Reading vs Exeter City: match statistics
Reading presents solid home form with 50% of matches won at home and an impressive goal difference of +4 at their own stadium. The hosts score an average of 1.29 goals per match at home, while keeping 36% clean sheets, which testifies to defensive stability. Exeter City has very weak away statistics – as many as 64% losses away and only 29% wins, with Failed To Score at a level of 43%, which means frequent problems with scoring goals. Additionally, the visitors have a negative goal difference of -5 in away matches and score an average of only 0.79 goals per match away. The form of the last five matches is comparable (Reading 1.6 PPG vs Exeter 2.0 PPG), however, the hosts' advantage on their own turf and the distinct weakness of Exeter in away matches speak for a Reading victory.
Reading vs Exeter City: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Reading played against Exeter City in EFL League One (England). The game was played on January 27, 2026. Final score: 2:2.
Recent form
Reading has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Exeter City has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Reading scores 1.35 goals per game and allows 1.27. Exeter City scores 1.19 and allows 0.92. Games in this league average 2.54 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 65% of Reading's games and 35% of Exeter City's. The Over 2.5 rates are 42% and 38%, compared with league averages of 51% for BTTS and 49% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Reading has the higher season xG average, 1.35 to 1.20 per game. Reading takes 12.0 shots per game, while Exeter City takes 10.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Reading leads at halftime in 35% of its games and scores 0.73 goals per game after halftime. Exeter City leads at halftime in 31% and scores 0.73 after halftime.
When the teams score
Reading's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). For Exeter City, it is minutes 46-60 (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
League One games average 2.54 goals. Both teams score in 51% of games, and 49% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Reading presents solid home form with 50% of matches won at home and an impressive goal difference of +4 at their own stadium. The hosts score an average of 1.29 goals per match at home, while keeping 36% clean sheets, which testifies to defensive stability. Exeter City has very weak away statistics – as many as 64% losses away and only 29% wins, with Failed To Score at a level of 43%, which means frequent problems with scoring goals. Additionally, the visitors have a negative goal difference of -5 in away matches and score an average of only 0.79 goals per match away. The form of the last five matches is comparable (Reading 1.6 PPG vs Exeter 2.0 PPG), however, the hosts' advantage on their own turf and the distinct weakness of Exeter in away matches speak for a Reading victory.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Reading | Exeter City | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Exeter City is 63% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - Reading · 2.6 pts / game - Exeter City
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Reading is 13% better for: goals scored per game.
1.35 goals / game - Reading · 1.19 goals / game - Exeter City
Exeter City is 38% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.27 goals / game - Reading · 0.92 goals / game - Exeter City
Reading scores in 88% of games (23 of 26 meczów), while Exeter City keeps a clean sheet in 35% (9 of 26 meczów).
Exeter City scores in 69% of games (18 of 26 meczów), while Reading keeps a clean sheet in 23% (6 of 26 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Reading
Over / Under - Exeter City
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Reading is 12% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.42 pts / game - Reading · 1.27 pts / game - Exeter City
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Reading - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 35% of games and wins 35%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Exeter City - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 31% of games and wins 42%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +6 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Reading
Exeter City
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League One).
Teams vs league
| Reading | Liga | Exeter City | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.62 | 2.54 | ▼ 2.12 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 65% | 51% | ▼ 35% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 42% | 49% | ▼ 38% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 23% | 27% | ▲ 35% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 73% | 68% | ▲ 73% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 88% | 81% | ▼ 69% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Reading's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Exeter City. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Reading vs Exeter City?
The EFL League One match finished Reading 2:2 Exeter City. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Reading vs Exeter City?
Reading score 1.35 goals per game on average and Exeter City 1.19. The EFL League One average is 2.54 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Reading's matches and 35% of Exeter City's.
What form are Reading and Exeter City in?
Over the last 5 games Reading have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Exeter City 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Reading vs Exeter City?
The statistical background for Reading vs Exeter City — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.