Nigeria - NPFLData current as of 23 July 2026

Remo Stars vs Kwara United: match statistics

Remo Stars crest
Remo Stars
3 : 1half-time 1:1
Kwara United crest
Kwara United
165%(0.00)
X22%(0.00)
213%(0.00)

Remo Stars display significantly superior home form with a 60% win rate and an impressive +9 goal difference at their own stadium. The hosts average 1.4 goals per match at home with only 7% of matches without a goal, showcasing their offensive efficiency. Kwara United have catastrophic away statistics - only 7% wins, 67% losses, and a negative goal difference of -12, with as many as 67% of matches failing to score. The visitors' mere average of 0.47 goals scored away compared to the hosts' 1.4 at home, along with the advantage in xG (1.46 vs 0.92), further confirms Remo Stars' dominance. The recent form of both teams (1.4 PPG for the hosts vs 1.6 for the visitors) is similar; however, the home/away statistics unequivocally point to a home victory.

Remo Stars vs Kwara United: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Remo Stars play Kwara United in NPFL (Nigeria). The match date is 22 March 2026 at 16:00. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

Remo Stars: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Kwara United: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Remo Stars scores 1.11 and concedes 1.24 goals per match. Kwara United scores 0.92 and concedes 0.95. League average: 2.02 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Remo Stars 55%, Kwara United 34%. Over 2.5: Remo Stars 45%, Kwara United 29%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 34%.

xG, shots and style

Remo Stars has higher xG: 1.37 vs 0.99. Remo Stars: 7.5 shots per match, Kwara United: 3.6.

Match halves

Remo Stars: half-time lead 16%, second-half goals 0.63. Kwara United: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.34.

Goals by minute

Remo Stars: 76-90+ (12 goals). Kwara United: 31-45+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

NPFL: 2.02 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 34%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Remo Stars display significantly superior home form with a 60% win rate and an impressive +9 goal difference at their own stadium. The hosts average 1.4 goals per match at home with only 7% of matches without a goal, showcasing their offensive efficiency. Kwara United have catastrophic away statistics - only 7% wins, 67% losses, and a negative goal difference of -12, with as many as 67% of matches failing to score. The visitors' mere average of 0.47 goals scored away compared to the hosts' 1.4 at home, along with the advantage in xG (1.46 vs 0.92), further confirms Remo Stars' dominance. The recent form of both teams (1.4 PPG for the hosts vs 1.6 for the visitors) is similar; however, the home/away statistics unequivocally point to a home victory.

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

56Possession (%)44
Remo StarsKwara United
26Shots9
Remo StarsKwara United
9Shots on target2
Remo StarsKwara United
2.64xG0.91
Remo StarsKwara United
12Corners2
Remo StarsKwara United
54Dangerous attacks28
Remo StarsKwara United
-1Fouls-1
Remo StarsKwara United
-1Cards-1
Remo StarsKwara United

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Remo StarsKwara United
1.11Goals scored / match0.92
Remo StarsKwara United
1.24Goals conceded / match0.95
Remo StarsKwara United
39%Average possession25%
Remo StarsKwara United
3.24Shots on target / match0.92
Remo StarsKwara United

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.55Shots per match3.61
Remo StarsKwara United
3.24Shots on target0.92
Remo StarsKwara United
14.6%Shot conversion25.5%
Remo StarsKwara United
39%Possession25%
Remo StarsKwara United
1.37xG for0.99
Remo StarsKwara United
1.17xG against1.4
Remo StarsKwara United

Shooting quality

Remo Stars: Counter-attackingKwara United: Counter-attacking
Remo StarsKwara United
Accuracy (shots on target)43%25%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.180.27
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.341.00

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kwara United is 14% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Remo Stars · 1.6 pts / match - Kwara United

Remo Stars
LWLWD
Season result split
37% W13% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-5-19
1.24 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
13-3-3
Last 5 at home
5-0-0
WWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.45Opponent xG: 1.09BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Kwara United
DWDWL
Season result split
34% W29% R37% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-11-14
1.32 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-6-12
Last 5 away
1-2-2
WLDDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 0.49Opponent xG: 1.97BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Remo Stars is 21% better for: goals scored per match.

1.11 goals / match - Remo Stars · 0.92 goals / match - Kwara United

Kwara United is 31% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.24 goals / match - Remo Stars · 0.95 goals / match - Kwara United

Remo Stars scoring profile: strong

Remo Stars scores in 76% of matches (29 of 38 matches), while Kwara United keeps a clean sheet in 37% (14 of 38 matches).

Kwara United scoring profile: strong

Kwara United scores in 55% of matches (21 of 38 matches), while Remo Stars keeps a clean sheet in 21% (8 of 38 matches).

42Goals scored (season)35
Remo StarsKwara United
47Goals conceded (season)36
Remo StarsKwara United
2.34Average goals in match1.87
Remo StarsKwara United
8Goals scored (last 5)6
Remo StarsKwara United
6Goals conceded (last 5)7
Remo StarsKwara United

How often they score at least...

76%1 goal55%
Remo StarsKwara United
29%2 goals32%
Remo StarsKwara United
5%3 goals5%
Remo StarsKwara United
0%4 goals0%
Remo StarsKwara United

How often they concede at least...

79%1 goal63%
Remo StarsKwara United
32%2 goals18%
Remo StarsKwara United
11%3 goals11%
Remo StarsKwara United
3%4 goals3%
Remo StarsKwara United

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

38%
League average

Goal patterns

26%BTTS at half-time18%
Remo StarsKwara United
0%BTTS in both halves5%
Remo StarsKwara United
11%Scored in both halves21%
Remo StarsKwara United

BTTS and goal count

42%Min. 3 goals and BTTS24%
Remo StarsKwara United
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
Remo StarsKwara United
80%BTTS - last 540%
Remo StarsKwara United

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

66%Min. 1 goal before half-time66%
Remo StarsKwara United
34%Min. 2 goals before half-time32%
Remo StarsKwara United
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
Remo StarsKwara United

2nd half

76%Min. 1 goal after half-time55%
Remo StarsKwara United
37%Min. 2 goals after half-time24%
Remo StarsKwara United
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time5%
Remo StarsKwara United

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kwara United is 37% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Remo Stars · 1.37 pts / match - Kwara United

Remo Stars - half-time state
16% leading53% draw32% trailing
Kwara United - half-time state
29% leading50% draw21% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.37
Remo StarsKwara United
0.47Goals scored (1st half)0.58
Remo StarsKwara United
0.63Goals conceded (1st half)0.42
Remo StarsKwara United
1.11Average goals (1st half)1
Remo StarsKwara United
47%Clean sheet before half-time63%
Remo StarsKwara United
61%No goal before half-time53%
Remo StarsKwara United

After half-time (2nd half)

1.39Points per match (2nd half)1.11
Remo StarsKwara United
0.63Goals scored (2nd half)0.34
Remo StarsKwara United
0.61Goals conceded (2nd half)0.53
Remo StarsKwara United
1.24Average goals (2nd half)0.87
Remo StarsKwara United
55%Clean sheet after half-time61%
Remo StarsKwara United
53%No goal after half-time71%
Remo StarsKwara United

Remo Stars - second-half results

37% W29% R34% P
38
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
53
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding231%

Leads at half-time in 16% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kwara United - second-half results

18% W55% R26% P
52
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.37
PPG before half-time
Lead holding117%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 34%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Remo Stars - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.20
Goals scored / match1.00.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+3-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
Kwara United - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.60
Goals scored / match1.00.2
Goals conceded / match0.21.2
Average goals in match1.21.4
1 goal60%60%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+4-5
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Remo Stars
ScoredConceded
6
9
0-15
1
7
16-30
11
8
31-45
3
6
46-60
9
5
61-75
12
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Kwara United
ScoredConceded
6
2
0-15
6
9
16-30
10
5
31-45
3
6
46-60
3
7
61-75
7
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.11
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
45%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+90%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
42%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Remo Stars

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.20
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.33
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
77%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
214%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.16
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Kwara United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.41
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.38
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.45
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
159%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
66%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.28
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NPFL).

Teams vs league

Remo StarsLigaKwara United
Average goals in match 2.342.02 1.87
Both teams scored 55%38% 34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 45%34% 29%
Clean sheets 21%37% 37%
Goal before half-time 66%61% 66%
Goal after half-time 76%64% 55%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.02
Average goals per match
38%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
37%
Clean sheets
1.44
Home goals / match
0.58
Away goals / match
+148%
Home attack advantage
+60%
Home defence advantage
+52%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
64%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Remo Stars 0 - 0 - 1 Kwara United. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Kwara United
3 : 1
Remo Stars

FAQ

What was the result of Remo Stars vs Kwara United?

The NPFL match finished Remo Stars 3:1 Kwara United. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Remo Stars vs Kwara United?

Remo Stars score 1.11 goals per game on average and Kwara United 0.92. The NPFL average is 2.02 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 55% of Remo Stars's matches and 34% of Kwara United's.

What form are Remo Stars and Kwara United in?

Over the last 5 games Remo Stars have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Kwara United 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Remo Stars vs Kwara United?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Remo Stars vs Kwara United: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.