Rakhine United vs Sagaing United: match statistics
Sagaing United displays significantly better form in the last five matches, earning 2.2 points per match compared to 1.4 points for Rakhine United. The guests are in great shape with a WDWWD streak, while the hosts have mixed form of LLWDW. A key factor is Sagaing's advantage in offensive quality – averaging 1.75 goals per away match and a higher xG (1.56 vs 0.97), indicating better efficiency in creating goal-scoring opportunities. Rakhine United has a decent home record (38% wins), but their defense concedes an average of 1.63 goals per match at home, which could be exploited by the offensively minded visiting team. Although Sagaing has not kept a clean sheet away this season, their current form and statistical advantage argue for an away win or a potential draw.
Rakhine United vs Sagaing United: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Rakhine United played against Sagaing United in National League (Myanmar (Burma)). The game was played on February 10, 2026. Final score: 2:2.
Recent form
Rakhine United has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Sagaing United has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Rakhine United scores 1.40 goals per game and allows 2.40. Sagaing United scores 2.13 and allows 2.25. Games in this league average 3.72 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 53% of Rakhine United's games and 75% of Sagaing United's. The Over 2.5 rates are 67% and 88%, compared with league averages of 56% for BTTS and 70% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Sagaing United has the higher season xG average, 1.71 to 1.07 per game. Rakhine United takes 7.3 shots per game, while Sagaing United takes 11.2.
First-half and second-half trends
Rakhine United leads at halftime in 20% of its games and scores 0.87 goals per game after halftime. Sagaing United leads at halftime in 31% and scores 1.25 after halftime.
When the teams score
Rakhine United's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). For Sagaing United, it is minutes 61-75 (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
National League games average 3.72 goals. Both teams score in 56% of games, and 70% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Sagaing United displays significantly better form in the last five matches, earning 2.2 points per match compared to 1.4 points for Rakhine United. The guests are in great shape with a WDWWD streak, while the hosts have mixed form of LLWDW. A key factor is Sagaing's advantage in offensive quality – averaging 1.75 goals per away match and a higher xG (1.56 vs 0.97), indicating better efficiency in creating goal-scoring opportunities. Rakhine United has a decent home record (38% wins), but their defense concedes an average of 1.63 goals per match at home, which could be exploited by the offensively minded visiting team. Although Sagaing has not kept a clean sheet away this season, their current form and statistical advantage argue for an away win or a potential draw.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Rakhine United | Sagaing United | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 48% | 47% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.40 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Sagaing United is 57% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Rakhine United · 2.2 pts / game - Sagaing United
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sagaing United is 52% better for: goals scored per game.
1.4 goals / game - Rakhine United · 2.13 goals / game - Sagaing United
Sagaing United is 7% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.4 goals / game - Rakhine United · 2.25 goals / game - Sagaing United
Rakhine United scores in 73% of games (11 of 15 meczów), while Sagaing United keeps a clean sheet in 6% (1 of 16 meczów).
Sagaing United scores in 75% of games (12 of 16 meczów), while Rakhine United keeps a clean sheet in 27% (4 of 15 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Rakhine United
Over / Under - Sagaing United
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Sagaing United is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / game - Rakhine United · 1.13 pts / game - Sagaing United
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Rakhine United - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Sagaing United - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 31% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 2.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 3.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 80% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 0% |
| No goal | 20% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Rakhine United
Sagaing United
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (National League).
Teams vs league
| Rakhine United | Liga | Sagaing United | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 3.80 | 3.72 | ▲ 4.38 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 53% | 56% | ▲ 75% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 67% | 70% | ▲ 88% |
| Clean sheets | • 27% | 26% | ▼ 6% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 73% | 76% | ▲ 81% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 87% | 80% | ▲ 94% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Record from Rakhine United's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Sagaing United. Games average 5.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Rakhine United vs Sagaing United?
The National League match finished Rakhine United 2:2 Sagaing United. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Rakhine United vs Sagaing United?
Rakhine United score 1.40 goals per game on average and Sagaing United 2.13. The National League average is 3.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 70% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Rakhine United's matches and 75% of Sagaing United's.
What form are Rakhine United and Sagaing United in?
Over the last 5 games Rakhine United have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Sagaing United 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Rakhine United vs Sagaing United?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.