Nigeria - NPFLIlorin Township StadiumData current as of November 09, 2026

Ranchers Bees vs Enyimba: match statistics

Ranchers Bees crest
Ranchers Bees
1 : 0half-time 1:0
Enyimba crest
Enyimba

Ranchers Bees vs Enyimba: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Ranchers Bees played against Enyimba in NPFL (Nigeria). The game was played on November 8, 2026. Venue: Ilorin Township Stadium. Final score: 1:0.

Recent form

Ranchers Bees has 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. Enyimba has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Ranchers Bees scores 1.10 goals per game and allows 1.40. Enyimba scores 1.09 and allows 1.36. Games in this league average 2.34 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 60% of Ranchers Bees's games and 36% of Enyimba's. The Over 2.5 rates are 60% and 36%, compared with league averages of 48% for BTTS and 40% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Enyimba has the higher season xG average, 1.81 to 1.41 per game. Ranchers Bees takes 6.5 shots per game, while Enyimba takes 10.4.

First-half and second-half trends

Ranchers Bees leads at halftime in 20% of its games and scores 0.60 goals per game after halftime. Enyimba leads at halftime in 36% and scores 0.55 after halftime.

When the teams score

Ranchers Bees's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (3 goals). For Enyimba, it is minutes 61-75 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

NPFL games average 2.34 goals. Both teams score in 48% of games, and 40% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Ranchers Bees have failed to win any of their last 5 matches, but remain unbeaten at home, having won 2 and drawn 2. Enyimba have earned more points over the last 5 rounds (7 compared with 3), but have lost 4 of their 5 away matches and are yet to win on the road. The hosts average 1.5 goals at home, while the visitors score 0.6 and concede 1.8 goals per away match. The difference in chance quality is reflected in Ranchers Bees' home xG of 2.25, compared with the 2.09 xG Enyimba concede away from home. Despite the hosts' recent dip in form, their home record and Enyimba's struggles on the road point to a Ranchers Bees win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest argument for BTTS - No is Enyimba’s attack: away from home, they average 0.6 goals and fail to score in 60% of matches. Ranchers Bees keep a clean sheet in 50% of their home matches, further increasing the likelihood that the visitors will not score. The hosts are more likely to find the net, averaging 1.5 goals at home, while Enyimba concede 1.8 goals away. Although Enyimba’s away xG is 1.51, indicating potential to create chances, their actual scoring record has been markedly weaker; the rates of matches in which both teams scored are only 33% for the hosts at home and 40% for the visitors away. Therefore, it is more likely that at least one team will fail to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Ranchers Bees average 1.5 goals at home, while Enyimba score just 0.6 goals away, limiting the potential for a high-scoring game. The hosts keep a clean sheet in 50% of their matches, while the visitors fail to score in 60% of theirs. Although the hosts’ xG is 2.04 and the visitors’ 1.51, their actual scoring output is lower: over their last five matches, the teams averaged 0.6 and 1.0 goals per game, respectively. Under 3.5 goals landed in 67% of Ranchers Bees’ matches and 80% of Enyimba’s, so with a projected total of 2.4 goals, Under 3.5 goals is the strongest pick.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Ranchers Bees led at the break in 4 of their 6 home matches, while Enyimba were trailing at half-time in 4 of their 5 away games. The hosts average 1.0 goals scored and 0.17 conceded before the break, whereas the visitors have failed to score in the first half away from home, conceding an average of 1.0 goal. The hosts also have a clear edge over the full 90 minutes: at home, they average 1.5 goals scored with an xG of 2.04, while Enyimba concede 1.8 goals away, with opponents recording an xG of 2.09. However, caution is warranted, as Ranchers Bees have not won any of their last 5 matches overall, while Enyimba have recorded 2 wins. Despite the visitors' better recent form, the significant contrast between both teams' home and away performances points to Ranchers Bees leading at the break and holding on to that lead until full-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

66Possession (%)34
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
16Shots4
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
4Shots on target1
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
2.13xG0.79
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
4Corners2
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
116Dangerous attacks62
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
5Fouls1
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
0Cards0
Ranchers BeesEnyimba

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.1Goals scored / game1.09
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
1.4Goals allowed / game1.36
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
35%Average possession42%
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
2.5Shots on target / game5
Ranchers BeesEnyimba

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

6.5Shots per game10.36
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
2.5Shots on target5
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
16.9%Shot conversion10.5%
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
35%Possession42%
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
1.41xG for1.81
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
1.4xG against1.5
Ranchers BeesEnyimba

Shooting quality

Ranchers Bees: Counter-attackingEnyimba: Balanced
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
Accuracy (shots on target)38%48%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.220.17
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.440.22

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Enyimba is 133% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / game - Ranchers Bees · 1.4 pts / game - Enyimba

Ranchers Bees
DLDLD
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
20% W30% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-3-5
0.90 pts / game · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-2-0
Last 5 at home
2-2-0
WWDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.78Opponent xG: 1.13BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Enyimba
WLDLW
Season result split
27% W18% D55% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-6
1.00 pts / game · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-4
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLDLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.69Opponent xG: 1.39BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ranchers Bees scoring profile: strong

Ranchers Bees scores in 70% of games (7 of 10 games), while Enyimba keeps a clean sheet in 36% (4 of 11 games).

Enyimba scoring profile: strong

Enyimba scores in 55% of games (6 of 11 games), while Ranchers Bees keeps a clean sheet in 30% (3 of 10 games).

11Goals scored (season)12
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
14Goals conceded (season)15
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
2.5Average goals per game2.45
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
3Goals scored (last 5)5
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
6Goals conceded (last 5)5
Ranchers BeesEnyimba

How often they score at least...

70%1 goal55%
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
20%2 goals36%
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
10%3 goals9%
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
10%4 goals9%
Ranchers BeesEnyimba

How often they concede at least...

70%1 goal64%
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
40%2 goals45%
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
30%3 goals18%
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
0%4 goals9%
Ranchers BeesEnyimba

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time0%
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
10%Scored in both halves27%
Ranchers BeesEnyimba

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS36%
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
60%BTTS - last 520%
Ranchers BeesEnyimba

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time82%
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
30%Min. 2 goals before half-time18%
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
Ranchers BeesEnyimba

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time55%
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time36%
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time27%
Ranchers BeesEnyimba

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Enyimba is 27% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / game - Ranchers Bees · 1.27 pts / game - Enyimba

Ranchers Bees - half-time state
20% leading40% draw40% trailing
Enyimba - half-time state
36% leading18% draw45% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per game (1st half)1.27
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.55
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
0.6Goals conceded (1st half)0.55
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
1.1Average goals (1st half)1.09
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
60%Clean sheet before half-time55%
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
60%No goal before half-time64%
Ranchers BeesEnyimba

After half-time (2nd half)

1.1Points per game (2nd half)0.91
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
0.6Goals scored (2nd half)0.55
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
0.8Goals conceded (2nd half)0.82
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
1.4Average goals (2nd half)1.36
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
40%Clean sheet after half-time55%
Ranchers BeesEnyimba
60%No goal after half-time55%
Ranchers BeesEnyimba

Ranchers Bees - second-half results

30% W20% D50% L
10
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 20%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Enyimba - second-half results

9% W64% D27% L
14
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.27
PPG before half-time
Lead holding75%

Leads at halftime in 36% of games and wins 27%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Ranchers Bees - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.00
Goals scored / game0.40.2
Goals allowed / game0.60.6
Average goals per game1.00.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Enyimba - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.401.40
Goals scored / game0.40.6
Goals allowed / game0.60.4
Average goals per game1.01.0
1 goal80%40%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Ranchers Bees
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
0
2
16-30
3
2
31-45
2
1
46-60
1
2
61-75
3
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Enyimba
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
2
2
16-30
2
2
31-45
2
2
46-60
4
2
61-75
0
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.48
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.2 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
48%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
39%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
14%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Ranchers Bees

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.31
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
0.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
70%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
184%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Enyimba

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.58
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.72
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
143%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
86%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NPFL).

Teams vs league

Ranchers BeesLigaEnyimba
Average goals per game▲ 2.502.34▲ 2.45
Both teams scored▲ 60%48%▼ 36%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 60%40%▼ 36%
Clean sheets▼ 30%32%▲ 36%
Goal before half-time▼ 60%69%▲ 82%
Goal after half-time▲ 80%69%▼ 55%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.34
Average goals per game
48%
Both teams scored
40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.58
Home goals / game
0.76
Away goals / game
+108%
Home attack advantage
+52%
Home defensive advantage
+46%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Ranchers BeesGoalChiedozie Okorie

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Ranchers Bees vs Enyimba?

The NPFL match finished Ranchers Bees 1:0 Enyimba. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Ranchers Bees vs Enyimba?

Ranchers Bees score 1.10 goals per game on average and Enyimba 1.09. The NPFL average is 2.34 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 40% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Ranchers Bees's matches and 36% of Enyimba's.

What form are Ranchers Bees and Enyimba in?

Over the last 5 games Ranchers Bees have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Enyimba 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ranchers Bees vs Enyimba?

The statistical background for Ranchers Bees vs Enyimba — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.