Remo vs São Paulo: match statistics
Remo vs São Paulo: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Remo play São Paulo in Serie A (Brazil). The match date is 1 June 2026 at 01:30. Venue: Estádio Estadual Jornalista Edgar Augusto Proença. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Remo: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. São Paulo: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Remo scores 1.17 and concedes 1.61 goals per match. São Paulo scores 1.28 and concedes 1.11. League average: 2.65 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Remo 56%, São Paulo 56%. Over 2.5: Remo 44%, São Paulo 39%. League level: BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 50%.
xG, shots and style
São Paulo has higher xG: 1.35 vs 1.30. Remo: 12.2 shots per match, São Paulo: 11.8.
Match halves
Remo: half-time lead 6%, second-half goals 0.61. São Paulo: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.89.
Goals by minute
Remo: 76-90+ (7 goals). São Paulo: 61-75 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Serie A: 2.65 goals per match, BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 50%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Match description
I predict a home win (1), because Remo shows better form in the last 5 matches: 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss (avg. 2 points per game), while São Paulo has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses in that period (avg. 1 point per game). Remo scored 9 goals in the last 5 fixtures versus São Paulo’s 6, hosts score on average 1.25 goals per home match with 4.5 shots on target, and São Paulo as the away side has 1.00 goal per match and 4.11 shots on target, which gives Remo an advantage in quality and quantity of chances. On the other hand São Paulo sits 7th compared to Remo’s 19th and has a better seasonal goal difference: 23 scored and 19 conceded versus Remo’s 20 scored and 29 conceded, as well as higher average away possession (55% vs 40%), which can limit the hosts’ strengths. Both teams conceded 7 goals in the last 5 matches and have similar xG (Remo 1.34 vs São Paulo 1.24), so I expect a tight, low-margin game with a home edge. Considering Remo’s superior recent form and São Paulo’s poor away record (56% away losses), I assess probabilities as: home 50%, draw 30%, away 20%.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Remo | São Paulo | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Remo is 400% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Remo · 0.4 pts / match - São Paulo
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
São Paulo is 9% better for: goals scored per match.
1.17 goals / match - Remo · 1.28 goals / match - São Paulo
São Paulo is 45% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.61 goals / match - Remo · 1.11 goals / match - São Paulo
Remo scores in 61% of matches (11 of 18 matches), while São Paulo keeps a clean sheet in 22% (4 of 18 matches).
São Paulo scores in 78% of matches (14 of 18 matches), while Remo keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 18 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Remo
Over / Under — São Paulo
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
São Paulo is 56% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.78 pts / match - Remo · 1.22 pts / match - São Paulo
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Remo - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 6% of matches and wins 22%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
São Paulo - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Remo
São Paulo
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie A).
Teams vs league
| Remo | Liga | São Paulo | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.78 | 2.65 | ▼ 2.39 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 56% | 59% | ▼ 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 44% | 50% | ▼ 39% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 11% | 23% | • 22% |
| Goal before half-time | • 78% | 77% | ▼ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 72% | 78% | ▲ 94% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of Remo vs São Paulo?
The Serie A match finished Remo 1:0 São Paulo. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Remo vs São Paulo?
Remo score 1.17 goals per game on average and São Paulo 1.28. The Serie A average is 2.65 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Remo's matches and 56% of São Paulo's.
What form are Remo and São Paulo in?
Over the last 5 games Remo have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and São Paulo 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Remo vs São Paulo?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.