Norway - First DivisionNAMMO stadionData current as of October 15, 2026

Raufoss vs Moss: match statistics

Raufoss crest
Raufoss
1 : 2half-time 0:1
Moss crest
Moss

Raufoss vs Moss: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Raufoss played against Moss in First Division (Norway). The game was played on October 11, 2026. Venue: NAMMO stadion. Final score: 1:2.

Recent form

Raufoss has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. Moss has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.

Scoring records

Raufoss scores 1.13 goals per game and allows 2.65. Moss scores 1.58 and allows 2.25. Games in this league average 3.82 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 61% of Raufoss's games and 83% of Moss's. The Over 2.5 rates are 74% and 88%, compared with league averages of 63% for BTTS and 71% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Moss has the higher season xG average, 1.59 to 1.22 per game. Raufoss takes 10.3 shots per game, while Moss takes 13.0.

First-half and second-half trends

Raufoss leads at halftime in 17% of its games and scores 0.61 goals per game after halftime. Moss leads at halftime in 17% and scores 0.96 after halftime.

When the teams score

Raufoss's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). For Moss, it is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

First Division games average 3.82 goals. Both teams score in 63% of games, and 71% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Moss hold a slight edge heading into this match: they have picked up 7 points in their last five games, compared with Raufoss’ 6, while conceding 10 goals against the hosts’ 17. Away from home, Moss average 1.75 goals and 5 shots on target per match, whereas Raufoss average 1.25 goals and 3.67 shots on target at home. The quality of chances created also favors Moss, whose away xG is 1.55 compared with Raufoss’ home xG of 1.32. However, backing the visitors remains a cautious call, as Moss concede an average of 2.33 goals away from home and have yet to keep a clean sheet on the road, giving the hosts a genuine chance to score.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams have recorded BTTS in 83% of their matches, well above the league average of 63%, making goals at both ends a strong pick. Raufoss average 1.42 goals scored, while Moss average 1.75, but they concede 2.17 and 2.33 goals per match, respectively. Their attacking potential is backed up by xG figures of 1.63 for the hosts and 1.55 for the visitors, while Moss are yet to keep a clean sheet. In their last five matches, both teams averaged 1.4 goals scored, while conceding 3.4 and 2.0 respectively, further supporting the prospect of goals from both sides. The main risk is Raufoss failing to score, but this has happened in only 8% of their matches this season, compared with 17% for Moss.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Raufoss matches average 3.59 goals, while Moss matches average 4.08; both teams also concede more than 2 goals per game. At least 2 goals were scored in 92% of Raufoss matches and 100% of Moss matches, making Over 1.5 the strongest signal. Their attacking potential is backed up by average xG figures of 1.63 for Raufoss and 1.55 for Moss, while their opponents allow 1.74 and 1.62 xG respectively. In their last 5 matches, Raufoss conceded an average of 3.4 goals and Moss 2.0, further supporting the expectation of at least two goals, although higher lines remain less certain.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest, though uncertain, signal points to Raufoss leading at the break and Moss winning at the final whistle. Raufoss led at half-time in 2 of their last 5 matches, while Moss were trailing at the break in 4 of 5 and never led. The trend reverses after the break: in their last 5 matches, Moss won the second half 60% of the time, while Raufoss lost it just as often. Over that period, Raufoss conceded an average of 2.0 goals after half-time, compared with 0.6 for Moss, increasing the visitors’ chances of completing a turnaround. Moss’s higher season win rate—42% compared with Raufoss’s 17%—also supports a full-time win, although a turnaround remains a risky scenario.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
1 : 1
Second half

Game stats

46Possession (%)54
RaufossMoss
10Shots8
RaufossMoss
2Shots on target4
RaufossMoss
1xG1.03
RaufossMoss
4Corners6
RaufossMoss
31Dangerous attacks33
RaufossMoss
10Fouls5
RaufossMoss
0Cards1
RaufossMoss

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.13Goals scored / game1.58
RaufossMoss
2.65Goals allowed / game2.25
RaufossMoss
42%Average possession48%
RaufossMoss
3.22Shots on target / game4.96
RaufossMoss

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10.3Shots per game13
RaufossMoss
3.22Shots on target4.96
RaufossMoss
11%Shot conversion12.2%
RaufossMoss
42%Possession48%
RaufossMoss
1.22xG for1.59
RaufossMoss
1.92xG against1.68
RaufossMoss

Shooting quality

Raufoss: BalancedMoss: Balanced
RaufossMoss
Accuracy (shots on target)31%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Moss is 100% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / game - Raufoss · 1.2 pts / game - Moss

Raufoss
LLLWL
Season result split
26% W4% D70% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-1-16
0.83 pts / game · goal difference -35
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-1-7
Last 5 at home
1-0-4
LLLWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 3.6xG: 1.42Opponent xG: 1.94BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Moss
LWLWL
Season result split
29% W17% D54% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-4-13
1.04 pts / game · goal difference -16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
5-0-7
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LLLWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.38Opponent xG: 1.67BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Moss is 40% better for: goals scored per game.

1.13 goals / game - Raufoss · 1.58 goals / game - Moss

Moss is 18% better for: goals allowed per game.

2.65 goals / game - Raufoss · 2.25 goals / game - Moss

Raufoss scoring profile: very strong

Raufoss scores in 70% of games (16 of 23 games), while Moss keeps a clean sheet in 4% (1 of 24 games).

Moss scoring profile: very strong

Moss scores in 88% of games (21 of 24 games), while Raufoss keeps a clean sheet in 9% (2 of 23 games).

26Goals scored (season)38
RaufossMoss
61Goals conceded (season)54
RaufossMoss
3.78Average goals per game3.83
RaufossMoss
4Goals scored (last 5)7
RaufossMoss
18Goals conceded (last 5)11
RaufossMoss

How often they score at least...

70%1 goal88%
RaufossMoss
30%2 goals46%
RaufossMoss
13%3 goals21%
RaufossMoss
0%4 goals4%
RaufossMoss

How often they concede at least...

91%1 goal96%
RaufossMoss
61%2 goals83%
RaufossMoss
43%3 goals33%
RaufossMoss
22%4 goals13%
RaufossMoss

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

30%BTTS at half-time38%
RaufossMoss
4%BTTS in both halves8%
RaufossMoss
22%Scored in both halves21%
RaufossMoss

BTTS and goal count

57%Min. 3 goals and BTTS79%
RaufossMoss
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
RaufossMoss
60%BTTS - last 580%
RaufossMoss

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

78%Min. 1 goal before half-time83%
RaufossMoss
57%Min. 2 goals before half-time58%
RaufossMoss
26%Min. 3 goals before half-time33%
RaufossMoss

2nd half

91%Min. 1 goal after half-time92%
RaufossMoss
52%Min. 2 goals after half-time58%
RaufossMoss
30%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
RaufossMoss

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Raufoss is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.87 pts / game - Raufoss · 0.79 pts / game - Moss

Raufoss - half-time state
17% leading35% draw48% trailing
Moss - half-time state
17% leading29% draw54% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.87Points per game (1st half)0.79
RaufossMoss
0.52Goals scored (1st half)0.63
RaufossMoss
1.22Goals conceded (1st half)1.25
RaufossMoss
1.74Average goals (1st half)1.88
RaufossMoss
35%Clean sheet before half-time25%
RaufossMoss
57%No goal before half-time54%
RaufossMoss

After half-time (2nd half)

0.96Points per game (2nd half)1.29
RaufossMoss
0.61Goals scored (2nd half)0.96
RaufossMoss
1.43Goals conceded (2nd half)1
RaufossMoss
2.04Average goals (2nd half)1.96
RaufossMoss
35%Clean sheet after half-time33%
RaufossMoss
52%No goal after half-time38%
RaufossMoss

Raufoss - second-half results

26% W17% D57% L
20
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-16
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
-19
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.87
PPG before half-time
Lead holding153%

Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 26%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Moss - second-half results

38% W17% D46% L
19
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-15
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.79
PPG before half-time
Lead holding171%

Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 29%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.3

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Raufoss - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.600.40
Goals scored / game0.20.6
Goals allowed / game1.42.2
Average goals per game1.62.8
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%0%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-6-8
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Moss - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.201.80
Goals scored / game0.60.8
Goals allowed / game1.60.6
Average goals per game2.21.4
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet0%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-5+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Raufoss
ScoredConceded
3
8
0-15
3
8
16-30
6
12
31-45
5
12
46-60
3
10
61-75
6
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Moss
ScoredConceded
5
7
0-15
5
11
16-30
5
12
31-45
8
8
46-60
6
7
61-75
9
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.81
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.7 : 2.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
72%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-12%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Raufoss

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.70
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.82
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+8.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.73
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
53%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
156%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Moss

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.58
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.57
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
93%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
106%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.16
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).

Teams vs league

RaufossLigaMoss
Average goals per game• 3.783.82• 3.83
Both teams scored▼ 61%63%▲ 83%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 74%71%▲ 88%
Clean sheets▼ 9%19%▼ 4%
Goal before half-time• 78%77%▲ 83%
Goal after half-time• 91%90%▲ 92%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.82
Average goals per game
63%
Both teams scored
71%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
19%
Clean sheets
2.13
Home goals / game
1.70
Away goals / game
+25%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defensive advantage
+16%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
29%
3 goals
10%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
90%
1 goal
63%
2 goals
35%
3 goals
17%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. MossYellow cardOmar Jebali
  2. RaufossSubstitutionOn: Markus Myre AaneslandOff: Yaw Agyeman
  3. MossSubstitutionOn: Momodou Lion NjieOff: Jamiu Musbaudeen
  4. MossSubstitutionOn: Moussa NjieOff: Lasse Overgaard Nielsen

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Raufoss's perspective: 2 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Moss. Games average 3.33 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

Moss
1 : 2
Raufoss
Moss FK
1 : 1
Raufoss IL
Raufoss IL
3 : 2
Moss FK

FAQ

What was the result of Raufoss vs Moss?

The First Division match finished Raufoss 1:2 Moss. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Raufoss and Moss?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Raufoss won 2, Moss won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Raufoss vs Moss?

Raufoss score 1.13 goals per game on average and Moss 1.58. The First Division average is 3.82 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 71% of games. Both teams score in 61% of Raufoss's matches and 83% of Moss's.

What form are Raufoss and Moss in?

Over the last 5 games Raufoss have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Moss 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Raufoss vs Moss?

The statistical background for Raufoss vs Moss — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.