England - EFL League OneData current as of 23 July 2026

Reading vs Plymouth Argyle: match statistics

Reading crest
Reading
2 : 2half-time 2:1
Plymouth Argyle crest
Plymouth Argyle
135%(2.75)
X30%(3.60)
235%(2.30)

The match promises to be highly closely contested, which points towards a draw. Reading shows solid home form with a 50% home win rate and only 17% defeats, however, their last five overall matches (2-2-1) indicate some instability. Plymouth Argyle also records a 50% win rate in away matches, but a massive 44% loss rate, making them an unpredictable opponent. The key factor is the visitors' advantage in recent form (1.8 PPG vs 1.6 PPG) and better offensive efficiency on the road (1.67 goals on average). An identical goal difference (+6) for both Reading at home and Plymouth away confirms the balance of power. Considering Reading's high draw rate in home matches (33%) and the slight difference in the xG values of both teams, I expect a tight clash ending in a share of the points.

Reading vs Plymouth Argyle: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Reading play Plymouth Argyle in EFL League One (England). The match date is 14 March 2026 at 16:00. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Reading: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Plymouth Argyle: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Reading scores 1.39 and concedes 1.30 goals per match. Plymouth Argyle scores 1.63 and concedes 1.37. League average: 2.62 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Reading 67%, Plymouth Argyle 54%. Over 2.5: Reading 48%, Plymouth Argyle 59%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 51%.

xG, shots and style

Plymouth Argyle has higher xG: 1.53 vs 1.23. Reading: 11.0 shots per match, Plymouth Argyle: 13.8.

Match halves

Reading: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.76. Plymouth Argyle: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.89.

Goals by minute

Reading: 76-90+ (16 goals). Plymouth Argyle: 31-45+ (16 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

League One: 2.62 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 51%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

The match promises to be highly closely contested, which points towards a draw. Reading shows solid home form with a 50% home win rate and only 17% defeats, however, their last five overall matches (2-2-1) indicate some instability. Plymouth Argyle also records a 50% win rate in away matches, but a massive 44% loss rate, making them an unpredictable opponent. The key factor is the visitors' advantage in recent form (1.8 PPG vs 1.6 PPG) and better offensive efficiency on the road (1.67 goals on average). An identical goal difference (+6) for both Reading at home and Plymouth away confirms the balance of power. Considering Reading's high draw rate in home matches (33%) and the slight difference in the xG values of both teams, I expect a tight clash ending in a share of the points.

Half-by-half

2 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
ReadingPlymouth Argyle
14Shots18
ReadingPlymouth Argyle
8Shots on target2
ReadingPlymouth Argyle
1.64xG1.67
ReadingPlymouth Argyle
3Corners3
ReadingPlymouth Argyle
27Dangerous attacks54
ReadingPlymouth Argyle
11Fouls17
ReadingPlymouth Argyle
1Cards3
ReadingPlymouth Argyle

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

ReadingPlymouth Argyle
1.39Goals scored / match1.63
ReadingPlymouth Argyle
1.3Goals conceded / match1.37
ReadingPlymouth Argyle
50%Average possession48%
ReadingPlymouth Argyle
3.78Shots on target / match4.85
ReadingPlymouth Argyle

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.96Shots per match13.78
ReadingPlymouth Argyle
3.78Shots on target4.85
ReadingPlymouth Argyle
12.7%Shot conversion11.8%
ReadingPlymouth Argyle
50%Possession48%
ReadingPlymouth Argyle
1.23xG for1.53
ReadingPlymouth Argyle
1.42xG against1.39
ReadingPlymouth Argyle

Shooting quality

Reading: BalancedPlymouth Argyle: Balanced
ReadingPlymouth Argyle
Accuracy (shots on target)34%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Plymouth Argyle is 1000% better for: last-5 form.

0.2 pts / match - Reading · 2.2 pts / match - Plymouth Argyle

Reading
LLLDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
35% W33% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
16-15-15
1.37 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
10-7-6
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
DWLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.13Opponent xG: 1.37BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Plymouth Argyle
DWDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
48% W15% R37% P
Season (W-D-L)
22-7-17
1.59 pts / match · goal difference +12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
12-3-8
Last 5 away
3-2-0
DWWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 2.05Opponent xG: 1.34BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Plymouth Argyle is 17% better for: goals scored per match.

1.39 goals / match - Reading · 1.63 goals / match - Plymouth Argyle

Reading is 5% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.3 goals / match - Reading · 1.37 goals / match - Plymouth Argyle

Reading scoring profile: very strong

Reading scores in 85% of matches (39 of 46 matches), while Plymouth Argyle keeps a clean sheet in 26% (12 of 46 matches).

Plymouth Argyle scoring profile: very strong

Plymouth Argyle scores in 80% of matches (37 of 46 matches), while Reading keeps a clean sheet in 17% (8 of 46 matches).

64Goals scored (season)75
ReadingPlymouth Argyle
60Goals conceded (season)63
ReadingPlymouth Argyle
2.7Average goals in match3
ReadingPlymouth Argyle
3Goals scored (last 5)11
ReadingPlymouth Argyle
8Goals conceded (last 5)7
ReadingPlymouth Argyle

How often they score at least...

85%1 goal80%
ReadingPlymouth Argyle
39%2 goals39%
ReadingPlymouth Argyle
13%3 goals28%
ReadingPlymouth Argyle
2%4 goals11%
ReadingPlymouth Argyle

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal74%
ReadingPlymouth Argyle
39%2 goals41%
ReadingPlymouth Argyle
9%3 goals15%
ReadingPlymouth Argyle
0%4 goals7%
ReadingPlymouth Argyle

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

52%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time26%
ReadingPlymouth Argyle
11%BTTS in both halves4%
ReadingPlymouth Argyle
26%Scored in both halves33%
ReadingPlymouth Argyle

BTTS and goal count

43%Min. 3 goals and BTTS43%
ReadingPlymouth Argyle
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS15%
ReadingPlymouth Argyle
60%BTTS - last 5100%
ReadingPlymouth Argyle

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

70%Min. 1 goal before half-time76%
ReadingPlymouth Argyle
28%Min. 2 goals before half-time39%
ReadingPlymouth Argyle
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
ReadingPlymouth Argyle

2nd half

93%Min. 1 goal after half-time87%
ReadingPlymouth Argyle
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time48%
ReadingPlymouth Argyle
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
ReadingPlymouth Argyle

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Reading - half-time state
33% leading46% draw22% trailing
Plymouth Argyle - half-time state
33% leading39% draw28% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.43Points per match (1st half)1.37
ReadingPlymouth Argyle
0.63Goals scored (1st half)0.74
ReadingPlymouth Argyle
0.41Goals conceded (1st half)0.67
ReadingPlymouth Argyle
1.04Average goals (1st half)1.41
ReadingPlymouth Argyle
59%Clean sheet before half-time48%
ReadingPlymouth Argyle
52%No goal before half-time50%
ReadingPlymouth Argyle

After half-time (2nd half)

1.2Points per match (2nd half)1.59
ReadingPlymouth Argyle
0.76Goals scored (2nd half)0.89
ReadingPlymouth Argyle
0.89Goals conceded (2nd half)0.7
ReadingPlymouth Argyle
1.65Average goals (2nd half)1.59
ReadingPlymouth Argyle
30%Clean sheet after half-time52%
ReadingPlymouth Argyle
37%No goal after half-time37%
ReadingPlymouth Argyle

Reading - second-half results

30% W28% R41% P
66
Half-time points
29
Half-time goals
+10
Goal difference (1st half)
55
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.43
PPG before half-time
Lead holding106%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Plymouth Argyle - second-half results

43% W28% R28% P
63
Half-time points
34
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
73
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.37
PPG before half-time
Lead holding145%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 48%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Reading - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.400.80
Goals scored / match0.00.6
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match0.61.6
1 goal60%100%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference-3-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Plymouth Argyle - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.802.00
Goals scored / match1.01.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.62.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+2+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Reading
ScoredConceded
8
9
0-15
8
5
16-30
13
5
31-45
7
12
46-60
12
16
61-75
16
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (16 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Plymouth Argyle
ScoredConceded
8
10
0-15
10
10
16-30
16
11
31-45
13
13
46-60
16
7
61-75
12
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (16 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.84
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
109%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
61%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+75%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
68%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Reading

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.28
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
94%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
113%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-1.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Plymouth Argyle

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
142%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
93%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.61
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League One).

Teams vs league

ReadingLigaPlymouth Argyle
Average goals in match 2.702.62 3.00
Both teams scored 67%52% 54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 48%51% 59%
Clean sheets 17%27% 26%
Goal before half-time 70%70% 76%
Goal after half-time 93%81% 87%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.62
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.48
Home goals / match
1.15
Away goals / match
+29%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Reading 1 - 0 - 0 Plymouth Argyle. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Reading vs Plymouth Argyle?

The EFL League One match finished Reading 2:2 Plymouth Argyle. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Reading vs Plymouth Argyle?

Reading score 1.39 goals per game on average and Plymouth Argyle 1.63. The EFL League One average is 2.62 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Reading's matches and 54% of Plymouth Argyle's.

What form are Reading and Plymouth Argyle in?

Over the last 5 games Reading have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Plymouth Argyle 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Reading vs Plymouth Argyle?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.