Randers vs OB: match statistics
Randers vs OB: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Randers played against OB in Superliga (Denmark). The game was played on May 11, 2026. Final score: 2:2.
Recent form
Randers has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. OB has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Randers scores 1.03 goals per game and allows 1.33. OB scores 1.63 and allows 1.90. Games in this league average 3.04 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 47% of Randers's games and 80% of OB's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 73%, compared with league averages of 59% for BTTS and 59% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
OB has the higher season xG average, 1.47 to 1.45 per game. Randers takes 12.5 shots per game, while OB takes 12.1.
First-half and second-half trends
Randers leads at halftime in 17% of its games and scores 0.50 goals per game after halftime. OB leads at halftime in 47% and scores 0.80 after halftime.
When the teams score
Randers's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (11 goals). For OB, it is minutes 31-45+ (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Superliga games average 3.04 goals. Both teams score in 59% of games, and 59% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
OB are slight favorites: in the last 5 matches they scored 9 goals and average 1.2 points per game, while Randers scored 5 goals and average 0.8 points per game. Away, OB average 1.4 goals and show a 12% shot conversion rate, whereas Randers at home have 1.0 goal with an 8% conversion, despite the hosts attempting more shots (12.4 vs 11.67) and having more shots on target (4.53 vs 3.93). xG indicates Randers generate 1.47 xG at home versus 1.36 xG for OB away, but the hosts fail to convert this into goals (1.0 goal on 1.47 xG). Defensively Randers concede 1.4 goals at home on average and keep clean sheets in 40% of matches, while OB concede 1.87 away and have only 13% clean sheets, which balances the tie and suggests goals at both ends. Considering OB’s superior finishing and form (9 goals in 5 matches) and Randers’ poor xG realization, I predict an away win (OB).
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Strong BTTS signal: Randers has a home-seasonal BTTS rate of 87%, OB 73% away, both above the league average of 60%. Both teams concede regularly — Randers averages 1.93 goals per game, OB 1.87, and clean sheets occur in only 13% of matches for both clubs, lowering the probability of a No Goal outcome. Qualitative metrics confirm this: Randers has offensive xG 1.59 with xG against 1.38 and averages 5.53 shots on target, OB has xG 1.36 with xG against 1.74 and 3.93 shots on target, meaning OB is statistically more exposed to conceding. Additionally, the high share of matches over 2.5 goals (Randers 80%, OB 67%) and the over>2.5 + BTTS combination: 73% for Randers and 60% for OB reinforce a goal-heavy scenario from both sides. Considering the seasonal 87%/73%, last 5 matches BTTS 60% (Randers) and 80% (OB), and the low 13% clean sheets, I assess BTTS "Yes" at 80% versus 20% for "No".
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I project a total of approximately 3.04 goals: 1.67 for Randers and 1.37 for OB, based on attacking xG 1.59 (Randers) and 1.36 (OB) adjusted against conceded xG 1.74 (OB) and 1.38 (Randers). Randers averages 1.87 goals per match, OB 1.40, and both teams concede heavily (1.93 and 1.87), which favors higher-scoring games. Seasonal metrics show Over 1.5 in 93% of Randers matches and 87% of OB matches, Over 2.5 in 80% and 67%, and BTTS in 87% and 73%, strongly supporting overs and both teams to score. In the last 5 matches both teams have similar xG (1.61 vs 1.60) and total goals over the last 5 are around 3.0 (Randers 1.0, OB 1.8), so recent form further confirms an open game. Therefore I pick the Over at the 1.5 line as the strongest signal: the combination of xG (3.04 total), high Over 1.5 rates (~90%) and BTTS (~80%) provides the best edge.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Seasonal metrics favor Randers for the win: the home side averages 1.6 points per match versus OB's 1.07 and wins 47% of games compared to 27% for the visitors. xG and attacking quality confirm Randers' edge — xG 1.59 versus 1.36, on average 5.53 shots on target versus 3.93 and conversion 15% versus 12% — and the hosts score on average 1.0 goal after the break versus 0.6 for OB, with 40% of their matches having >2.5 goals in the second half vs 13% for the visitors. However, the halftime signal favors OB in the short term: in the last five matches OB led at the break in 60% of games, while Randers did not lead in any of those five (0%), and in that run OB averaged 1.0 goals at the break compared to 0.2 for Randers. First halves are rarely goalless — 93% of Randers’ matches had >0.5 goals in the first half — which increases the likelihood of an early away goal, but Randers’ superiority in xG and shots on target supports a second-half turnaround. As a result the strongest scenario is OB leading at halftime with Randers completing a turnaround by full-time (HT/FT 2/1), which is my highest-probability selection.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Randers | OB | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.23 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
OB is 50% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - Randers · 1.2 pts / game - OB
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
OB is 58% better for: goals scored per game.
1.03 goals / game - Randers · 1.63 goals / game - OB
Randers is 43% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.33 goals / game - Randers · 1.9 goals / game - OB
Randers scores in 67% of games (20 of 30 meczów), while OB keeps a clean sheet in 13% (4 of 30 meczów).
OB scores in 90% of games (27 of 30 meczów), while Randers keeps a clean sheet in 33% (10 of 30 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Randers
Over / Under - OB
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
OB is 62% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.97 pts / game - Randers · 1.57 pts / game - OB
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Randers - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 30%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
OB - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 47% of games and wins 37%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (11 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (11 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Randers
OB
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Superliga).
Teams vs league
| Randers | Liga | OB | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.37 | 3.04 | ▲ 3.53 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 47% | 59% | ▲ 80% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 59% | ▲ 73% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 24% | ▼ 13% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 63% | 73% | ▲ 93% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 60% | 78% | ▲ 87% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Randers's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses against OB. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Randers vs OB?
The Superliga match finished Randers 2:2 OB. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Randers and OB?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Randers won 0, OB won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Randers vs OB?
Randers score 1.03 goals per game on average and OB 1.63. The Superliga average is 3.04 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Randers's matches and 80% of OB's.
What form are Randers and OB in?
Over the last 5 games Randers have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and OB 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Randers vs OB?
The statistical background for Randers vs OB — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.