Nigeria - NPFLData current as of September 12, 2026

Remo Stars vs Niger Tornadoes: match statistics

Remo Stars crest
Remo Stars
3 : 0half-time 2:0
Niger Tornadoes crest
Niger Tornadoes

Remo Stars vs Niger Tornadoes: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Remo Stars played against Niger Tornadoes in NPFL (Nigeria). The game was played on April 19, 2026. Final score: 3:0.

Recent form

Remo Stars has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Niger Tornadoes has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Remo Stars scores 1.03 goals per game and allows 1.26. Niger Tornadoes scores 1.00 and allows 0.91. Games in this league average 1.93 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 53% of Remo Stars's games and 26% of Niger Tornadoes's. The Over 2.5 rates are 41% and 29%, compared with league averages of 37% for BTTS and 30% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Niger Tornadoes has the higher season xG average, 1.51 to 1.33 per game. Remo Stars takes 7.5 shots per game, while Niger Tornadoes takes 8.7.

First-half and second-half trends

Remo Stars leads at halftime in 12% of its games and scores 0.65 goals per game after halftime. Niger Tornadoes leads at halftime in 26% and scores 0.65 after halftime.

When the teams score

Remo Stars's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). For Niger Tornadoes, it is minutes 76-90+ (12 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

NPFL games average 1.93 goals. Both teams score in 37% of games, and 30% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Remo Stars possess a clear home advantage: they win 65% of matches at home, score an average of 1.47 goals and concede 0.76 per game, with xG 1.52 versus opponents’ xG 0.98. Niger Tornadoes have very poor away figures — only 6% wins, just 0.41 goals scored per match and 1.41 conceded, and 65% of their away games end without them scoring. The difference in chance quality is stark: Remo average 12.33 shots and 5.47 on target per home game, while the visitors record 7.18 shots and 2.18 on target, with conversion rates of 12% versus 5%. In the last 5 matches Remo have scored 8 goals and won 3 games (averaging 2 points per match), whereas Niger have 4 goals and 2 wins in that period (averaging 1.4 points per match). Considering the superiority in possession (56% vs 45%), higher xG and better home defense (41% clean sheets vs 12% for the visitors), I forecast a Remo Stars victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The analysis indicates No BTTS (selection: 'no'), because hosts Remo Stars possess a very strong defensive profile this season: 76% clean sheets and only 0.41 goals conceded per game on average. Remo’s attack produces 1.9 xG and 1.59 average goals per match with 5.2 shots on target and an 11% conversion rate, making them the primary scoring threat (xG 1.9 vs 0.98 for the visitors). Niger Tornadoes have limited offensive output — 0.41 goals this season, xG 0.98, 2.18 shots on target and a 5% conversion, and in their last 5 matches they averaged 0.8 goals with BTTS in only 20% of games. Seasonal BTTS rates are just 24% for the home side and 29% for the away side versus a league level of 36%, and the home advantage in xG (1.9 vs 0.98) and shots (15.0 vs 7.18) further supports that likely only one side will score. Therefore I assess No BTTS at 75% vs 25% for BTTS, treating the short-term home signal of 80% BTTS in the last 5 matches as an outlier relative to season data.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I expect a low-scoring game: expected goals are Remo Stars 1.50 (home xG 1.59 vs Niger’s away conceded 1.41) and Niger Tornadoes 0.41 (away xG 0.41 vs Remo conceded 0.41), totaling 1.91 goals. Remo has 76% clean sheets this season and averages 5.2 shots on target with an 11% conversion rate, while Niger away averages only 2.18 shots on target and a 5% conversion, which significantly limits their scoring potential. Season metrics show only 29% of matches involving both teams finish over 2.5 goals (Under 71%), and a Poisson approximation for a sum of 1.91 yields ~57% for Over 1.5, ~30% for Over 2.5 and ~13% for Over 3.5. Consequently the strongest and most conservative pick is Under 2.5 (under ~70%), since Remo’s high clean sheet rate and Niger’s very poor away finishing outweigh occasional better-form spells from the hosts.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Remo Stars have a clear advantage: they score an average of 1.59 goals per match with xG 1.90 and register 0.65 goals by half-time, whereas Niger Tornadoes manage only 0.41 goals per match, xG 0.98 and just 0.06 goals by half-time. The hosts led at the break in 9 fixtures (53%), while the visitors never led at the break (0%), which, combined with Remo’s overall 65% win rate versus Niger’s 6%, suggests a high probability of the hosts leading at half-time and winning at full-time. Remo averages 5.2 shots on target and 15.0 shots per match, while Niger records 2.18 shots on target and 7.18 shots overall, and the visitors concede on average 1.41 goals per match and 0.82 by half-time, confirming the hosts’ offensive dominance. Additionally, the hosts keep a clean sheet in 76% of matches and 88% at half-time, whereas Niger have only 12% clean sheets, which reduces the visitors’ chances of a turnaround. For these reasons I assign the largest share (39%) to the 1/1 scenario; I also allocate 21% to a draw at full-time when level at half-time (X/X) and 11% to the hosts coming back from a draw at half-time to win (X/1), with the remaining scenarios assigned lower probabilities.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

2 : 0
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

54Possession (%)46
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes
21Shots8
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes
10Shots on target3
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes
2.49xG0.93
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes
7Corners3
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes
66Dangerous attacks29
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes
-1Fouls-1
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes
-1Cards-1
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes
1.03Goals scored / game1
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes
1.26Goals allowed / game0.91
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes
39%Average possession39%
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes
3.03Shots on target / game2.76
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

7.47Shots per game8.71
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes
3.03Shots on target2.76
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes
13.8%Shot conversion11.5%
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes
39%Possession39%
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes
1.33xG for1.51
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes
1.19xG against1.56
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes

Shooting quality

Remo Stars: Counter-attackingNiger Tornadoes: Balanced
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes
Accuracy (shots on target)41%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.180.17
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Remo Stars is 43% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / game - Remo Stars · 1.4 pts / game - Niger Tornadoes

Remo Stars
WWDWL
Season result split
35% W12% D53% L
Season (W-D-L)
12-4-18
1.18 pts / game · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
11-3-3
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
DWWWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.64Opponent xG: 1.14BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Niger Tornadoes
WLWLD
Season result split
35% W21% D44% L
Season (W-D-L)
12-7-15
1.26 pts / game · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-14
Last 5 away
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.62Opponent xG: 1.44BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Niger Tornadoes is 38% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.26 goals / game - Remo Stars · 0.91 goals / game - Niger Tornadoes

Remo Stars scoring profile: strong

Remo Stars scores in 74% of games (25 of 34 meczów), while Niger Tornadoes keeps a clean sheet in 44% (15 of 34 meczów).

Niger Tornadoes scoring profile: strong

Niger Tornadoes scores in 59% of games (20 of 34 meczów), while Remo Stars keeps a clean sheet in 21% (7 of 34 meczów).

35Goals scored (season)34
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes
43Goals conceded (season)31
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes
2.29Average goals per game1.91
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes
8Goals scored (last 5)4
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes
5Goals conceded (last 5)3
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes

How often they score at least...

74%1 goal59%
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes
26%2 goals26%
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes
3%3 goals9%
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes
0%4 goals6%
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes

How often they concede at least...

79%1 goal56%
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes
32%2 goals32%
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes
12%3 goals3%
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes
3%4 goals0%
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

37%
League average

Goal patterns

24%BTTS at half-time3%
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes
6%Scored in both halves15%
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes

BTTS and goal count

41%Min. 3 goals and BTTS21%
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes
80%BTTS - last 520%
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

62%Min. 1 goal before half-time62%
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time24%
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes

2nd half

74%Min. 1 goal after half-time68%
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes
41%Min. 2 goals after half-time29%
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes
12%Min. 3 goals after half-time6%
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Niger Tornadoes is 38% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.88 pts / game - Remo Stars · 1.21 pts / game - Niger Tornadoes

Remo Stars - half-time state
12% leading53% draw35% trailing
Niger Tornadoes - half-time state
26% leading41% draw32% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.88Points per game (1st half)1.21
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes
0.38Goals scored (1st half)0.35
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes
0.65Goals conceded (1st half)0.53
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes
1.03Average goals (1st half)0.88
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes
47%Clean sheet before half-time65%
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes
68%No goal before half-time71%
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes

After half-time (2nd half)

1.38Points per game (2nd half)1.38
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes
0.65Goals scored (2nd half)0.65
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes
0.62Goals conceded (2nd half)0.38
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes
1.26Average goals (2nd half)1.03
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes
56%Clean sheet after half-time65%
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes
53%No goal after half-time56%
Remo StarsNiger Tornadoes

Remo Stars - second-half results

35% W32% D32% L
30
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
47
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.88
PPG before half-time
Lead holding292%

Leads at halftime in 12% of games and wins 35%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Niger Tornadoes - second-half results

32% W41% D26% L
41
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
47
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.21
PPG before half-time
Lead holding135%

Leads at halftime in 26% of games and wins 35%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.2

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Remo Stars - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.002.00
Goals scored / game0.41.2
Goals allowed / game0.40.6
Average goals per game0.81.8
1 goal40%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference0+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
Niger Tornadoes - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.801.60
Goals scored / game0.00.8
Goals allowed / game0.20.4
Average goals per game0.21.2
1 goal20%80%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference-1+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Remo Stars
ScoredConceded
5
8
0-15
0
6
16-30
8
8
31-45
3
5
46-60
8
5
61-75
11
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Niger Tornadoes
ScoredConceded
6
6
0-15
3
4
16-30
3
8
31-45
4
3
46-60
6
4
61-75
12
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.10
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.0 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
109%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
40%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-52%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
44%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Remo Stars

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.37
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
75%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
229%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.82
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

Niger Tornadoes

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.51
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.65
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
182%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
66%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.14
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
35% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
35%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NPFL).

Teams vs league

Remo StarsLigaNiger Tornadoes
Average goals per game 2.291.93 1.91
Both teams scored 53%37% 26%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 41%30% 29%
Clean sheets 21%38% 44%
Goal before half-time 62%59% 62%
Goal after half-time 74%62% 68%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.93
Average goals per game
37%
Both teams scored
30%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
38%
Clean sheets
1.38
Home goals / game
0.55
Away goals / game
+151%
Home attack advantage
+60%
Home defensive advantage
+50%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Remo StarsGoalOlamilekan Adedayo
  2. Remo StarsGoalSamuel Anakwe

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Remo Stars's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Niger Tornadoes. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Remo Stars vs Niger Tornadoes?

The NPFL match finished Remo Stars 3:0 Niger Tornadoes. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Remo Stars vs Niger Tornadoes?

Remo Stars score 1.03 goals per game on average and Niger Tornadoes 1.00. The NPFL average is 1.93 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 30% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Remo Stars's matches and 26% of Niger Tornadoes's.

What form are Remo Stars and Niger Tornadoes in?

Over the last 5 games Remo Stars have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Niger Tornadoes 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Remo Stars vs Niger Tornadoes?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.