Remo Stars vs Nasarawa United: match statistics
Remo Stars exhibit a distinct advantage at their own stadium with an impressive record of a 57% home win rate and only 21% of matches lost. The hosts score an average of 1.36 goals per home game, maintaining a positive +8 goal difference, which heavily contrasts with the visitors' form. Nasarawa United show poor results on the road – only a 21% win rate and a massive 50% loss rate, with an average of just 0.5 goals scored per away match and a negative goal difference of -7. Furthermore, the visitors fail to score in 64% of their away fixtures, making them a less threatening opponent. Even though Remo Stars' form over their last five matches is not perfect (0.8 PPG), their home advantage and Nasarawa United's away struggles point towards a home win. Taking all statistical data into account, the most likely outcome is a victory for Remo Stars.
Remo Stars vs Nasarawa United: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Remo Stars played against Nasarawa United in NPFL (Nigeria). The game was played on March 15, 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Remo Stars has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Nasarawa United has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Remo Stars scores 0.93 goals per game and allows 1.31. Nasarawa United scores 0.90 and allows 0.76. Games in this league average 1.87 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 48% of Remo Stars's games and 34% of Nasarawa United's. The Over 2.5 rates are 38% and 24%, compared with league averages of 36% for BTTS and 27% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Nasarawa United has the higher season xG average, 1.72 to 1.27 per game. Remo Stars takes 6.9 shots per game, while Nasarawa United takes 8.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Remo Stars leads at halftime in 14% of its games and scores 0.55 goals per game after halftime. Nasarawa United leads at halftime in 24% and scores 0.41 after halftime.
When the teams score
Remo Stars's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). For Nasarawa United, it is minutes 31-45+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
NPFL games average 1.87 goals. Both teams score in 36% of games, and 27% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Remo Stars exhibit a distinct advantage at their own stadium with an impressive record of a 57% home win rate and only 21% of matches lost. The hosts score an average of 1.36 goals per home game, maintaining a positive +8 goal difference, which heavily contrasts with the visitors' form. Nasarawa United show poor results on the road – only a 21% win rate and a massive 50% loss rate, with an average of just 0.5 goals scored per away match and a negative goal difference of -7. Furthermore, the visitors fail to score in 64% of their away fixtures, making them a less threatening opponent. Even though Remo Stars' form over their last five matches is not perfect (0.8 PPG), their home advantage and Nasarawa United's away struggles point towards a home win. Taking all statistical data into account, the most likely outcome is a victory for Remo Stars.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Remo Stars | Nasarawa United | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.19 | 0.20 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Nasarawa United is 75% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - Remo Stars · 1.4 pts / game - Nasarawa United
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Nasarawa United is 72% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.31 goals / game - Remo Stars · 0.76 goals / game - Nasarawa United
Remo Stars scores in 69% of games (20 of 29 meczów), while Nasarawa United keeps a clean sheet in 38% (11 of 29 meczów).
Nasarawa United scores in 62% of games (18 of 29 meczów), while Remo Stars keeps a clean sheet in 21% (6 of 29 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Remo Stars
Over / Under - Nasarawa United
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Nasarawa United is 44% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.86 pts / game - Remo Stars · 1.24 pts / game - Nasarawa United
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Remo Stars - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 31%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Nasarawa United - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 24% of games and wins 45%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Remo Stars
Nasarawa United
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NPFL).
Teams vs league
| Remo Stars | Liga | Nasarawa United | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.24 | 1.87 | ▼ 1.66 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 48% | 36% | ▼ 34% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 38% | 27% | ▼ 24% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 21% | 38% | • 38% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 66% | 62% | ▲ 69% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 72% | 60% | ▼ 55% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Record from Remo Stars's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Nasarawa United. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Remo Stars vs Nasarawa United?
The NPFL match finished Remo Stars 2:1 Nasarawa United. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Remo Stars vs Nasarawa United?
Remo Stars score 0.93 goals per game on average and Nasarawa United 0.90. The NPFL average is 1.87 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 27% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Remo Stars's matches and 34% of Nasarawa United's.
What form are Remo Stars and Nasarawa United in?
Over the last 5 games Remo Stars have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Nasarawa United 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Remo Stars vs Nasarawa United?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.