Raja Casablanca vs Olympic Safi: match statistics
Raja Casablanca is the clear favorite for this encounter. The hosts occupy first place in the table and display impressive home form with 57% wins and an astounding 86% clean sheets at their own stadium, conceding an average of just 0.14 goals per match. Olympic Safi is in the relegation zone in 16th position, has not won any away match this season (0% wins), and concedes an average of 1.8 goals per match on the road. The difference in quality is also visible in xG – Raja generates 1.34 xG in home matches, while Safi achieves only 1.28 xG on away trips, with significantly weaker efficiency (5% shot conversion). The goal difference of both teams (+7 for Raja in home matches vs -6 for Safi away) further confirms the hosts' advantage. Considering all statistics, a Raja Casablanca victory is the most probable scenario.
Raja Casablanca vs Olympic Safi: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Raja Casablanca played against Olympic Safi in Botola Pro (Morocco). The game was played on March 7, 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Recent form
Raja Casablanca has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Olympic Safi has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses, with 0.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Raja Casablanca scores 1.07 goals per game and allows 0.29. Olympic Safi scores 0.64 and allows 1.55. Games in this league average 2.08 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 21% of Raja Casablanca's games and 55% of Olympic Safi's. The Over 2.5 rates are 7% and 45%, compared with league averages of 45% for BTTS and 36% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Raja Casablanca has the higher season xG average, 1.35 to 1.21 per game. Raja Casablanca takes 10.4 shots per game, while Olympic Safi takes 10.1.
First-half and second-half trends
Raja Casablanca leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 0.57 goals per game after halftime. Olympic Safi leads at halftime in 9% and scores 0.55 after halftime.
When the teams score
Raja Casablanca's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (4 goals). For Olympic Safi, it is minutes 76-90+ (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Botola Pro games average 2.08 goals. Both teams score in 45% of games, and 36% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Raja Casablanca is the clear favorite for this encounter. The hosts occupy first place in the table and display impressive home form with 57% wins and an astounding 86% clean sheets at their own stadium, conceding an average of just 0.14 goals per match. Olympic Safi is in the relegation zone in 16th position, has not won any away match this season (0% wins), and concedes an average of 1.8 goals per match on the road. The difference in quality is also visible in xG – Raja generates 1.34 xG in home matches, while Safi achieves only 1.28 xG on away trips, with significantly weaker efficiency (5% shot conversion). The goal difference of both teams (+7 for Raja in home matches vs -6 for Safi away) further confirms the hosts' advantage. Considering all statistics, a Raja Casablanca victory is the most probable scenario.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Raja Casablanca | Olympic Safi | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.21 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Raja Casablanca is 300% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - Raja Casablanca · 0.4 pts / game - Olympic Safi
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Raja Casablanca is 67% better for: goals scored per game.
1.07 goals / game - Raja Casablanca · 0.64 goals / game - Olympic Safi
Raja Casablanca is 434% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.29 goals / game - Raja Casablanca · 1.55 goals / game - Olympic Safi
Raja Casablanca scores in 71% of games (10 of 14 meczów), while Olympic Safi keeps a clean sheet in 18% (2 of 11 meczów).
Olympic Safi scores in 64% of games (7 of 11 meczów), while Raja Casablanca keeps a clean sheet in 71% (10 of 14 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Raja Casablanca
Over / Under - Olympic Safi
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Raja Casablanca is 174% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2 pts / game - Raja Casablanca · 0.73 pts / game - Olympic Safi
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Raja Casablanca - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Olympic Safi - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 9% of games and wins 9%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Raja Casablanca
Olympic Safi
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).
Teams vs league
| Raja Casablanca | Liga | Olympic Safi | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.36 | 2.08 | ▲ 2.18 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 21% | 45% | ▲ 55% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 7% | 36% | ▲ 45% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 71% | 34% | ▼ 18% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 59% | ▼ 55% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 64% | 73% | ▲ 91% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of Raja Casablanca vs Olympic Safi?
The Botola Pro match finished Raja Casablanca 2:0 Olympic Safi. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Raja Casablanca vs Olympic Safi?
Raja Casablanca score 1.07 goals per game on average and Olympic Safi 0.64. The Botola Pro average is 2.08 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 36% of games. Both teams score in 21% of Raja Casablanca's matches and 55% of Olympic Safi's.
What form are Raja Casablanca and Olympic Safi in?
Over the last 5 games Raja Casablanca have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Olympic Safi 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Raja Casablanca vs Olympic Safi?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.