Remo Stars vs Katsina United: match statistics
Remo Stars holds a decisive advantage in home matches with a 54% win rate and an impressive +6 goal difference at their own stadium. The hosts score an average of 1.31 goals per game at home, with only 8% of matches failing to produce a goal, which attests to their offensive efficiency. Katsina United exhibits very poor away form, winning only 17% of their matches on the road, possessing a negative -8 goal difference, and an alarming 67% of matches without scoring a goal. Despite Remo Stars' recent poor form (0 wins in the last 5 matches), their home statistics and advantage in possession (56% vs 41%) along with a higher xG (1.4 vs 1.01) speak in favor of the hosts. While Katsina United does show better recent overall form (1.6 PPG), their drastic weakness in away matches makes them a difficult opponent to overcome for Remo Stars on their home turf.
Remo Stars vs Katsina United: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Remo Stars played against Katsina United in NPFL (Nigeria). The game was played on March 1, 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Recent form
Remo Stars has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.20 points per game. Katsina United has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Remo Stars scores 0.89 goals per game and allows 1.26. Katsina United scores 0.81 and allows 0.77. Games in this league average 1.82 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 48% of Remo Stars's games and 27% of Katsina United's. The Over 2.5 rates are 37% and 12%, compared with league averages of 35% for BTTS and 25% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Remo Stars has the higher season xG average, 1.25 to 1.12 per game. Remo Stars takes 7.0 shots per game, while Katsina United takes 3.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Remo Stars leads at halftime in 15% of its games and scores 0.52 goals per game after halftime. Katsina United leads at halftime in 27% and scores 0.42 after halftime.
When the teams score
Remo Stars's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). For Katsina United, it is minutes 46-60 (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
NPFL games average 1.82 goals. Both teams score in 35% of games, and 25% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Remo Stars holds a decisive advantage in home matches with a 54% win rate and an impressive +6 goal difference at their own stadium. The hosts score an average of 1.31 goals per game at home, with only 8% of matches failing to produce a goal, which attests to their offensive efficiency. Katsina United exhibits very poor away form, winning only 17% of their matches on the road, possessing a negative -8 goal difference, and an alarming 67% of matches without scoring a goal. Despite Remo Stars' recent poor form (0 wins in the last 5 matches), their home statistics and advantage in possession (56% vs 41%) along with a higher xG (1.4 vs 1.01) speak in favor of the hosts. While Katsina United does show better recent overall form (1.6 PPG), their drastic weakness in away matches makes them a difficult opponent to overcome for Remo Stars on their home turf.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Remo Stars | Katsina United | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 28% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.18 | 0.32 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.81 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Katsina United is 700% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / game - Remo Stars · 1.6 pts / game - Katsina United
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Remo Stars is 10% better for: goals scored per game.
0.89 goals / game - Remo Stars · 0.81 goals / game - Katsina United
Katsina United is 64% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.26 goals / game - Remo Stars · 0.77 goals / game - Katsina United
Remo Stars scores in 67% of games (18 of 27 meczów), while Katsina United keeps a clean sheet in 38% (10 of 26 meczów).
Katsina United scores in 54% of games (14 of 26 meczów), while Remo Stars keeps a clean sheet in 19% (5 of 27 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Remo Stars
Over / Under - Katsina United
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Katsina United is 64% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.89 pts / game - Remo Stars · 1.46 pts / game - Katsina United
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Remo Stars - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 15% of games and wins 30%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Katsina United - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 27% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 100% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 0% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 80% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Remo Stars
Katsina United
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NPFL).
Teams vs league
| Remo Stars | Liga | Katsina United | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.15 | 1.82 | ▼ 1.58 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 48% | 35% | ▼ 27% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 37% | 25% | ▼ 12% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 19% | 39% | • 38% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 67% | 60% | ▼ 46% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 70% | 59% | ▲ 69% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Record from Remo Stars's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Katsina United. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Remo Stars vs Katsina United?
The NPFL match finished Remo Stars 2:0 Katsina United. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Remo Stars vs Katsina United?
Remo Stars score 0.89 goals per game on average and Katsina United 0.81. The NPFL average is 1.82 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 25% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Remo Stars's matches and 27% of Katsina United's.
What form are Remo Stars and Katsina United in?
Over the last 5 games Remo Stars have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Katsina United 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Remo Stars vs Katsina United?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.