England - EFL League OneSelect Car Leasing StadiumData current as of November 03, 2026

Reading vs Notts County: match statistics

Reading crest
Reading
2 : 0half-time 0:0
Notts County crest
Notts County

Reading vs Notts County: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Reading played against Notts County in EFL League One (England). The game was played on September 19, 2026. Venue: Select Car Leasing Stadium. Final score: 2:0.

Recent form

Reading has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Notts County has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss, with 1.20 points per game.

Scoring records

Reading scores 2.40 goals per game and allows 1.40. Notts County scores 1.17 and allows 1.17. Games in this league average 3.04 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 60% of Reading's games and 83% of Notts County's. The Over 2.5 rates are 80% and 33%, compared with league averages of 64% for BTTS and 59% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Reading has the higher season xG average, 1.76 to 1.30 per game. Reading takes 17.4 shots per game, while Notts County takes 12.3.

First-half and second-half trends

Reading leads at halftime in 80% of its games and scores 0.80 goals per game after halftime. Notts County leads at halftime in 0% and scores 0.83 after halftime.

When the teams score

Reading's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). For Notts County, it is minutes 76-90+ (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

League One games average 3.04 goals. Both teams score in 64% of games, and 59% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Reading have a clearly superior recent record, collecting 10 points from five matches with 3 wins, a draw, and a defeat, while Notts County have picked up 6 points after drawing 3 of their 5 games. At home, the hosts average 3.67 goals per match, along with 18.33 shots and 6 shots on target, whereas the visitors manage just 1.33 goals, 9.67 shots, and 3.33 shots on target away from home. Reading’s advantage is also evident in the quality of chances created: their average home xG stands at 1.89, compared with 1.04 for Notts County away from home. The hosts’ defense is not flawless, conceding an average of 1.67 goals, but the visitors have failed to win any of their three away matches, drawing all of them. Notts County should be capable of scoring, but Reading’s greater attacking intensity and efficiency point towards a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for both teams to score is clear: BTTS occurred in 67% of Reading matches and as many as 100% of Notts County games, compared with the league average of 63%. Neither team has kept a clean sheet yet, while Notts County concede an average of 1.33 goals per match with an xG against of 1.63. Reading create plenty of chances, averaging 15 shots and generating 1.54 xG, so they should be able to exploit the visitors’ defensive weakness. Notts County have a lower attacking xG of 1.04, but Reading have allowed opponents an xG of 1.14 over their last five matches, giving the visitors a realistic route to goal. The risk to BTTS comes from Reading’s defensive improvement, with only 0.6 goals conceded per game across their last five outings, but the overall profile of both teams still supports the “BTTS - Yes” scenario more strongly.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Reading create chances worth 1.54 xG at home, while Notts County allow opponents 1.63 xG away from home, pointing to approximately 1.6 goals for the hosts. The visitors average 1.04 xG, but Reading concede only 0.87 xG at home, keeping their projected goal tally below 1.0. Both teams have recorded Under 2.5 goals in 67% of their matches, while Reading have yet to play a game finishing Over 3.5 goals, and this outcome has occurred in only 33% of Notts County’s matches. Reading’s recent form is stronger offensively, scoring 12 goals in their last five matches, but they have also conceded just 3, which limits the likelihood of a very high-scoring game. The strongest signal is therefore Under 3.5: the projected total of 2.55 goals and the hosts’ lack of any four-goal results so far support a maximum of three goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Reading are in clearly better form: they have won 3 of their last 5 matches, scoring an average of 2.4 goals and conceding just 0.6, while Notts County have won only 20% of their games. The strongest signal concerns the first half, as the hosts were leading at the break in 80% of their last 5 appearances, scoring an average of 1.4 goals and conceding none. The visitors failed to lead at half-time in any of their last 5 matches, and went into the break trailing in 40% of them, conceding an average of 0.8 goals before half-time. Reading’s advantage is also supported by average xG figures of 1.54 compared with 1.04, as well as expected goals conceded of 0.87 against 1.63 for Notts County. After the interval, the hosts continue to score an average of 1.0 goal, making a Reading lead at half-time followed by a full-time victory the most likely scenario.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
2 : 0
Second half

Game stats

48Possession (%)52
ReadingNotts County
17Shots12
ReadingNotts County
7Shots on target2
ReadingNotts County
1.73xG1.06
ReadingNotts County
4Corners1
ReadingNotts County
25Dangerous attacks22
ReadingNotts County
13Fouls12
ReadingNotts County
2Cards1
ReadingNotts County

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

ReadingNotts County
2.4Goals scored / game1.17
ReadingNotts County
1.4Goals allowed / game1.17
ReadingNotts County
50%Average possession44%
ReadingNotts County
5Shots on target / game3.5
ReadingNotts County

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

17.4Shots per game12.33
ReadingNotts County
5Shots on target3.5
ReadingNotts County
13.8%Shot conversion9.5%
ReadingNotts County
50%Possession44%
ReadingNotts County
1.76xG for1.3
ReadingNotts County
1.14xG against1.25
ReadingNotts County

Shooting quality

Reading: AttackingNotts County: Balanced
ReadingNotts County
Accuracy (shots on target)29%28%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.100.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.480.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Reading is 17% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / game - Reading · 1.2 pts / game - Notts County

Reading
LDWWL
Season result split
40% W20% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-1
Last 5 at home
2-0-1
LWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.76Opponent xG: 1.14BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Notts County
DWDDL
Season result split
17% W67% D17% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-4-1
1.17 pts / game · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-3-0
Last 5 away
0-3-0
DDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.25Opponent xG: 1.27BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Reading is 105% better for: goals scored per game.

2.4 goals / game - Reading · 1.17 goals / game - Notts County

Notts County is 20% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.4 goals / game - Reading · 1.17 goals / game - Notts County

Reading scoring profile: very strong

Reading scores in 80% of games (4 of 5 games), while Notts County keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 6 games).

Notts County scoring profile: strong

Notts County scores in 83% of games (5 of 6 games), while Reading keeps a clean sheet in 40% (2 of 5 games).

12Goals scored (season)7
ReadingNotts County
7Goals conceded (season)7
ReadingNotts County
3.8Average goals per game2.33
ReadingNotts County
12Goals scored (last 5)6
ReadingNotts County
7Goals conceded (last 5)6
ReadingNotts County

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal83%
ReadingNotts County
60%2 goals33%
ReadingNotts County
60%3 goals0%
ReadingNotts County
20%4 goals0%
ReadingNotts County

How often they concede at least...

60%1 goal100%
ReadingNotts County
40%2 goals17%
ReadingNotts County
20%3 goals0%
ReadingNotts County
20%4 goals0%
ReadingNotts County

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time33%
ReadingNotts County
0%BTTS in both halves17%
ReadingNotts County
40%Scored in both halves17%
ReadingNotts County

BTTS and goal count

60%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
ReadingNotts County
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
ReadingNotts County
60%BTTS - last 580%
ReadingNotts County

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
ReadingNotts County
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
ReadingNotts County
40%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
ReadingNotts County

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
ReadingNotts County
80%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
ReadingNotts County
40%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
ReadingNotts County

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Reading is 288% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.6 pts / game - Reading · 0.67 pts / game - Notts County

Reading - half-time state
80% leading20% draw0% trailing
Notts County - half-time state
0% leading67% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.6Points per game (1st half)0.67
ReadingNotts County
1.6Goals scored (1st half)0.33
ReadingNotts County
0.2Goals conceded (1st half)0.67
ReadingNotts County
1.8Average goals (1st half)1
ReadingNotts County
80%Clean sheet before half-time33%
ReadingNotts County
20%No goal before half-time67%
ReadingNotts County

After half-time (2nd half)

1.4Points per game (2nd half)1.5
ReadingNotts County
0.8Goals scored (2nd half)0.83
ReadingNotts County
1.2Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
ReadingNotts County
2Average goals (2nd half)1.33
ReadingNotts County
40%Clean sheet after half-time50%
ReadingNotts County
60%No goal after half-time33%
ReadingNotts County

Reading - second-half results

40% W20% D40% L
13
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding50%

Leads at halftime in 80% of games and wins 40%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+1.0

Allows 1.0 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Notts County - second-half results

33% W50% D17% L
4
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.67
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime-0.2

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Reading - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.601.40
Goals scored / game1.60.8
Goals allowed / game0.21.2
Average goals per game1.82.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+7-2
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 8
Notts County - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.601.60
Goals scored / game0.40.8
Goals allowed / game0.80.4
Average goals per game1.21.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-2+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Reading
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
6
0
31-45
2
3
46-60
0
1
61-75
2
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Notts County
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
1
1
16-30
1
2
31-45
0
1
46-60
2
2
61-75
3
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.07
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.8 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
72%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
66%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Reading

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.62
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.38
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.64
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
146%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
99%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.8
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Notts County

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
83%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
71%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
43% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
43%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League One).

Teams vs league

ReadingLigaNotts County
Average goals per game▲ 3.803.04▼ 2.33
Both teams scored▼ 60%64%▲ 83%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 80%59%▼ 33%
Clean sheets▲ 40%23%▼ 0%
Goal before half-time▲ 80%68%• 67%
Goal after half-time• 80%81%▲ 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.04
Average goals per game
64%
Both teams scored
59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.64
Home goals / game
1.41
Away goals / game
+16%
Home attack advantage
+14%
Home defensive advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
30%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Notts CountyYellow cardHindolo Mustapha
  2. ReadingGoalJack MarriottAssist: Hayden Roberts
  3. ReadingGoalJack MarriottAssist: Kyrell Lisbie
  4. Notts CountySubstitutionOn: Callum RobertsOff: Oliver Cooper
  5. ReadingYellow cardKyrell Lisbie
  6. ReadingYellow cardPatrick John Lane

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Reading vs Notts County?

The EFL League One match finished Reading 2:0 Notts County. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Reading vs Notts County?

Reading score 2.40 goals per game on average and Notts County 1.17. The EFL League One average is 3.04 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Reading's matches and 83% of Notts County's.

What form are Reading and Notts County in?

Over the last 5 games Reading have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Notts County 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Reading vs Notts County?

The statistical background for Reading vs Notts County — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.