Rakhine United vs I.S.P.E: match statistics
Rakhine United are showing very poor form, failing to win any of their last five matches and earning just 0.2 PPG. The hosts sit a distant 11th in the table, and their home goal difference is -9, conceding an average of 2.1 goals per game. I.S.P.E., despite also struggling in away fixtures (67% loss rate), exhibit better attacking efficiency with a higher xG (1.29 vs 0.94) and a higher average of shots on target (4.63 vs 3.75). The visitors also have better form over their last five games (1.2 PPG) and a higher league position (5th place), which gives them the upper hand against the weak hosts. Considering Rakhine United's disastrous streak and I.S.P.E.'s relatively superior offensive stats, an away win is the most likely result, although a draw cannot be ruled out due to mutual defensive issues.
Rakhine United vs I.S.P.E: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Rakhine United played against I.S.P.E in National League (Myanmar (Burma)). The game was played on March 16, 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Recent form
Rakhine United has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.20 points per game. I.S.P.E has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Rakhine United scores 1.29 goals per game and allows 2.48. I.S.P.E scores 1.57 and allows 2.14. Games in this league average 3.57 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 52% of Rakhine United's games and 71% of I.S.P.E's. The Over 2.5 rates are 67% and 81%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 69% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
I.S.P.E has the higher season xG average, 1.38 to 1.07 per game. Rakhine United takes 6.1 shots per game, while I.S.P.E takes 9.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Rakhine United leads at halftime in 14% of its games and scores 0.86 goals per game after halftime. I.S.P.E leads at halftime in 33% and scores 1.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
Rakhine United's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (12 goals). For I.S.P.E, it is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
National League games average 3.57 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 69% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Rakhine United are showing very poor form, failing to win any of their last five matches and earning just 0.2 PPG. The hosts sit a distant 11th in the table, and their home goal difference is -9, conceding an average of 2.1 goals per game. I.S.P.E., despite also struggling in away fixtures (67% loss rate), exhibit better attacking efficiency with a higher xG (1.29 vs 0.94) and a higher average of shots on target (4.63 vs 3.75). The visitors also have better form over their last five games (1.2 PPG) and a higher league position (5th place), which gives them the upper hand against the weak hosts. Considering Rakhine United's disastrous streak and I.S.P.E.'s relatively superior offensive stats, an away win is the most likely result, although a draw cannot be ruled out due to mutual defensive issues.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Rakhine United | I.S.P.E | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 48% | 52% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.17 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.44 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
I.S.P.E is 500% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / game - Rakhine United · 1.2 pts / game - I.S.P.E
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
I.S.P.E is 22% better for: goals scored per game.
1.29 goals / game - Rakhine United · 1.57 goals / game - I.S.P.E
I.S.P.E is 16% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.48 goals / game - Rakhine United · 2.14 goals / game - I.S.P.E
Rakhine United scores in 67% of games (14 of 21 meczów), while I.S.P.E keeps a clean sheet in 14% (3 of 21 meczów).
I.S.P.E scores in 86% of games (18 of 21 meczów), while Rakhine United keeps a clean sheet in 24% (5 of 21 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Rakhine United
Over / Under - I.S.P.E
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
I.S.P.E is 59% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.81 pts / game - Rakhine United · 1.29 pts / game - I.S.P.E
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Rakhine United - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 24%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
I.S.P.E - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 2.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 100% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -7 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Rakhine United
I.S.P.E
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (National League).
Teams vs league
| Rakhine United | Liga | I.S.P.E | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.76 | 3.57 | ▲ 3.71 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 52% | 55% | ▲ 71% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 67% | 69% | ▲ 81% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 24% | 27% | ▼ 14% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 71% | 76% | ▲ 81% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 86% | 78% | ▲ 95% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- I.S.P.EGoalKhaing Ye Win
Head-to-head
Record from Rakhine United's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against I.S.P.E. Games average 5.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Rakhine United vs I.S.P.E?
The National League match finished Rakhine United 1:2 I.S.P.E. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Rakhine United vs I.S.P.E?
Rakhine United score 1.29 goals per game on average and I.S.P.E 1.57. The National League average is 3.57 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 69% of games. Both teams score in 52% of Rakhine United's matches and 71% of I.S.P.E's.
What form are Rakhine United and I.S.P.E in?
Over the last 5 games Rakhine United have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and I.S.P.E 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Rakhine United vs I.S.P.E?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


