Raufoss vs Kongsvinger: match statistics
Raufoss vs Kongsvinger: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Raufoss play Kongsvinger in First Division (Norway). The match date is 13 April 2026 at 19:00. Final score: 1:3.
Current form
Raufoss: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Kongsvinger: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Raufoss scores 1.21 and concedes 2.21 goals per match. Kongsvinger scores 2.57 and concedes 1.50. League average: 3.75 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Raufoss 57%, Kongsvinger 79%. Over 2.5: Raufoss 71%, Kongsvinger 86%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 73%.
xG, shots and style
Kongsvinger has higher xG: 1.77 vs 1.18. Raufoss: 10.4 shots per match, Kongsvinger: 14.7.
Match halves
Raufoss: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.64. Kongsvinger: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 1.50.
Goals by minute
Raufoss: 31-45+ (5 goals). Kongsvinger: 46-60 (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
First Division: 3.75 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 73%.
Head-to-head
2 H2H matches: 0-2-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.
Match description
I back the away win (Kongsvinger). The visitors sit 4th vs 10th for the hosts and average 1.4 points per game over the last 5 matches, while Raufoss only average 0.8. In attack Kongsvinger have scored 8 goals in their last 5 (1.6 per game) versus the hosts’ 6 goals (1.2 per game), and defensively the visitors conceded 7 goals (1.4 per game) compared to Raufoss’s 10 conceded (2.0 per game). The superior goal difference and slightly better recent winning record (2 wins for Kongsvinger vs 1 for Raufoss in the last 5) favor the away side, so I give the visitors the highest probability.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Raufoss | Kongsvinger | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 28% | 42% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.42 | 0.41 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Kongsvinger is 67% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Raufoss · 2 pts / match - Kongsvinger
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kongsvinger is 112% better for: goals scored per match.
1.21 goals / match - Raufoss · 2.57 goals / match - Kongsvinger
Kongsvinger is 47% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.21 goals / match - Raufoss · 1.5 goals / match - Kongsvinger
Raufoss scores in 71% of matches (10 of 14 matches), while Kongsvinger keeps a clean sheet in 14% (2 of 14 matches).
Kongsvinger scores in 93% of matches (13 of 14 matches), while Raufoss keeps a clean sheet in 14% (2 of 14 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Raufoss
Over / Under — Kongsvinger
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kongsvinger is 43% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / match - Raufoss · 1.43 pts / match - Kongsvinger
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Raufoss - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Kongsvinger - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 64%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 3.0 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +6 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (11 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Raufoss
Kongsvinger
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).
Teams vs league
| Raufoss | Liga | Kongsvinger | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 3.43 | 3.75 | ▲ 4.07 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 57% | 60% | ▲ 79% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 71% | 73% | ▲ 86% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 14% | 21% | ▼ 14% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 71% | 77% | ▲ 93% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 86% | 88% | ▲ 93% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Raufoss 0 - 2 - 0 Kongsvinger. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Raufoss vs Kongsvinger?
The First Division match finished Raufoss 1:3 Kongsvinger. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Raufoss and Kongsvinger?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Raufoss won 0, Kongsvinger won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Raufoss vs Kongsvinger?
Raufoss score 1.21 goals per game on average and Kongsvinger 2.57. The First Division average is 3.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 73% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Raufoss's matches and 79% of Kongsvinger's.
What form are Raufoss and Kongsvinger in?
Over the last 5 games Raufoss have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Kongsvinger 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Raufoss vs Kongsvinger?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Raufoss vs Kongsvinger: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.