Norway - First DivisionEXTRA ArenaData current as of September 12, 2026

Ranheim vs Sandnes Ulf: match statistics

Ranheim crest
Ranheim
5 : 1half-time 3:0
Sandnes Ulf crest
Sandnes Ulf

Ranheim vs Sandnes Ulf: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Ranheim played against Sandnes Ulf in First Division (Norway). The game was played on May 31, 2026. Venue: EXTRA Arena. Final score: 5:1.

Recent form

Ranheim has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Sandnes Ulf has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.

Scoring records

Ranheim scores 2.63 goals per game and allows 2.13. Sandnes Ulf scores 1.22 and allows 1.44. Games in this league average 3.45 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 75% of Ranheim's games and 44% of Sandnes Ulf's. The Over 2.5 rates are 88% and 33%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 70% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Ranheim has the higher season xG average, 1.69 to 1.42 per game. Ranheim takes 14.3 shots per game, while Sandnes Ulf takes 12.1.

First-half and second-half trends

Ranheim leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 1.50 goals per game after halftime. Sandnes Ulf leads at halftime in 22% and scores 0.78 after halftime.

When the teams score

Ranheim's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (7 goals). For Sandnes Ulf, it is minutes 76-90+ (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

First Division games average 3.45 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 70% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Ranheim has a clear advantage in home metrics: 75% home win rate, an average of 3.25 goals scored per match and xG 2.02, while Sandnes Ulf averages only 0.75 goals away and xG 1.30. The hosts average 17.75 shots and 8 on target per home match versus the visitors’ 10 shots and 3 on target away, with a conversion rate of 18% versus 8%, giving Ranheim a significant edge in chance quality and efficiency. Sandnes Ulf fail to score in 50% of away matches and concede on average 1.5 goals away, whereas Ranheim concede 1.0 at home, although the hosts have let in 11 goals in the last 5 matches, indicating some defensive issues. Considering Ranheim’s 13 goals in the last 5 matches versus Sandnes’ 6 goals, alongside superior xG figures and more shots on target, I forecast a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I forecast BTTS - Yes with a 65% probability vs 35% for No, as Ranheim's offensive signals and Sandnes' recent attacking improvement strongly favor Goal/Goal. Ranheim records 60% BTTS on the season and 80% BTTS in the last 5 matches, scoring an average 2.6 goals (13 in 5) and conceding 2.2 (11), indicating high-shot-volume games. Sandnes Ulf has only 25% BTTS for the season and averages 0.75 goals per match with 50% of matches goalless, but in the last 5 matches they averaged 1.2 goals (6 goals) with an average xG of 1.55, i.e. creating more chances than the seasonal 0.75 suggests. Additionally, season xG is 1.52 for Ranheim vs 1.30 for Sandnes, and shots on target 5.0 vs 3.0 confirm the home team's offensive edge, while recent average xG against Ranheim of 1.8 and seasonal conceded average 1.4 indicate vulnerability to conceding. Considering a league BTTS of 55% and the combined recent averages of 2.6 vs 1.2 goals per match, the both teams to score scenario looks stronger, hence the pick: Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I estimate total expected xG around 2.84: Ranheim xG_for 1.52 and opponent xG_against 1.43 yield ~1.48, while Sandnes Ulf xG_for 1.30 and opponent xG_against 1.41 yield ~1.36. Ranheim averages 1.6 goals per game, 13.8 shots with 5.0 on target and a 12% conversion, whereas Sandnes averages 0.75 goals, 10.0 shots and 3.0 on target with an 8% conversion — the home side’s offensive edge increases the likelihood of more goals. In the last 5 matches Ranheim scored 13 (2.6 per match) and conceded 11 (2.2), with 80% of their last 5 games exceeding 2.5 goals; Sandnes scored 6 and conceded 7 in their last 5 (1.2 and 1.4), showing a form asymmetry. Seasonal Over 1.5 rates are 80% for Ranheim and 100% for Sandnes, and the league average is 3.45 goals per game; therefore I consider Over 1.5 the strongest signal (90%). I price Over 2.5 at 66% based on total xG 2.84 and a league Over 2.5 rate of 69%. Over 3.5 is less likely (38%) because although Ranheim have 40% of matches season-to-date with >3.5 goals, Sandnes have 0%, which limits the chance of a very high-scoring game.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Ranheim holds a clear advantage in first-half metrics: they led at the break in 40% of home matches, while Sandnes Ulf have not led at the break in any away game, and the average first-half goals are 0.8 for Ranheim versus 0.0 for the visitors. Ranheim creates more high-quality chances — xG 1.52 compared to 1.30 for Sandnes, 5.0 shots on target vs 3.0 and a higher conversion rate 12% vs 8% — which increases the hosts’ probability of scoring first. Over the full match the hosts average 1.6 goals per game vs 0.75 for the opponents, and the visitors concede on average 1.5 goals, so a first-half lead for the hosts often translates into a victory. Additionally, 80% of Ranheim’s halves feature at least one goal, making a 0-0 half unlikely; Sandnes also have poor away form (25% wins, 75% losses). Taking this into account I assess the 1/1 scenario (home team leading at half-time and winning outright) as the strongest signal with an estimated probability of approximately 35%.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

3 : 0
First half
2 : 1
Second half

Game stats

67Possession (%)33
RanheimSandnes Ulf
23Shots11
RanheimSandnes Ulf
6Shots on target4
RanheimSandnes Ulf
2.3xG1.26
RanheimSandnes Ulf
8Corners6
RanheimSandnes Ulf
61Dangerous attacks40
RanheimSandnes Ulf
8Fouls14
RanheimSandnes Ulf
0Cards2
RanheimSandnes Ulf

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

RanheimSandnes Ulf
2.63Goals scored / game1.22
RanheimSandnes Ulf
2.13Goals allowed / game1.44
RanheimSandnes Ulf
49%Average possession42%
RanheimSandnes Ulf
6.63Shots on target / game4.11
RanheimSandnes Ulf

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

14.25Shots per game12.11
RanheimSandnes Ulf
6.63Shots on target4.11
RanheimSandnes Ulf
18.4%Shot conversion10.1%
RanheimSandnes Ulf
49%Possession42%
RanheimSandnes Ulf
1.69xG for1.42
RanheimSandnes Ulf
1.71xG against1.42
RanheimSandnes Ulf

Shooting quality

Ranheim: AttackingSandnes Ulf: Balanced
RanheimSandnes Ulf
Accuracy (shots on target)47%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.400.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Ranheim is 17% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / game - Ranheim · 1.2 pts / game - Sandnes Ulf

Ranheim
WDLWL
Season result split
50% W13% D38% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-1-3
1.63 pts / game · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-1-0
Last 5 at home
3-1-0
WWDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.72Opponent xG: 1.82BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Sandnes Ulf
LLWLW
Season result split
33% W11% D56% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-1-5
1.11 pts / game · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-3
Last 5 away
1-0-3
LWLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.57Opponent xG: 1.31BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ranheim is 116% better for: goals scored per game.

2.63 goals / game - Ranheim · 1.22 goals / game - Sandnes Ulf

Sandnes Ulf is 48% better for: goals allowed per game.

2.13 goals / game - Ranheim · 1.44 goals / game - Sandnes Ulf

Ranheim scoring profile: very strong

Ranheim scores in 88% of games (7 of 8 meczów), while Sandnes Ulf keeps a clean sheet in 22% (2 of 9 meczów).

Sandnes Ulf scoring profile: very strong

Sandnes Ulf scores in 67% of games (6 of 9 meczów), while Ranheim keeps a clean sheet in 13% (1 of 8 meczów).

21Goals scored (season)11
RanheimSandnes Ulf
17Goals conceded (season)13
RanheimSandnes Ulf
4.75Average goals per game2.67
RanheimSandnes Ulf
13Goals scored (last 5)6
RanheimSandnes Ulf
11Goals conceded (last 5)7
RanheimSandnes Ulf

How often they score at least...

88%1 goal67%
RanheimSandnes Ulf
63%2 goals33%
RanheimSandnes Ulf
63%3 goals11%
RanheimSandnes Ulf
38%4 goals11%
RanheimSandnes Ulf

How often they concede at least...

88%1 goal78%
RanheimSandnes Ulf
63%2 goals56%
RanheimSandnes Ulf
38%3 goals11%
RanheimSandnes Ulf
13%4 goals0%
RanheimSandnes Ulf

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time11%
RanheimSandnes Ulf
0%BTTS in both halves0%
RanheimSandnes Ulf
50%Scored in both halves22%
RanheimSandnes Ulf

BTTS and goal count

63%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
RanheimSandnes Ulf
25%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
RanheimSandnes Ulf
80%BTTS - last 520%
RanheimSandnes Ulf

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time78%
RanheimSandnes Ulf
75%Min. 2 goals before half-time22%
RanheimSandnes Ulf
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
RanheimSandnes Ulf

2nd half

88%Min. 1 goal after half-time89%
RanheimSandnes Ulf
63%Min. 2 goals after half-time56%
RanheimSandnes Ulf
50%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
RanheimSandnes Ulf

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ranheim is 63% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.63 pts / game - Ranheim · 1 pts / game - Sandnes Ulf

Ranheim - half-time state
50% leading13% draw38% trailing
Sandnes Ulf - half-time state
22% leading33% draw44% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.63Points per game (1st half)1
RanheimSandnes Ulf
1.13Goals scored (1st half)0.44
RanheimSandnes Ulf
0.75Goals conceded (1st half)0.56
RanheimSandnes Ulf
1.88Average goals (1st half)1
RanheimSandnes Ulf
50%Clean sheet before half-time44%
RanheimSandnes Ulf
25%No goal before half-time67%
RanheimSandnes Ulf

After half-time (2nd half)

1.25Points per game (2nd half)1.11
RanheimSandnes Ulf
1.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.78
RanheimSandnes Ulf
1.38Goals conceded (2nd half)0.89
RanheimSandnes Ulf
2.88Average goals (2nd half)1.67
RanheimSandnes Ulf
25%Clean sheet after half-time33%
RanheimSandnes Ulf
38%No goal after half-time44%
RanheimSandnes Ulf

Ranheim - second-half results

38% W13% D50% L
13
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.63
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.6

Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Sandnes Ulf - second-half results

22% W44% D33% L
9
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Ranheim - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.401.40
Goals scored / game1.01.6
Goals allowed / game0.81.4
Average goals per game1.83.0
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
Sandnes Ulf - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.00
Goals scored / game0.60.6
Goals allowed / game0.60.8
Average goals per game1.21.4
1 goal100%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Ranheim
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
1
2
16-30
5
3
31-45
7
1
46-60
3
6
61-75
2
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Sandnes Ulf
ScoredConceded
2
4
0-15
0
0
16-30
2
1
31-45
2
5
46-60
2
2
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.71
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
2.0 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
59%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Ranheim

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.52
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.94
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.42
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
134%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
144%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
10% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
10%

Sandnes Ulf

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
73%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.09
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).

Teams vs league

RanheimLigaSandnes Ulf
Average goals per game 4.753.45 2.67
Both teams scored 75%55% 44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 88%70% 33%
Clean sheets 13%23% 22%
Goal before half-time 100%78% 78%
Goal after half-time 88%86% 89%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.45
Average goals per game
55%
Both teams scored
70%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.97
Home goals / game
1.48
Away goals / game
+33%
Home attack advantage
+25%
Home defensive advantage
+23%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
86%
1 goal
56%
2 goals
34%
3 goals
16%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Sandnes UlfSubstitutionOn: Jonas Brune AuneOff: Ådne Gikling Bruseth
  2. Sandnes UlfSubstitutionOn: Daniel Samuelsen ArifagicOff: Yann-Erik de Lanlay
  3. Sandnes UlfYellow cardAxel Kryger
  4. RanheimSubstitutionOn: Seydina Mohamed DiopOff: Franklin Nyenetue
  5. Sandnes UlfYellow cardGullbrandur í Horni Øregaard
  6. Sandnes UlfSubstitutionOn: Anestis TricholidisOff: Axel Kryger

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Ranheim vs Sandnes Ulf?

The First Division match finished Ranheim 5:1 Sandnes Ulf. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Ranheim vs Sandnes Ulf?

Ranheim score 2.63 goals per game on average and Sandnes Ulf 1.22. The First Division average is 3.45 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 70% of games. Both teams score in 75% of Ranheim's matches and 44% of Sandnes Ulf's.

What form are Ranheim and Sandnes Ulf in?

Over the last 5 games Ranheim have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Sandnes Ulf 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ranheim vs Sandnes Ulf?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Ranheim vs Sandnes Ulf: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.