Radomlje vs Mura: match statistics
Radomlje vs Mura: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Radomlje played against Mura in PrvaLiga (Slovenia). The game was played on May 22, 2026. Venue: Športni park Radomlje. Final score: 3:2.
Recent form
Radomlje has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Mura has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Radomlje scores 1.42 goals per game and allows 1.85. Mura scores 1.00 and allows 1.58. Games in this league average 3.07 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 76% of Radomlje's games and 42% of Mura's. The Over 2.5 rates are 79% and 52%, compared with league averages of 59% for BTTS and 65% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Mura has the higher season xG average, 1.47 to 1.30 per game. Radomlje takes 9.3 shots per game, while Mura takes 11.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Radomlje leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.82 goals per game after halftime. Mura leads at halftime in 24% and scores 0.55 after halftime.
When the teams score
Radomlje's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). For Mura, it is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
PrvaLiga games average 3.07 goals. Both teams score in 59% of games, and 65% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the home win because Radomlje holds a clear advantage in finishing and goal output: 47 goals scored this season vs 33 for Mura, and an average of 1.44 goals per home match compared to Mura’s 0.81 on the road. The visitors produce slightly higher xG (1.45 away vs 1.31 for Radomlje at home) and attempt more shots (10.75 vs 8.81), but their poor conversion rate of 8% and 50% of matches without a goal limit their real attacking threat compared to the home side’s 16% conversion. Both teams are vulnerable defensively — Radomlje concedes 1.94 goals at home on average, Mura 2.00 away — which should yield an open, high-scoring game. Over the last 5 matches both teams have 2 wins and average 1.2 points per game, but the home/away split (44% wins for hosts vs 13% wins for Mura on the road) favors Radomlje.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The 'Both Teams To Score' scenario looks more likely based on three signals: league-wide BTTS occurs in 59% of matches, Radomlje had BTTS in 80% of its last 5 games, and Mura concedes an average of 2.0 goals per match this season (52 conceded), increasing the hosts’ scoring probability. Radomlje scores 1.18 goals per match this season and has a seasonal BTTS of 47%; in the last 5 matches they averaged 1.4 goals scored and 1.6 conceded, so they are offensively active and defensively vulnerable. Mura scores only 0.81 goals per match this season (33 scored) and has a seasonal BTTS of 38%, which weakens the BTTS signal, but their last 5 matches show xG rising to 1.66 and an average of 1.0 goals scored, indicating growing attacking potential. Additionally, the teams’ seasonal xG are similar (1.48 vs 1.45), and clean sheets are rare (Radomlje 24% and Mura 13%), which supports the idea of mutual scoring. Considering these figures, I estimate BTTS probability at 62% vs 38% and recommend a 'yes' bet.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG I estimate expected goals of 1.52 for Radomlje and 1.34 for Mura (total 2.86); these values are derived as an average between home offensive xG of Radomlje 1.48 and Mura’s defensive xG 1.56, and between away offensive xG of Mura 1.45 and Radomlje’s defensive xG 1.22. Both teams have a high percentage of matches over 1.5 goals: Radomlje 76% and Mura 75%, and the league average goals is 3.07, which confirms a tendency toward high-scoring games. With an expected total of 2.86 I assess the probability of over 1.5 goals at approximately 78%, over 2.5 at ~55% and over 3.5 at ~32%, so the strongest signal is Over 1.5. Additionally, in the last 5 matches Radomlje scored 7 and conceded 8 goals (avg. 1.4 and 1.6) and had 80% of matches over 2.5, while Mura in their last 5 has 5 scored and 6 conceded (avg. 1.0 and 1.2), which increases the likelihood of at least 2 goals in this fixture. In summary I recommend backing Over 1.5 (line 1.5, side: Over) as the most data-driven option.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Radomlje have a seasonal average of 1.18 goals scored per match versus Mura’s 0.81, and points per game of 1.35 compared to 0.50 for the visitors, indicating a home advantage in the final result. At Half-Time the hosts score on average 0.59 goals while Mura only 0.31; additionally Mura were leading at the break in just 3 matches (19%) and were behind at the break in 11 matches (69%), so a Radomlje lead at the break is a strong scenario. Radomlje average 12.12 shots per match with a 10% conversion and xG 1.48 versus Mura’s 10.75 shots, 8% conversion and xG 1.45, and Mura concede on average 2.0 goals per match this season, which increases the likelihood of the hosts maintaining their lead. On that basis the most probable HT/FT scenario is 1/1 (I assigned it 38%), with alternatives being X/X at 18% and X/1 at 8%; a visitors’ win after the break or a complete turnaround are substantially less likely.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Radomlje | Mura | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.39 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Radomlje is 42% better for: goals scored per game.
1.42 goals / game - Radomlje · 1 goals / game - Mura
Mura is 17% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.85 goals / game - Radomlje · 1.58 goals / game - Mura
Radomlje scores in 82% of games (27 of 33 meczów), while Mura keeps a clean sheet in 18% (6 of 33 meczów).
Mura scores in 55% of games (18 of 33 meczów), while Radomlje keeps a clean sheet in 9% (3 of 33 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Radomlje
Over / Under - Mura
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Radomlje is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.21 pts / game - Radomlje · 0.97 pts / game - Mura
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Radomlje - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 36%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Mura - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 24% of games and wins 24%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Radomlje
Mura
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (PrvaLiga).
Teams vs league
| Radomlje | Liga | Mura | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.27 | 3.07 | ▼ 2.58 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 76% | 59% | ▼ 42% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 79% | 65% | ▼ 52% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 9% | 23% | ▼ 18% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 88% | 85% | • 85% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 97% | 80% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Radomlje's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 1 loss against Mura. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 33% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Radomlje vs Mura?
The PrvaLiga match finished Radomlje 3:2 Mura. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Radomlje and Mura?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Radomlje won 1, Mura won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Radomlje vs Mura?
Radomlje score 1.42 goals per game on average and Mura 1.00. The PrvaLiga average is 3.07 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 76% of Radomlje's matches and 42% of Mura's.
What form are Radomlje and Mura in?
Over the last 5 games Radomlje have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Mura 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Radomlje vs Mura?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


