Randers vs AGF: match statistics
Randers vs AGF: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Randers played against AGF in Superliga (Denmark). The game was played on December 7, 2025. Final score: 1:2.
Recent form
Randers has 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. AGF has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Randers scores 0.94 goals per game and allows 1.29. AGF scores 2.00 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 3.24 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 41% of Randers's games and 65% of AGF's. The Over 2.5 rates are 41% and 53%, compared with league averages of 58% for BTTS and 60% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
AGF has the higher season xG average, 1.82 to 1.37 per game. Randers takes 11.5 shots per game, while AGF takes 16.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Randers leads at halftime in 12% of its games and scores 0.53 goals per game after halftime. AGF leads at halftime in 76% and scores 0.94 after halftime.
When the teams score
Randers's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (8 goals). For AGF, it is minutes 0-15 (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Superliga games average 3.24 goals. Both teams score in 58% of games, and 60% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Randers | AGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.22 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
AGF is 233% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / game - Randers · 2 pts / game - AGF
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
AGF is 113% better for: goals scored per game.
0.94 goals / game - Randers · 2 goals / game - AGF
AGF is 29% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.29 goals / game - Randers · 1 goals / game - AGF
Randers scores in 59% of games (10 of 17 meczów), while AGF keeps a clean sheet in 35% (6 of 17 meczów).
AGF scores in 94% of games (16 of 17 meczów), while Randers keeps a clean sheet in 35% (6 of 17 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Randers
Over / Under - AGF
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
AGF is 181% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.88 pts / game - Randers · 2.47 pts / game - AGF
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Randers - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 12% of games and wins 29%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
AGF - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 76% of games and wins 65%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 100% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +4 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Randers
AGF
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Superliga).
Teams vs league
| Randers | Liga | AGF | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.24 | 3.24 | ▼ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 41% | 58% | ▲ 65% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 41% | 60% | ▼ 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 35% | 23% | ▲ 35% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 53% | 77% | ▲ 82% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 47% | 77% | • 76% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Randers's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against AGF. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Randers vs AGF?
The Superliga match finished Randers 1:2 AGF. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Randers vs AGF?
Randers score 0.94 goals per game on average and AGF 2.00. The Superliga average is 3.24 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 41% of Randers's matches and 65% of AGF's.
What form are Randers and AGF in?
Over the last 5 games Randers have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and AGF 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Randers vs AGF?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.