England - EFL League OneData current as of 18 July 2026

Reading vs Wigan Athletic: match statistics

Reading crest
Reading
3 : 0half-time 2:0
Wigan Athletic crest
Wigan Athletic
155%(2.15)
X30%(3.40)
215%(3.30)

Reading displays a clear advantage in home matches with a 47% win rate and a positive goal difference (+6). The hosts score an average of 1.47 goals per home match, conceding only 1.16, which, combined with 51% possession, indicates stability. Wigan Athletic has a very poor away record – only 11% wins, as many as 42% defeats, and a negative goal difference (-14). The visitors concede an average of 1.89 goals in away matches, and their form in recent away fixtures (L,L,D,D,L,D,D,D,W,D,L,W,L,D,L,L,L,D,D) confirms consistency issues. The difference in quality between Reading's home performance and Wigan's away performance is significant enough that the hosts should secure three points. A draw is also possible due to Reading's tendency to share points (37% draws at home), but the statistical advantage points to a home win.

Reading vs Wigan Athletic: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Reading play Wigan Athletic in EFL League One (England). The match date is 28 March 2026 at 16:00. Final score: 3:0.

Current form

Reading: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Wigan Athletic: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Reading scores 1.39 and concedes 1.30 goals per match. Wigan Athletic scores 1.07 and concedes 1.26. League average: 2.62 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Reading 67%, Wigan Athletic 43%. Over 2.5: Reading 48%, Wigan Athletic 35%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 51%.

xG, shots and style

Reading has higher xG: 1.23 vs 1.21. Reading: 11.0 shots per match, Wigan Athletic: 10.3.

Match halves

Reading: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.76. Wigan Athletic: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.59.

Goals by minute

Reading: 76-90+ (16 goals). Wigan Athletic: 0-15 (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

League One: 2.62 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 51%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Reading displays a clear advantage in home matches with a 47% win rate and a positive goal difference (+6). The hosts score an average of 1.47 goals per home match, conceding only 1.16, which, combined with 51% possession, indicates stability. Wigan Athletic has a very poor away record – only 11% wins, as many as 42% defeats, and a negative goal difference (-14). The visitors concede an average of 1.89 goals in away matches, and their form in recent away fixtures (L,L,D,D,L,D,D,D,W,D,L,W,L,D,L,L,L,D,D) confirms consistency issues. The difference in quality between Reading's home performance and Wigan's away performance is significant enough that the hosts should secure three points. A draw is also possible due to Reading's tendency to share points (37% draws at home), but the statistical advantage points to a home win.

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

46Possession (%)54
ReadingWigan Athletic
13Shots6
ReadingWigan Athletic
5Shots on target1
ReadingWigan Athletic
1.34xG0.83
ReadingWigan Athletic
3Corners9
ReadingWigan Athletic
23Dangerous attacks51
ReadingWigan Athletic
14Fouls8
ReadingWigan Athletic
0Cards0
ReadingWigan Athletic

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

ReadingWigan Athletic
1.39Goals scored / match1.07
ReadingWigan Athletic
1.3Goals conceded / match1.26
ReadingWigan Athletic
50%Average possession45%
ReadingWigan Athletic
3.78Shots on target / match3.35
ReadingWigan Athletic

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.96Shots per match10.33
ReadingWigan Athletic
3.78Shots on target3.35
ReadingWigan Athletic
12.7%Shot conversion10.3%
ReadingWigan Athletic
50%Possession45%
ReadingWigan Athletic
1.23xG for1.21
ReadingWigan Athletic
1.42xG against1.41
ReadingWigan Athletic

Shooting quality

Reading: BalancedWigan Athletic: Balanced
ReadingWigan Athletic
Accuracy (shots on target)34%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Wigan Athletic is 600% better for: last-5 form.

0.2 pts / match - Reading · 1.4 pts / match - Wigan Athletic

Reading
LLLDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
35% W33% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
16-15-15
1.37 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
10-7-6
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
DWLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.13Opponent xG: 1.37BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Wigan Athletic
WWDLL
Season result split
30% W30% R39% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-14-18
1.22 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-10-10
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DLWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.33Opponent xG: 1.24BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Reading is 30% better for: goals scored per match.

1.39 goals / match - Reading · 1.07 goals / match - Wigan Athletic

Reading scoring profile: very strong

Reading scores in 85% of matches (39 of 46 matches), while Wigan Athletic keeps a clean sheet in 28% (13 of 46 matches).

Wigan Athletic scoring profile: very strong

Wigan Athletic scores in 65% of matches (30 of 46 matches), while Reading keeps a clean sheet in 17% (8 of 46 matches).

64Goals scored (season)49
ReadingWigan Athletic
60Goals conceded (season)58
ReadingWigan Athletic
2.7Average goals in match2.33
ReadingWigan Athletic
3Goals scored (last 5)5
ReadingWigan Athletic
8Goals conceded (last 5)3
ReadingWigan Athletic

How often they score at least...

85%1 goal65%
ReadingWigan Athletic
39%2 goals30%
ReadingWigan Athletic
13%3 goals11%
ReadingWigan Athletic
2%4 goals0%
ReadingWigan Athletic

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal72%
ReadingWigan Athletic
39%2 goals30%
ReadingWigan Athletic
9%3 goals13%
ReadingWigan Athletic
0%4 goals7%
ReadingWigan Athletic

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

52%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time11%
ReadingWigan Athletic
11%BTTS in both halves0%
ReadingWigan Athletic
26%Scored in both halves20%
ReadingWigan Athletic

BTTS and goal count

43%Min. 3 goals and BTTS26%
ReadingWigan Athletic
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
ReadingWigan Athletic
60%BTTS - last 520%
ReadingWigan Athletic

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

70%Min. 1 goal before half-time70%
ReadingWigan Athletic
28%Min. 2 goals before half-time28%
ReadingWigan Athletic
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
ReadingWigan Athletic

2nd half

93%Min. 1 goal after half-time78%
ReadingWigan Athletic
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time30%
ReadingWigan Athletic
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
ReadingWigan Athletic

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Reading is 24% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.43 pts / match - Reading · 1.15 pts / match - Wigan Athletic

Reading - half-time state
33% leading46% draw22% trailing
Wigan Athletic - half-time state
26% leading37% draw37% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.43Points per match (1st half)1.15
ReadingWigan Athletic
0.63Goals scored (1st half)0.48
ReadingWigan Athletic
0.41Goals conceded (1st half)0.63
ReadingWigan Athletic
1.04Average goals (1st half)1.11
ReadingWigan Athletic
59%Clean sheet before half-time57%
ReadingWigan Athletic
52%No goal before half-time63%
ReadingWigan Athletic

After half-time (2nd half)

1.2Points per match (2nd half)1.3
ReadingWigan Athletic
0.76Goals scored (2nd half)0.59
ReadingWigan Athletic
0.89Goals conceded (2nd half)0.63
ReadingWigan Athletic
1.65Average goals (2nd half)1.22
ReadingWigan Athletic
30%Clean sheet after half-time50%
ReadingWigan Athletic
37%No goal after half-time52%
ReadingWigan Athletic

Reading - second-half results

30% W28% R41% P
66
Half-time points
29
Half-time goals
+10
Goal difference (1st half)
55
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.43
PPG before half-time
Lead holding106%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Wigan Athletic - second-half results

33% W33% R35% P
53
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
60
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.15
PPG before half-time
Lead holding115%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Reading - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.400.80
Goals scored / match0.00.6
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match0.61.6
1 goal60%100%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference-3-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Wigan Athletic - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match0.61.0
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Reading
ScoredConceded
8
9
0-15
8
5
16-30
13
5
31-45
7
12
46-60
12
16
61-75
16
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (16 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Wigan Athletic
ScoredConceded
10
10
0-15
7
8
16-30
5
11
31-45
9
7
46-60
8
9
61-75
10
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.51
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+19%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
55%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Reading

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.28
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
94%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
113%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-1.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Wigan Athletic

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.20
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
93%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
85%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League One).

Teams vs league

ReadingLigaWigan Athletic
Average goals in match 2.702.62 2.33
Both teams scored 67%52% 43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 48%51% 35%
Clean sheets 17%27% 28%
Goal before half-time 70%70% 70%
Goal after half-time 93%81% 78%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.62
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.48
Home goals / match
1.15
Away goals / match
+29%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Reading 1 - 0 - 0 Wigan Athletic. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Wigan Athletic FC
1 : 2
Reading FC

FAQ

What was the result of Reading vs Wigan Athletic?

The EFL League One match finished Reading 3:0 Wigan Athletic. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Reading vs Wigan Athletic?

Reading score 1.39 goals per game on average and Wigan Athletic 1.07. The EFL League One average is 2.62 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Reading's matches and 43% of Wigan Athletic's.

What form are Reading and Wigan Athletic in?

Over the last 5 games Reading have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Wigan Athletic 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Reading vs Wigan Athletic?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Reading vs Wigan Athletic: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.