | ▲ 78% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Radnički Niš's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against IMT Novi Beograd. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Radnički Niš vs IMT Novi Beograd?
The SuperLiga match finished Radnički Niš 2:1 IMT Novi Beograd. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Radnički Niš vs IMT Novi Beograd?
Radnički Niš score 1.22 goals per game on average and IMT Novi Beograd 1.13. The SuperLiga average is 2.74 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 52% of Radnički Niš's matches and 61% of IMT Novi Beograd's.
What form are Radnički Niš and IMT Novi Beograd in?
Over the last 5 games Radnički Niš have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and IMT Novi Beograd 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Radnički Niš vs IMT Novi Beograd?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.