Ravenna vs Pianese: match statistics
Ravenna displays impressive home form with 79% wins and only 7% losses at their own stadium, scoring an average of 1.64 goals while maintaining 50% clean sheets. The hosts are in excellent disposition, winning 3 of their last 5 matches and maintaining a solid goal difference of +12 in home games. Pianese, on the other hand, performs significantly worse on away trips, winning only 29% of matches and struggling to score goals (average 0.79 per match), failing to find the net in 43% of away games. The difference in quality between the two teams is also visible in possession statistics (52% vs 40%) and shot efficiency, which speaks in favor of Ravenna. Considering all these factors, I expect a confident victory for the hosts, although Pianese's solid defense may mean it will be a win by a small margin.
Ravenna vs Pianese: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Ravenna played against Pianese in Serie C Group B (Italy). The game was played on March 4, 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Recent form
Ravenna has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Pianese has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Ravenna scores 1.46 goals per game and allows 0.93. Pianese scores 1.07 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.26 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of Ravenna's games and 50% of Pianese's. The Over 2.5 rates are 46% and 29%, compared with league averages of 49% for BTTS and 38% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Ravenna has the higher season xG average, 1.46 to 1.33 per game. Ravenna takes 11.8 shots per game, while Pianese takes 10.9.
First-half and second-half trends
Ravenna leads at halftime in 39% of its games and scores 0.82 goals per game after halftime. Pianese leads at halftime in 25% and scores 0.43 after halftime.
When the teams score
Ravenna's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (12 goals). For Pianese, it is minutes 31-45+ (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Serie C Group B games average 2.26 goals. Both teams score in 49% of games, and 38% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Ravenna displays impressive home form with 79% wins and only 7% losses at their own stadium, scoring an average of 1.64 goals while maintaining 50% clean sheets. The hosts are in excellent disposition, winning 3 of their last 5 matches and maintaining a solid goal difference of +12 in home games. Pianese, on the other hand, performs significantly worse on away trips, winning only 29% of matches and struggling to score goals (average 0.79 per match), failing to find the net in 43% of away games. The difference in quality between the two teams is also visible in possession statistics (52% vs 40%) and shot efficiency, which speaks in favor of Ravenna. Considering all these factors, I expect a confident victory for the hosts, although Pianese's solid defense may mean it will be a win by a small margin.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Ravenna | Pianese | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Ravenna is 25% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Ravenna · 1.6 pts / game - Pianese
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Ravenna is 36% better for: goals scored per game.
1.46 goals / game - Ravenna · 1.07 goals / game - Pianese
Ravenna is 8% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.93 goals / game - Ravenna · 1 goals / game - Pianese
Ravenna scores in 82% of games (23 of 28 meczów), while Pianese keeps a clean sheet in 32% (9 of 28 meczów).
Pianese scores in 64% of games (18 of 28 meczów), while Ravenna keeps a clean sheet in 36% (10 of 28 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Ravenna
Over / Under - Pianese
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Ravenna is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.57 pts / game - Ravenna · 1.39 pts / game - Pianese
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Ravenna - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 39% of games and wins 61%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Pianese - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 32%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.60 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 100% |
| Goal difference | +5 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Ravenna
Pianese
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group B).
Teams vs league
| Ravenna | Liga | Pianese | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.39 | 2.26 | ▼ 2.07 |
| Both teams scored | • 50% | 49% | • 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 46% | 38% | ▼ 29% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 36% | 30% | ▲ 32% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 68% | 64% | ▼ 57% |
| Goal after half-time | • 71% | 71% | ▼ 68% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Ravenna's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Pianese. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Ravenna vs Pianese?
The Serie C Group B match finished Ravenna 0:0 Pianese. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Ravenna vs Pianese?
Ravenna score 1.46 goals per game on average and Pianese 1.07. The Serie C Group B average is 2.26 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Ravenna's matches and 50% of Pianese's.
What form are Ravenna and Pianese in?
Over the last 5 games Ravenna have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Pianese 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ravenna vs Pianese?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Ravenna vs Pianese: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.